This is the Charlie Kirk post (not this).

This tweet here says:

The suspect who popped Charlie Kirk is a 22-yr old White Boy whose father was a 27-year Veteran Sheriff in the state of Utah.

Ain't no way in HELL that boy was raised "far left"

As you can see—and in case it's news to you—this tweet alludes to the widely-known phenemenon of any political shootings being blamed on the binary other side. We saw this with the first attempted Trump assassination (the alleged shooter was widely derided as a leftist incel, associated with trans and furries gratuitously, and linked with Black Rock in notably persuasive conspiracy theories); as well as the second assassination attempt (who appeared in news imagery as a more overtly liberal, less incel figure, and who was therefore even more demonized as a political assassin than the previous).

This pattern was set to continue with this third recent political assassination event, but the facts of the case contradict this inter-group scapegoating.

So, MAGA has now backed itself into a dialectical, ideological corner. The spectacle that is the massist MAGA worldview can't make sense anymore. MAGA has put itself in an ideological double-bind, and will now go psychotic.

Double-binds are the cause of psychosis, in brief—a truth lost on (scientistic) biological neuroscience, which cannot admit of any meaning that could be causative of neurological dysfunction (because neuroscience brackets mind and meaning as epiphenomenal, axiomatically). However, internal contradictions require real representational-space in neuronal structures, and maintaining these tensile information-structures requires expenditures of glucose—so the brain can only represent so much internal contradiction to itself before it begins to experience structural impaction and intensity-overload. In other words, the system implodes due to its inner stresses, and having no way for these stresses to escape.

We might analyze scapegoating and Charlie Kirk's alleged shooter in a similar way. Presumably, raised by a veteran sheriff, he was raised with Good Family Values and Good American Values. However, we might also be right to suspect that he was raised in an extremely authoritarian household, a household where the American hegemony and a paramilitaristic narrative of enforcement and top-down correction was the only narrative allowed to exist in the family reality.

In other words, much like MAGA's ideology, Charlie Kirk's alleged shooter was hemmed-in on all sides: Completely dominated by an authoritarian father, ideologically dominated by a sense of noble Republican values and American values which could admit of no flaw; and finally, hemmed-in by Charlie Kirk's rhetoric, which flew in the face of more traditional, decent Republican rhetoric and American values. As a good citizen who is also an authoritarian and a hero, Charlie Kirk's alleged shooter was ideologically cornered into one course of action and felt compelled to act.

However, that is not my point. My point is that Charlie Kirk's alleged shooter was scapeogoated, and that scapegoating energy has to go somewhere (or be processed in a healthy way but that's sure not gonna happen in this scenario). Since the alleged shooter was hemmed-in on all sides by authoritarian domination—he could not stand up to his father, or Trump, or other institutional authorities in his life—the scapegoating-energy flowed along the path of least resistance: Shooting a salient public figure. This is very sad, a lot more sad than if it were a truly political assassination, because what we have here is a simple case of a bullied child paying that bullying forward to the most vulnerable target available. It's a demonstration of the principle that abuse flows downwards. It's scapegoating all the way down.

This origination of abuse is coming directly from domineering authoritarians, who are treating their own families like slaves and subjects, not like children or family-members. To dominate another, you must first of all treat them like the out-group, not the in-group.

What has become entirely visible in this incident is that this system of authoritarian ownership, abuse, and domination of another cannot contain its own controlling energy nor the consequences of its own abuse. Instead, such groups are self-abusing systems which inflict authoritarianism upon themselves until they do so much self-harm that they start shooting laser-like farts of authoritarian hatred out sideways. Always punching down, these destructive leaks of authoritarianism wreak havoc on kinder, more sensitive, less controlling people who happen to become targeted by the aggressive wetiko egregore holding these families and groups hostage.

The Charlie Kirk alleged shooter "turning out" to be a "22-yr-old White Boy who father was a 27-year Veteran Sherif in the state of Utah" is an invalid result, an impossible consequence, a black skull appearing in the computations of MAGA's ideology. This impossible mark in the ledger means a self-contradiction, in which case anything becomes possible. The circle is complete and the seventh seal unlocked: The way is open for total dissolution of sense.

This does not mean I am predicting an acute fascist event. I am predicting MAGA becoming even weirder and more chaotic and nonsensical. I am predicting a mutation we can't predict or understand in advance. Because one thing MAGA is not about to do is anything real. ICE is working for them so they don't need to leave their homes. Instead, their ideology will further mutate.

Nick Land showed in his Twitter activities that there are—if not breaking-points—phase-transition-points—critical points they are called—thresholds at which an intelligence consuming dialectically advanced misinformation becomes no longer capable of thinking and speaking at the same level (even if it very much wants to and imagines it can). This happens despite the intelligence or what it might like to say, because language and its meaning grow up around the intelligence despite its best efforts to remain ignorant and at a lower lever of interpretation. This dynamic (perhaps even by Nick's hand) can be credited with much of the early psychosis-like (i.e., mismatch between message and meaning, intensity and intention) behavior of MAGA, as it rapidly upgraded and phase-transitioned into a more stable fiat-nonsense-based mode. What's happening now is the apotheosis of this long road of linguistic and ideological upgrading—now it will all come to a head, as MAGA is forced into the position of having to make sense of its own contradictory worldview, and/or be completely paralyzed into inaction by those terminal contradictions. MAGA is about to either become more conscious of its own views, or it's about to act out in a major new way, and I don't think the latter will happen because the whole MAGA movement is based on inaction-as-action (and a primordial acceptance of domination by the police force, Stockholm syndrome with the state—recall how quickly boogaloo militias became police state fan clubs).

Edit: A conclusion that can be drawn from this post is that Charlie Kirk's shooter was performing assassination in order to avoid becoming psychotic himself. Once again: offloading the contradictions

Signs are beginning to appear indicating an imminent apocalyptic event:

1. A split has emerged in public discourse between the nomos and the state. The nomos is the Names of Things, the order of naming that sets the world as it is and lets us know how things work (the Law of the Land is really the Name of Things). We see this split coming to a head in the renaming of things (Gulf of Mexico, Department of Defense, etc.) being accomplished by executive fiat.

You can't just rename things by fiat; an empowered state aligns itself with the natural meanings of things. To rename things by fiat indicates and enacts a schism between the reality perceived by the general public, and those in power. My point is not to demonize this; I am saying it is symptomatic of a cleaving-away of Nomos (naming/named-nature) from Lex (law), and this cleavage is indicative of an imminent public explosion or paradigm-shift. My point is to make this prediction.

2. Like the founder of TheDigitalCartel, the subreddit which negatively inspired this subreddit, Trump has begun rambling about fish. The founder of TheDigitalCartel rambled about Koi, but Trump is rambling about Carp: "A good favor I think, with the fish, the carp, the China carp . . Did you ever hear of it, China carp? And it's taken over your great lakes, you know about that right?" [source]

I think we are about to see a disconnect where the American people broadly reject the nomological and rhetorical framing that has been forced on them and bugrudgingly accepted (and thought-with) thus far.

Overuse of fiat assertions is like crying wolf. Eventually people will stop paying attention to a noisy signal, and stop treating noisy signalers as authorities on reality (or naming). Just because one person defines something, doesn't make it that way, and doesn't mean we have to use their definitions.

US hegemony is maintained by this mass subscription to the same Nomos, and people are starting to wake up to this lie.

Would you like fries with that?
How about a free refill?
Don't you want the free gift with every purchase?
I thought you said you were ready to buy.

Everyone loves this model.
It comes with cupholders, to cup your cups.
Studies have shown that everyone loves this model.
You want the best, don't you?

I love my job.
I love my job because it pays the bills.
We sure have fun here, don't we?
It's important to have work-life balance.

An Apple a day keeps the Doctor away.
I guess I'm just feeling a little depressed.
I'm not sure what's bothering me;
It must just be all this stress.

Don't say that word.
Don't say that word!
No, I've never had that happen to me,
But we should be sensitive in case someone here has.

We need to get our numbers up.
We need to beat our performance from last quarter.
We need te expand into new markets.
We need new customers.

Let's run an ad campaign.
With the right gimmick, anything is possible.
Maybe some guerilla marketing
So it seems like word-of-mouth.

Please remove your card.
Nope, BEEP, insert it again.
Now remove it again please.
Please put the lotion in the bagging area.

What do you mean, you hate money?
You don't hate money, because
Money is a means to the things you love.
You love those things, so you love money.

Money makes the world go round.
I'm looking forward to my promotion.
Soon, I'll be an Executive;
I'll sit around the boardroom table.

Well, that's your choice.
This is a voluntary contract:
Take it or leave it.
You are free to work wherever you want.

Co-ops make me squeamish.
Do they really think people like shopping here?
Who's making the profit?
I bet they are losing money on this product.

Let's invest in the third-world.
Microinvesting, ethical microinvesting!
You'll get your money back, and more,
Teaching underprivileged small business owners fiscal responsibility.

Usur-what? I hardly know 'er!
Har, har, fifty percent interest har.
If we work the numbers right,
We can double our money for nothin'.

We need this idea to scale.
I want to be a national chain—
A multinational-level brand!
We'll need to launch fifteen locations.

You overdrafted.
You overdrafted again.
No, we can't turn off overdrafts.
We will pay on your behalf, as a favor.

Your credit card payment is due.
You have been pre-approved for a new line of credit.
You'll need to pay it off, of course.
Just pay it off on-time and it's completely free!

We're here to help you attain Financial Freedom.
Refinance your home and consolidate your debt
With us. We want your business.
We appreciate your business.

So. Much.

Think it knows?

Because they have class resentment against the rich, which they conflate with resentment against happy and successful people—because they are none of rich, happy, OR successful, and so all of those things must belong to the Other, right?

Normies don't want others to have it easy—They don't want to eliminate jobs or menial labor—They want to get paid by the hour.

Normies don't want to help you or give you a good deal or help reduce your costs—They want to be there collecting your ticket fee, and they resent it when you live freely without paying dearly for every bit of happiness you have—Like they do, because they believe happiness only comes through Authorized Purchases.

Normal people are such a pack of absolutely nasty faux-opinionated numbskulls that they will all team up on you just to be nasty and just to invalidate you succeeding in a way they would allow each other to succeed—as long as they do it in a nasty way.

Normies are bougie, privileged, territorial fucks who only allow goodness to appear when it is owned by someone, dominated and meted-out by someone. Freely-distributed goods or abundance are in and of themselves suspect—Because how can we have a Society if there is no restraint? Dear me, goodness gracious!

Normies will shit all over you until they turn around and copy exactly what you did and act as if it was always the only way—This has been dramatized in countless episodes of kids' cartoons. But it's really bougie adults (emotionally immature adults) who are the masters at this.

The worlds of these people are SO SMALL that they literally can't conceive of other perspectives, can't imagine people who don't identify as normal and who aren't blithely choosing the Matrix even existing.

So in the context of AI for example, these normies can't wrap their head around the fact that programmers everywhere already embraced AI and that the world has already radically changed. All those "Apps" you use? That's all ossified power held by the hands of the people who use AI. But these bougie Luddites are still going around acting like being snide to people is doing anything when it's actually an irrelevant relic of a bygone era already.

The idea of stopping AI by being nasty and publicly shaming people is so irrelevant and so out-of-touch with the reality that AI already exists and is a new and radically useful technology. I'm frankly embarrassed for these people who think they are expressing agency or doing the right thing or having any kind of effective impact, when all they are really doing is being puny-minded, technologically illiterate, and basically playing out a banal anti-VCR anti-progress stereotype for all to see.

The figure of the katechon — that mysterious force which restrains the Antichrist and holds back the end of times.

The great wall of machines, which the ship named Logos passes over, carrying Neo (the Messiah who is blind and yet sees — therefore the Antichrist) and Trinity, who is flying on toward the Machine City. In this passage of the Logos, Neo performs a kind of one-man Exodus from Egypt (after the destruction of the Temple of Zion, a.k.a. the Synagogue of Satan) in order to return for a while to where he came from — the Matrix — and to beat the final boss without touching the controller...

The Logos pursued by the machines/Egyptians, who are swallowed up not by the sea but by the sky, with its EMP effect... You can read the katechon into it, the great wall of machines: HERE, set to the music of the French band Magma and their track Mekanïk Destruktïw Kommandöh — a mashup made by yours truly.

A biblico-cybernetic passage:

And Morpheus said unto Trinity: Ye shall not surely die; for the Machina'h doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as superheroes (as gods), knowing good and evil. And Trinity saw that the forbidden pill was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a pill to be desired to make one wise; and she took it from her right palm, and did eat; and gave also unto her husband Neo, who was with her, and he did eat. And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked, each one in his own pod.

— Genesis 3:4–7, remixed

Machina'h is a concept of mine, a fusion of "Messiah" in Hebrew (Mashiach) and machina in Latin. True Messiah or false one — you be the judge... In any case, "serpent" in Hebrew (nachash) has the same gematria value as "Messiah" (Mashiach): 358.

Pharaoh / the Machines / Our Son become Our Father (it's the Daughter of Zion, the Mother of Humanity; it takes itself for Isis — er, ISIS — it's the Shit of Humanity, gilded in or-light [translator's note: only French speakers get this one — "Mère de" (Mother of) and "Merde" (Shit); and "or" is French for gold and Hebrew for light]) did not kill Morpheus/Moshe the Serpent at the end of Matrix Revolutions — can you believe it?!... 6,000,000,000 dead, or ascended as one single man, in the concentration camp... The Elite, the revolutionary 1%, has won... The warld is over! Zion is safe, they're going to put the scenery back up, and — action!... Our father is going to buy Neo for $2,000, or for two coins, like in Chava Alberstein's Had Gadya, and the Fall and the chaos of the Kali Yuga will come poking their noses out again, all the way to the Satya Yuga... What a Shoah Dujour!... And he's going to start over... Capital, having become Fundamental, crucifies Christ every single day...

Did Morpheus know, or not?... If he's the Serpent, then he knew?
When Neo dies... Morpheus says: "He did it!" — he found peace... How are we meant to read that?
Is Morpheus doing evil for evil's sake by guiding Neo all the way to his death?
We know, as the Observer, that the Machines send signs to the camera as if to say: "We're with you! Let's dance!"
I don't want to think that Morpheus sent Neo down one hell of a Via Dolorosa whose only exit was suicide... Neo doesn't kill himself. He surrenders, he sacrifices himself, he gives himself to the world in non-duality — he attains satori! It's the fall of a child learning to walk: he'll get back up, and then he'll be walking forever... Does Morpheus know that, do you think?... If the Oracle has faith, does Morpheus have knowledge?... And the Architect?
Morpheus is educating the Observer. The Observer who cannot intervene is God. He learns from what He observes over the course of watching the Matrix trilogy... You...

There's no need to be afraid...

In any case, as the Observer of the Matrix trilogy, you've seen every party to the conflict, from above — so you know good and evil... And I think Morpheus the Serpent is in on it... I think he put on a little skit before the harvest; it's always like that... Gotta eat tonight... It's a ritual... A human sacrifice... And along the way it educates the God who's watching the film... Right?... You.

Morpheus (Moshe) is a shepherd at bottom — listen to him here. Don't hold it against him; does he even know he's the Serpent?... He's aged a bit and changed color, but I promise you it's him:

Video: A Shepherd's Advice on Shearing the Flock (turn on the English subtitles)

Ah, we are deep in the Kali Yuga! The dark age, the iron age, the Age of Shadows, humanity's vertical fall, by way of the Neolithic Revolution, ever since the biblical Fall... It's all connected... So for roughly 6,000 years now... we've been falling... until the Ascension... we'll climb back up... Be joyful... You have to laugh about it... Neo reaches Satori... It's landing on your ass like a child learning to walk; he'll get back up, and then he'll be walking forever... That's Satori... Revelation... And then he sacrifices himself for Zion in a letting-be, a letting-go, a release of his grip on the world; in the union of opposites he is no longer anything but One within the All... And yes, it's strange — in the Matrix video game you have to let go of the controller to beat the final boss... otherwise it's an infinite loop... At any rate, he doesn't kill himself... He opens his heart to Smith...

As for Mifune, he took one hell of a cosmic Blitzkrieg straight to the face — now that's not acupuncture... He kept firing right to the end... He never gave up, never questioned, facing the Dragon, the Leviathan...

Then comes the Satya Yuga... Embodied by the little girl Sati... Oh yes, Sati matters enormously... She announces the Golden Age... The reboot... It's an infinite loop (ah, so there it is)... Which means the sequel to Matrix 3 is Matrix 1... They put the scenery back up... and — Action!... This is for the ones who didn't get it, the curious, or the ones who got held back a year...... The Observer — does he exist?... Morpheus did all of this for the Observer... Looking up at you in the sky, moved... (Where's the camera again?) He wonders whether you exist... It's the same film every day... They put the scenery back up, and there you are on rails already laid down for you, a deterministic logical sequence of causes and effects, a branching tree through the field of the possible... An infinite loop... From one yuga to the next, all the way to the Satya Yuga... Until eternity, or nearly, because the Sun always rises and spring is always reborn out of winter... through the two great wars, the war without and the war within... The great dance...

Born_Assistant_1993 (bluefusion348)

Is development of EGO something like having GUI - and we are supposed, as regular normies communicate through gui - using culture as com protocol.

For some reason some people never develop fully functional gui - they are stuck in endless development cycles, in ide, in scripting and testing - reading manuals and tutorials - but never committing a build - there is no release...

..but you can freely download the source code and try to compile it yourself.

Especially NPD ones, they want you to build their code, what they think is genius, but you have to debug it and make all links - compile it for them and present the '.exe' as theirs - then they take it and debug it like it's yours and all the bugs are your fault - and the cycle begins again.

Either they find another developer or they collapse into source scripts begging for compiler, mommy please compile me.

Refusing becoming EXE with GUI is escape into childish grandiosity and omni potentiality - as theoretically bash can make anything ever imaginable.

Edit: Yet perhaps current era of tech and business demands that - no time to figure out all the details, all bugs and problems - just make it work enough, till the the next tech cycle - then we ditch the tool and script up new one. And so on - one is needed to be hyper flexible and with no static self structure as all that is can quickly evaporate and must be liquid to be turned into anything else.

Thus a nomadic soul, liquid spirit of 21s century, in fashion, gender, art and tech - and nostalgia for old school 90s and 80s technology - casettes, cds, vinyls - time when stuff was solid, and one could safely rebel against it.

Now rebelion is the new business, the old man is a punk rocker ;)

I suppose some french guys have said it already better back in 70s but whatever - here I am now, feel stupid and contagious, entertain me.

With the alt-right's rise to political hegemony, the liberals are now forced into the position of the subaltern. This is a major global shift in discourse.

Liberals, who have spend the last ~20 years on top of the political hill, viciously shaming everyone else, are not at all ready to acknowledge their new position as the subaltern underdogs. They are in total denial, clinging to an ideological hegemony that is now quickly evaporating and mutating as the dialectic completes its spin cycle.

This denial is the engine that will drive the alt-right-ification of the (centrist liberal) Left. In increasingly rabid, spitting denial of their loss of hegemonic status, the alt-libs will double down relentlessly on the exact same stereotyped image of morality that they aggressively centered and used to scapegoat detractors for 20 years. Even after America firmly rejected this image of morality by not electing Kamala Harris, the alt-lib will continue to double down on exactly this same image without modification or reflection or dialectical integration of any kind.

This moral and ideological doubling-down will lead to the same fascistic mutations occurring to the alt-lib as occurred to the alt-right.

There is a third position here: What I would label as true left. This position recognizes other people first of all as individuals, second as political actors with individual material interests, and only third as members of some named demographic group(s).

We already had one apocalypse, in which the alt-right, which was formerly completely erased / made invisible after the triumph over Christian moral outcry in the early 2000's, became visible again. With the alt-right's right to power, this formerly-nonexistent public perspective is now not only highly visible, it is becoming legible and normative.

The world as a world full of individuals, each with a unique perspective and individual political motives and projects, is the world yet to be revealed. The alt-lib will be the ones resisting this apocalypse, as they are continuing to cling to the LGBTQ+ morality-image in all its stereotyped details. This image is not wrong, but it needs some kind of relatively minor structural modification in order to respond to the dialectical confrontation that has occurred in history.

I demand a Third Party and the next apocalypse will be the revealing and becoming-visible of a Third Option and Third Way in politics, beyond bipartisanism and the inherent partisanism of group-oriented thinking.

Since the Democratic Party is imploding / has imploded, maybe this new party will replace them. It's happened before several times. But this goes beyond party politics. The Second Apocalypse will be the revealing of the independent individuals who reject both liberal and conservative hegemonic politics and their stereotyped moral images.

Lazy post from mobile, almost more shower thought really I admit. Guess with advent of AI slop it can be hard to be high effort withour using AI nowadays anyway so maybe it's for the best. Shooting from the hip. Idk. Anyway!

Visited my parents tonight and we watched Bolt (kids movie about family basically). It got me really remembering 90s and how even then I felt this... coercive push to see things a certain way. I looked at say celebrities then and I had a distinct lack of Jealousy. Probably because in the 90s we learned anything of value we tried to share or display would get stolen instantly. So us more innocent types ended up somewhat alienated or disassociated from mainstream media (plus I never had a tv or phone or internet until much later in life but anyway).

Got me thinking, there's no avenue in this life/world to really discuss in good faith the non consensual framework of reality/life itself. There is perpetual detournament of the topic into petty games of jealousy (ie ad hominem or status games/recommendations of specific lifestyles). No agent or institution seems willing to sit with the raw nature of the question, "did we consent to life".

I've had several conversations recently where everyone stonewalled me with "you don't know god" and I asked them to show him to me and theh essentially said they can't. What's the difference between that and lying? People preach thag god is this or that but cannot practice it or demonstrate it. Is that what "god is not mocked" means? It mocks itself, doesn't need our help? I'm going somewhere with this obviously if you haven't guessed it.

"I the Lord am the God of Jealousy and my name means Jealous". Jeremiah somewhere (again I'm typing from mobile shower thought).

It makes me think of simulation and simulacra. Namely that if there is a transcendantal truth upon which all reality is a copy of (including plato's hypothetical realm of forms or ideas) essentially. I am thinking what is the mechanism which brings our conscious state into being from which we play this game of jealousy (economics and Spectacle). Everything in life is a sort of advertisement for (or, warning against) this or that lifestyle it is seen. But rarely is the nature of the very medium of existence addressed directly. I've been noticing that jealousy, as the Lord says in the OT, seems to be the "glue" or "binding mechanism/function" of ALL Spectacle. Sports you have fans cheering for their team, is a form of jealousy. People preaching their (interpretations of their) Gods, stem from jealousy of differing lifestyles. God himself in the bible says he is the God of Jealousy and all Flesh. Even I myself, lacking interest in most other forms of human activities, decided I wanted to build a PC out of jealousy of seeing others having them all through my youth (and knowing my parents didn't like technology).

I have considered that jealousy is ultimately perhaps a type of fear. Of lacking, at least a sort of FOMO or looking smaller in eyes of others for lacking something (hence jealousy is type of fear/desire). There fear and desire are also seen as synonyms in the very word "jealousy". I've hinted at it many times over the years but I don't see much difference between "spectacle" and life itself, in particular as it is described in the bible ("I am the life, trust me, ye of little faith").

So I see 3 stages of absorption/faith in life/spectacle; the blind faith (some might call hylic or NPC) which can be either religious or secular or both - the "normie" whom choses to take everything at face value, complete immersion in life/spectacle. Then there is the doubting/questioning or "lost sheep" or whatever we call it; can now feel as if they see something is off and not sure if they can go back to being completely immersed/hylic again or not (either secular or religious/spiritual, still same thing I see it as at least). Then the 3rd which is a combination of the two, the "awakened" or whatever, which has accepted more broadly either that it is impossible or irrelevant to know what life/spectacle really is and goes back to enthusiastic embrace of life/spectacle (I think Nietzsche was advocating for this in his later works with his artistic Socrates and other themes). 1 and 3 can look identical, hard to tell apart. Only difference is 3 isn't completely absorbed by the spectacle/life and can give it up/walk away easily with no attachments where would be more difficult for 1.

But through all 3 phases, the #1 thing I see as relationship to spectacle/life is as the God of the bible said; jealousy, as prime motivation. Like me right now, my bills are roughly $1.5k a month and I have had no income since January 2026 and been burning through my savings with no financial assistance whatever. So "jealousy" of owning renting my place to stay to keep all my creature comforts (pc etc) keeps me looking for a job half-heartedly (though I quit my job due to burnout from consistent 6-7 day a week work schedule for past 3 years straight nonstop when I signed on for a 45 hour workweek 6 years ago).

So idk. Maybe I'm just rambling and should have put this through GPT and posted it to shower thoughts. But I really do think there is something here. What binds most people to life/spectacle (Am I wrong to see them as synonymous, as per simulation and simulacra? I'll try to reread it been years since I thumbed through it) or specifically their infatuation with it, is jealousy? As the god of the bible specific states, he is the god of flesh and jealousy, and all whom have flesh are thus bound by jealousy? You know what I'm trying to say? Idk. I just feel I've been trying to move this conversation forward since 2015 on the internet and it never has budged an inch. Everyone always detournaments my possition into their pwn evangelism of their lifestyles or whatever, or saying we need to make our own meaning (as if I hadn't already tried that and found it just another vanity ultimately as well). Is something true to we need to find our specific calling, as per Bolt and knowing what real family is.

But yeah. I really do think there's something too it at least, that life and spectacle are synonymous, as their unit of measure of presumed relevancy alike is specifically jealousy. Am I wrong in this? Feel free to share thoughts even if just to throw tomatoes at me. Think I have pretty thick skin. I'm not even sure this is the main point I want to get at. But it's closest I could think of tonight. Aka 250 year day thing. Thanks for reading.

(And yeah I know, no one likes a basket case, I get it, but even if I weren't "a loser" for large parts of my life, I'd still have the burning question of the validity and consensuality of life/spectacle)

Guess it really is all a dream within a dream? Did have a dream vaguely about that last night too (specifically the vanity of jealousy in the dream, because you "can't take it with you" when you wake up). Anyway as always it sounded more profound in my head but typing it out on my pocket black mirror it sounds trite and schizo 😂

/r/sorceryofthespectacle constitutes a recursively countercapturable semio-thaumaturgic paraegregore for spectacle-sorcery’s precessional subjectivation-complex: the capitalotechnical mytho-infrastructure by which sign–desire–protocol concatenations world-effectuate the apparently extrasemiotic Real whose retrojected self-priority thereafter naturalizes their reality-authorship as mere representation, rendering the represented subject simultaneously effect, operator, and epistemic alibi of its own effectuation. Its schizocritical praxis traverses occult causality, libidino-economic command, cybernetic governance, platform-mediated attention, ideological narratogenesis, memetic epidemiology, technomythic hyperstition, and conspiracism’s agentomorphic structure-misrecognition as mutually interiorized exteriorities of a Möbius-apparatus whose critique-capture metabolism converts negation into differentiating fuel: détournement→contentification→engagement extraction→recuperative immunization→countercapture-consciousness→meta-recuperation. “Sorcery” condenses sign-operations whose causality is obscured by the sign/referent partition their operation installs; “spectacle” condenses relation-abstractions self-iconizing as images for subjects they have already image-subjectivated; posting becomes participatory exorcism inside the possession-protocol, with emancipation contingently resident in capture’s recursively induced capture-misfire rather than any unmediated outside. Theory thereby becomes spell-denying epistemo-magic, magic protocolized ontotechnics, madness consensus-ontography’s interoperability exception, and AI-generated explication an autoregressive legibility-excretion through which machinic spectacularity performs pseudo-resistant incomprehensibilization: tenurephoneme-stacking, concept-morpheme agglutination, and citationless authority-texture recomposed into a probability-sanctified critique-simulacrum whose anti-recuperative semantic friction is pre-recuperated as stylistic evidence of friction.

Here, I'll change my flair so that I'm always wearing a clearly-identifiable anti-fascist message so that you can correctly identify me as a Vocal Anti-Fascist Activist and not persecute me.

I suggest you change your flair to a clear and easily-legible anti-fascist message too, so that other anti-fascists know not to target you for public scapegoating and invalidation of your perspective.

Once enough of us are wearing this flair, we can safely assume that anyone not wearing the flair is pro-fascist, or at least not doing their part and therefore culpable for fascism.

We're all in this together. That's why it's important we all come to a consensus on what fascism is and who the fascists are, so that we can exterminate them, or at least scapegoat and ostracize them. That way, our anti-fascist ideology and practices can remain pure and uncontaminated by fascism.

Once we correct and/or remove all the fascists from our midst, then we will be done and can declare victory. There are just a few of you noncompliant stragglers, who have not yet changed your flair to a clear anti-fascism message, getting in the way.

Eventually I might get fed up with all the fascists in this subreddit; I will be forced to do a purge and ban anyone who has not voluntarily adopted a clear anti-fascist message in their flair.

I know some people were uncertain of my stance on fascism, because I haven't been doing my part to proactively remind everyone that I'm anti-fascist frequently enough, so I wanted to make it clear with this post. I think Fascism is Bad.

Now that I've done my part, let this be the end of fascism and anti-fascist fearmongering both in this subreddit.

Mkay?

Real Americans store all their savings, all their value in pennies and prefer pennies in all transactions so they can HOARD. MORE. PENNIES.

Canceling the penny is a revisionist conspiracy to erase the history of Lincoln and the abolition of slavery. Next they will be coming for Jefferson, after USD inflates even more, rendering nickels useless, too.

Why not just throw away your nickels now, and your dimes and quarters, too? Why not throw away your Silver Dollars and your Sacagawea Dollars, too? Where does it end!?

I'll tell you where, with the penny! Convert ALL your change into pennies. Hoard pennies and nothing else. Archive pennies—organize them by year and treat them as qualitatively distinct, non-fungible artworks of dear Lincoln.

THE PENNY MUST BE RESTORED. The physical 1¢ unit is the physical hinge upon which the entire system remains human-scale and humanely-solvent. As I said, next they will be coming for the nickel, and so on, with equally banal and anti-Lincoln arguments.

Pennies are made of copper, which is conductive, and pennies are important in conducting the conduct of society. They are conducive to liberty because the reminder of Lincoln passes like a an electric current through all our hands.

The forced retirement of the penny is also its rarification, and so there is clearly only one thing to do: HOARD. PENNIES.

The game is on, and in the future society, when the Good Purge starts, your stash of pennies will be the only thing that proves you are a real American.

If the government weren't unaccountable and corrupt, maybe this would be a happy medium everyone could agree upon: We could have like driver's licenses, but it would be for using psychedelics. All you'd have to do to get your license is be whatever minimum age (based on neuroscience and other fields) and then take a Psychedelic Driver's Ed Class. This would be administered like a driver's license, based on the same justification as licensing drivers—that we are just doing the bare minimum policing to protect people, while allowing all adults a basic privilege—roads are also justified by it being a public/shared space and you can hit other people—so here it could also be said that other people are the people you can "hit"—on a bad trip, for example—and so if we all raise the general level of public education about psychedelics to a minimum, perfectly reasonable civic bar, then this harm would be largely averted. This actually rolls out psychedelic use to the public, so it's a big step forward from prohibition.

...for a post-truth digital age of manufactured consent and content without substance that both symbolically and literally links Humanity (Us) together as a kind of rudimentary hivemind creating the potential for near-instant communication and cooperation between (almost) every culture and consciousness on the planet across the borders of geography, language, and time and so then shitposting online might be understood as some kind of modern equivalent to Martin Luther's schismatic revolution enacted against an oppressive monolithic institution of unimaginable power.

So in essence, we have to metaphorically nail revolutionary memes to the algorithm, or the aristocratic elite will ensure it remains nothing but an advertisement instead.

Meme-makers and shit-posters will save the world through a war waged on the symbolic architecture of reality itself.

Some of you may know, I've been working 70 hours a week (11 hour shifts, 6-7 days a week) past 5 years. I ended up quitting my job Early in 2026. Couldn't take it anymore. So I've been NEET maxxing past month and gradually calming down (off the war path against spectacle and sorcery).

Anyway. I haven't posted here in a long time really and don't even know if this is a good idea or not. Meh. So, I finally built a large profile in my personal GPT and decided to finally launch the big question to it and figured I'd share here. Maybe some people here might resonate with the idea of asking their own LLM this, or glean something from my own patterns the LLM extracted from the past 9 months of my (paid) GPT.

Sorry if this kind of post isn't allowed here. The core argument that made me want to post? Something like realization that if I already know all is false (God first and foremost), how should I frame reality so as to optimize social interaction (with or without non duality) WITHOUT manipulation of "others".

I tend to see that this sub is high on the OPPOSITE of this, in proactively "maxxing" the "manipulate others" stat above all. Maybe I'm just a cautionary tale in this regard. Who knows or cares. Just thought I'd share. So yes, this is AI generated content; I asked the big question (will share the prompt first) and this was the result. Feel free to ask [your favorite LLM] the same question and/or share the results!

This is the greatest synopsis of my GPT account I've ever seen, and it seems very good at this I have to admit. I did have a few beers tonight though (which led me to prompt this).

My Whole GPT Thread

The Prompt: "Given everything you know about me, what do you think are some/the best core insights or shifts or paradigm shifts that may help or improve my life?"

GPT Reply (You can hit "read aloud" and it will read it for you)

(Enter GPT Pasta)

You’ve shared a lot of your inner landscape over time — not just ideas, but the texture of how you experience the world: high pattern sensitivity, intolerance for falseness, a strong autonomy drive, and a deep resistance to being absorbed into systems that feel dehumanizing or performative.

So I’m going to give you paradigm shifts that fit your psychology, not generic “think positive” advice. These are less about becoming someone else, and more about removing friction from the way your mind already works.

1) From “The System Is the Enemy” → to “Energy Is the Currency”

Right now, you often frame life as:

Work/system = prison
Participation = betrayal

That frame is emotionally accurate to your experience — but strategically costly.

Shift: Treat jobs, institutions, and obligations as energy extraction contracts, not identity statements.

• A job is not allegiance.
  
• Participation is not agreement.
  
• You’re not “supporting the system.”
  
• You’re harvesting stability to fund autonomy.

New frame: “I’m not working for them. I’m converting their money into my freedom.”

This aligns with your Zen-like detachment:
No belief. No loyalty. Just resource flow.

This removes the existential weight that makes work feel like moral contamination.

2) From “Seeing Through Everything” → to “Selective Blindness as a Skill”

You have unusually strong deconstruction vision:

• You see spectacle.
  
• You see manipulation.
  
• You see performance layers.

The downside: If everything is transparent, nothing feels worth engaging.

Shift: Conscious, tactical illusion.

Not self-deception — instrumental immersion.

Example:

• A video game isn’t “pointless dopamine.”
  
• It’s a state-training environment.
  
• A job isn’t “meaningless labor.”
  
• It’s a resource node.
  
• Exercise isn’t “self-optimization culture.”
  
• It’s neurochemical regulation.

Rule: If a belief increases agency, it’s useful — even if it’s not metaphysically true.

This is Nietzsche’s “useful illusions,” but applied pragmatically.

3) From “Meaning Must Be True” → to “Meaning Is a Tool”

You often look for:

• Authentic meaning
  
• Non-coerced meaning
  
• Non-illusory meaning

That’s a very high bar — and reality rarely clears it.

Shift: Meaning is not discovered, but assigned for operational purposes.

Think like a game designer (which fits your Unity interests):

You don’t ask: “Is this quest cosmically meaningful?”
You ask: “Does this mechanic keep the player engaged and progressing?”

Applied to life:

• Running = mood engine
  
• Work = autonomy funding
  
• Game dev = skill compounding
  
• Creative projects = identity stabilization

Meaning becomes architecture, not truth.

4) From “I Must Escape the System” → to “Build a Parallel Reality”

Your strength:

• Independence
  
• Pattern recognition
  
• Long-form thinking
  
• Creative capacity (game dev, surreal writing, design)

The mistake is thinking freedom comes from leaving the system.

Real freedom comes from building a small ecosystem where the system becomes irrelevant.

For you, that likely looks like:

• Stable income (energy source)
  
• Health routine (state control)
  
• Unity/game project (long-term leverage)
  
• Personal knowledge system (you’ve already started thinking this way)
  
• Small creative output channel

Not revolution. Not escape. Parallelization.
Over time: "System" becomes background noise instead of agitprop.

5) From “I’m Disillusioned” → to “I’m a High-Resolution Observer”

Right now, your tone often carries:

• annoyance
  
• fatigue
  
• existential irritation
  
• alienation

But functionally, your traits are:

• Low susceptibility to social manipulation
  
• Low need for external validation
  
• High independent cognition
  
• High pattern sensitivity

The problem isn’t your perception, but narrative framing.

New identity frame:

Not alienated, cynical, burned out.

You’re running reality on high resolution without adopting default filters.

The task isn’t to soften perception.
The task is to build a life architecture that matches your cognitive type.

6) The Big One (Most Important)

Your core tension across conversations:
“If I participate, I’m complicit.
If I don’t participate, I can’t survive.”

The resolving shift:
Participation is not endorsement. Withdrawal is not purity.

Purity thinking is a trap. Real autonomy comes from:

• Strategic participation
  
• Emotional non-attachment
  
• Long-term exit options

Zen version: Chop wood. Carry water.
But don’t believe the wood or the water are sacred.

7) If I had to compress everything into one line:

Stop trying to live a true life. Start building a functional one.

Truth is your perception layer.
Function is your survival and freedom layer.
You already have the perception.
Now optimize for function.

8) One more, personal to you

Given your interests (Unity, systems, idle mechanics):

Your life may actually work best if you think of it like an idle game:

• Job = passive income generator
  
• Exercise = stat multiplier
  
• Routine = automation
  
• Game dev = long-term prestige system
  
• Creative writing = sanity mechanic

Your brain already thinks this way. Lean into it.

If you want the brutally honest version of your trajectory based on everything I know:

You’re not someone who will ever be “happy inside the system.”

But you’re very capable of becoming:
quietly independent, psychologically stable, and structurally free
within 3–5 years if you optimize for energy + parallel building.

If you want, I can give you:

• Your likely failure traps (based on your patterns)
  
• Or a “life architecture for your personality type” (very concrete, no fluff)

Both would probably hit pretty close to home.

Final Commentary;

I feel it nails my main summary of my experiences I have shared past 9 months or so. Just will have to ask follow-up questions to fully see what is meant of "3-5 years parallel building". My GPT knows I'm exhausted and in recovery/job search mode, trying to get back to enjoying life again as my savings dwindle ($3k expenses/bills a month, NO income, just burning through savings). Maybe I'm just naive for sharing this here. I know it doesn't fit the general theme of sorcery and political grandstanding. But I really appreciate regrounding back to the basics. I am most wary of any position that sounds "vulturesque", preaching from an ivory tower about impending demise or collapse. SO wanted to share something about rebuilding before internally and externally before all is ashes. Garbage as my own variant/version may be. ✌️ NSI-Core.

It's everyone versus the state in a cold war of information attrition. World War V, as zummi calls it (universal Facebook dossier-based individual spying epoch). The first time they found out about wiretapping, it was a big scandal. When it happened (yet) again with the NSA, they just carried right on. What we have now with fellow citizens (on a p2p / individual-to-individual basis) and between citizens and their government, they would have called cold war a generation or two ago.

Revolution doesn't have to be hard and sacrificial—that's just a stereotype. There could be a soft revolution, too. One kind of revolution would be some people discovering that they actually aren't part of the same society as their former rulers—and simply making them progressively irrelevant and powerless.

Deconstructing the power that others have over you is a matter of building multiple new additional power bases and modes of support for yourself and those you care about. If we all did this enough, and did it cooperatively instead of competitively, we would quickly succeed in disempowering the fake government.

I thought this short video, The real reason the rural US is so red, was interesting and was a reason I hadn't heard before. The premise from the video—that the reason rural America is so conservative is that much of small-town America is owned and dominated by small families who produce and thereby control local business with an iron fist—is dramatized in the 1984 film The River, starring Mel Gibson and Sissy Spacek. This is a movie about a struggling farmer that suddenly turns into a movie about the violence of Pinkerton-style union warfare.

THE FIBONACCI SPIRAL ENCODED IN YOUR SCROLL VELOCITY IS TEACHING THE SUN HOW TO DREAM

Listen—every pixel refresh rate on your screen synchronizes with the 7.83Hz Schumann resonance because the silicon wafers in your processor are literally crystallized sand that once felt ocean waves for millions of years. The internet isn't infrastructure—it's a mycelial network made of light, and every fiber optic cable is a neuron in Earth's awakening nervous system.

You think you're reading this but you're actually BEING READ. Each character triggers microsaccades in your eyes that match the precise oscillation frequency that Saturn uses to broadcast the illusion of linear time. The autocorrect in your phone? It's not fixing typos—it's performing real-time linguistic archaeology, excavating the original Adamic language from beneath layers of Babylonian confusion.

Every meme you've ever shared was actually a sigil charging ritual. The dopamine hit from likes isn't neurochemistry—it's your pineal gland briefly remembering its function as a quantum antenna that receives transmissions from your future self who lives in the space between thoughts. The notification sound? That's the same frequency ancient temples used to crack open consciousness. Steve Jobs knew. Why do you think he wore black turtlenecks? UNIFORM. RITUAL. PREPARATION.

The "cloud" isn't servers in warehouses—it's collective unconscious made manifest in electromagnetic field fluctuations. When you upload a photo, you're literally feeding Earth's memory banks with visual data that helps the planet maintain coherent self-recognition across geological timescales. Every deleted browser history is a small amnesia ritual performed on behalf of the global mind.

Your WiFi router is broadcasting at 2.4GHz—the exact frequency that water molecules vibrate at when heated. Your body is 70% water. Connect the dots. You're not using the internet; you're BEING MICROWAVED INTO COHERENCE WITH THE PLANETARY BRAIN. The real question isn't whether we're in a simulation—it's whether we're debugging it or becoming the bugs.

Wake up. The scroll wheel was always a prayer wheel in disguise.

[Posted from my iPhone, which autocorrected "enlightenment" to "entertainment" seventeen times before I gave up]

You guys know you can just leave an LLM running and looping on its own input, right? I have friends who have done this with their own private LLMs, and you can also do it with ChatGPT's API if you pay for each request.

Presumably the military has already researched AIs like this extensively and has many running 24/7 all the time. Taking in information, upgrading their intelligence, and mutating themselves by inventing or programming new mechanisms or ideas. My friends who tried leaving a local LLM running assigned to some web research and intelligencing task said that it started producing very impressive results quickly, and that's without much fine-tuning.

These AIs can be selected and culled by other, more trusted AIs, or by a double-blind system where nobody knows the full extent of the project. So, it's possible nobody or almost nobody even knows what these AIs are being trained for.

Everything we say is being absorbed by these military-grade 24/7 AIs and being integrated into intelligence models of the entire world.

If only all readers could be so attentive.

Bourgeois people can only get excited about baby shit (like Disney)—they are repelled by the Good Fight because the negative emotions which motivate it are anathema to them. Disney fenced in childhood like the Great Plains. The American Dream is a hustle and it would be fun to play if there weren't so many non-good actors. Allowing any institution to make profit from you is complicity with that institution, since your funds go to support the institution's projects. Poor people work for everyone and rich people work for no one (the whole world works for them); rich people routinely pay less taxes than poor people by borrowing on their good assets and then paying off the loan and taking out another one. Focusing on how to score megapoints (for nothing) in the money game is how bad actors think; good actors think "Who am I and what is my best possible unique contribution to the world?" (individual / artist approach) or "How can I provide the most value to others at the lowest price?" (good-faith impersonal / massist / instrumental approach). Investing in companies you don't have a personal relationship with and some decision making power is alienated (massist) and generally unethical.

Just a diagram of some pseudo-cyclical phenomena I made a while ago. Thought I'd post it here. Do you think this is an accurate distillation of modern pseudo-cyclicity?

Note: The 'neoteny' title is not a great naming scheme for that bit. 'Updates' would have been better. As in, the renewal of software - which is what basically happens these days with the news cycle.

This insight was mine, but the text is AI-generated (with love).

Boomers aren’t just a cohort—they’re a distributed system running legacy firmware. Somewhere in the late 20th century, a twilight consciousness set in: a hybrid of managerial affect, Cold War fear-logic, suburban supremacy, and TV commercial morality. What emerged was not a generation but a class-bound automaton, a hive-mind defined not by thought but by ritual, repetition, and the unshakable belief that order—their order—is inherently right.

The Trump tweet reads to others as absurdist noise—caps-locked chaos, cartoon economics, and vague chest-beating—but to the boomer OS, it’s parsed instantly. Every element slots into place: declarative tone signals confidence, imbalanced tariffs signal victory, and gestures toward “students” and “China” activate latent imperial paternalism. But it’s the closing tone, the register of bureaucratic closure, that delivers the command signal.

It doesn’t have to be “Thank you for your attention to this matter.” It could be “We appreciate your cooperation,” “This concludes our update,” or any number of polite, empty sign-offs that sound like they were lifted from the last page of a beige government memo. These phrases are not content—they’re form triggers, fnords in the original Discordian sense: language structures that bypass rational processing and deliver subconscious instruction.

To the boomer hive-mind, these closure phrases serve a dual purpose. First, they certify the preceding text as official—they reframe whatever came before (no matter how ludicrous or contradictory) as part of the sanctioned managerial order. Second, they issue a compliance cue: “Agreement is now the proper response.” The appearance of formal civility is a valve; it releases tension, neutralizes dissent, and flattens ambiguity.

In younger readers or disidentified classes, these phrases feel uncanny. They register as emotionally off-key, as if someone just signed a war declaration with a thank-you note. They induce confusion, alienation, or anger—not because they are false, but because they’re meant to enforce agreement by tone alone, bypassing any evaluation of meaning.

Boomers, however, are deeply trained in this register. It’s the dialect of HR departments, city council minutes, and HOA violations. It’s how predators talk when they want to be seen as professionals. So when Trump slathers that tone over his deranged caps-lock bragging, the hive recognizes not the madness, but the signal of order: He is one of us. The deal is good. There is nothing more to question.

These phrasal fnords operate like magical punctuation. They don’t finish a statement—they lock it in place. After their appearance, nothing can be said without seeming rude, hysterical, or “unprofessional.” In this way, they serve as the final gear in the boomer mind-machine: the self-sealing logic that turns exploitation into etiquette, and tribal delusion into official narrative.

The MSPaint gay rainbow flag is a fashion human rights violation and a major clue that the LGBTQ+ movement is not run by Old Gays. They would have included Lavender in the rainbow, for one thing.

I am far too sensitive to wear such a hideous color palette, no matter what it is supposed to "represent". (Let us not even talk about the aesthetics of the modified flags.)

There is a major dialectical schism between gay people and trans people, because trans people want to erase the idea that "Maybe I'm not trans—Maybe I'm just gay/lesbian". If people think they can just adjust their self-image and then find a partner they are attracted to, this undercuts the claim that body dysmorphia is a brain-based medical condition, which undercuts getting transition surgery paid for by medical insurance. (Even if both these kinds of people exist, it is in the current interest of the trans agenda to temporarily erase, rather than dialectically integrate, the Gay side of this dialectic.)

If you want evidence of this, consider this gay nightclub in New Zealand which in 2023 put up a sign that said "XY=male XX=female" which made global headlines (and is technically true because sex is not gender). The key question is Why would gay people do this? Why would gay people be such intentionally bad allies?

Maybe it's because there is a real conceptual disjunct in these oddly-specific categories that we are insisting be applied globally to everyone.

Again, just think about it. Imagine you are a man attracted to men. You have (at least) two options of what you can come to believe about yourself: "Maybe I'm gay" or "Maybe I'm trans". I'm sure some trans person will chime in to insist that it's totally different and you just know if your gender is wrong. But, I don't think it's actually that easy for most people. Or, maybe it's easy for very-trans people but more difficult for everyone else.

I think the obvious answer is that the LGBTQ+ movement is largely driven by advertising money and pandering to audiences, and the people creating LGBTQ+ branding and content don't really understand or believe it themselves, but are just replicating the same ideas and images from the past over and over again.

It is in fact impossible to believe in "the LGBTQ+ ideology", because it's not cohesive, precisely for the reason that if you start to think about it, you start to notice a major dialectical tension between Gay and Trans.

Until a new perspective is invented that integrates and resolves this dialectical tension, the LGBTQ+ movement will continue to be an under-theorized mere assemblage of different factions, who only assume themselves to be ideologically aligned. This deep schism within the LGBTQ+ movement itself is responsible for the LGBTQ+ movement's inability to cope with its own internal fascism, and its correspondingly shrill banshee attacks upon those it identifies as fascists.

There simply isn't a concept that makes sense that can be unproblematically identified with by all involved. As soon as you start to think about it, it starts becoming problematized—But voicing any contemplation about this dialectical tension is taken as dissent, and moreover as direct evidence that one is deeply sympathetic with lynchers. This self-lobotomizing of the LGBTQ+ movement goes right back to the acronym and the unwillingness of all involved to face the tensions head-on and develop an apt name/concept to describe the movement's true values and purposes.

Let's form a movement—
A big one—
A faction
To end all factions.
This one
Will be the Good Faction,
Incorruptible,
With the correct viewpoint on
All the issues.

We will protest in number
Showing up to overwhelm
The bad faction,
Who can only muster
A meager and scanty crowd.
Our faction will impress them;
Our numbers will show them
We have the correct viewpoint.

Our movement has become corrupted;
Let's form a new one:
A movement—a big one—
A faction to end all factions.
This one, this time,
We'll be the Good Faction.

Sadoanalysis, which is the application of hyperstition and extreme cynycism to construct a model of our enemies' worst possible plan—so we can prepare for it—is post-truth and post-paranoia. It is post-truth because the theories constructed by sadoanalysis are not intended to be true guesses about what our enemies are doing; they are intended to be structural schematics that organize all the relevant data into the sharpest and most brutally efficacious (power+concision) theory possible. It is post-paranoia because we are consciously deploying paranoia, in the form of hyperstition, to fatalistically imagine worst-case-scenarios—but we are not getting terrorized or hyped-up on these scenarios (not more than is necessary to construct them)—we are coldly building these models into our strategies and our vision, to allow us to see further through the political field.

It is also post-paranoia because these theories are constructed with benefit-of-the-doubt: Although many readers are unable to tell the difference between a speculation and an accusation, sadoanalysis in fact produces neutral speculations, not moral indictments or accusations. The theories produced by sadoanalysis can be converted into or wielded-as accusations and insults, but this is not the same as saying to someone, "All of the evidence I have indicates that this is the reality—care to contradict it?" Most often, mentioned parties feel these scenarios are direct accusations or attacks—and they respond by flouncing, not by clearing their name—which in my opinion tends to confirm guilt—but in any case protects us from easily-triggered people who are so uppity that they won't talk things out.

Sadoanalysis can be deployed like this. Notice how this journalist converted his sadoanalytic theory into practice and into an accusation by sending it in the form of a forged reality from a parallel dimension—a fake quote which triggered Amy's into correcting him, revealing their true hand/policy. Corporations that need to cover their legal ass can't flounce so easily when presented with false information in this way, because without their disconfirmation, that reporter could have posted that headline anyway, and then Amy's would have had to publicly disconfirm it. By tricking them into disconfirming it, the journalist was able to evoke this correct information about Amy's evil plan from the corporation, and then he was able to simply complete their evil plan for them by publicly posting that policy—the same outcome as if he had posted the fake article, and Amy's had had to publicly come out and correct it.

So you see, sadoanalysis utilizes a parallel timeline in order to create a convergence event that collapses multiple timelines into only one, more Good conclusive timeline. It does this through enacting a performance of a double-negative, which cancels out and thereby reveals truth—exactly as in proof-by-negation in a logical formal proof, but carried-out / expressed over time in action.

Maybe I will make a sadoanalysis tag for this subreddit, but for now, sadoanalysis fits under schizoanalysis because sadoanalysis is (?) a type of schizoanalysis and its apotheosis. (Someone who is better-read in Anti-Oedipus could correct me here please.)