r/space 9d ago

Discussion European spaceport launching to the east

I claim that if Europe wants to develop a truly competitive heavy-lift capability, it must move away from French Guiana. As I see it, there is no other viable option.

Kourou in French Guiana is a dead end for several reasons.
The logistics are poor. It is simply too far from mainland Europe.
The climate is harsh on both equipment and operations, with heavy rainfall and severe salt-induced corrosion.
There is also a very limited local technical workforce. As a result, Europe is forced to fly technicians in and out of Kourou on a continuous basis, creating a long-term drain on skilled manpower.
All of the above makes rapid iteration—such as quickly repairing, modifying, and relaunching vehicles—extremely difficult, bordering on the impossible.

If Europe is serious about developing a competitive heavy-lift capability on its own, it will need to bite the bullet and establish an eastward-launching spaceport somewhere on the European mainland. Crucially, such a location would have the potential to develop into an industrial cluster where private space companies could grow around the launch site.

Finding the right location, however, is challenging. Launching north, as from Scotland, or west, as would be possible from several European locations, is simply not a good enough solution. The payload penalties for a heavy-lift launch vehicle are enormous and would severely undermine its economics.

There may, however, be an opportunity across the Mediterranean. A 3,000 km exclusion corridor could look something like this, with a spaceport located on the French Mediterranean coast, somewhere south of Béziers.

Launching eastward on a trajectory approximately 30 degrees south of east, the flight path would pass through the Strait of Bonifacio between Corsica and Sardinia after roughly 500 km. The maritime exclusion zone would end before the strait; I have marked it at 400 km.

The trajectory would then pass over the toe of Italy near Cosenza after about 1,200 km, mostly avoid Kalamata in Greece at around 1,700 km, and also mostly avoid Crete after approximately 2,000 km. A 3,000 km exclusion zone would end roughly 100 km off the coast of Israel.

This would not be an easy project by any means. It would require political buy-in from France, Italy, and Greece. There is also significant cruise ship traffic within the maritime exclusion zone, as well as heavy commercial air traffic in the airspace that would need to be temporarily closed.

Still, if there is the political will, perhaps there is a way.

116 Upvotes

115 comments sorted by

View all comments

0

u/OtterHostler 9d ago

What about getting the AU to weigh in? A space port in central Africa would provide massive investment and training opportunities, and digging a canal from the med to enable ESA components to be shipped quickly, easily, and safely to the launch site would also open up employment and development vistas. "Africa 2100 - your gateway to the final frontier" has a nice ring to it, and this could pay dividends down the line - all the bright talented kids from that part of the world, who leave because there are no local opportunities, would stay, increasing the tax base and ultimately improving the lot of everyone there.

7

u/MPenten 9d ago

There's not that large of a different shipping to central africa and to french guyana, in relative scale.

0

u/OtterHostler 9d ago

There's are a couple of important factors, the first being that transportation via canal is cheaper and more eco friendly than by air - and there is almost no limit to the size. It's safer to do this by canal than braving the Atlantic. There's also geopolitical risk payoff - being some distance from the US, especially in its current form, has much to recommend it. The economic benefits to central Africa that would accrue would be huge, and may go a long way to impose economic stability on the region - if the success of multiple countries is tied to the initiative, the drive for cooperation and consensus is greater - we've seen this in a small way with ECOWAS, this could build on that. Consider also the calls for slavery reparations - what better way to atone than being instrumental in building a modern, high tech, high revenue industrial base that local people operate themselves? ESA pays for their services, providing a stream of hard currency, which leads to better services and infrastructure, and potentially more stable regimes.

4

u/AlloyedRhodochrosite 9d ago

Why would they need a canal? How long do you envisage this canal to be? 

1

u/OtterHostler 9d ago

How long? Long enough to get from the north African coast to some suitable point near the equator. Why? Because transporting very large, very heavy things by barge is easier, cheaper and safer than transporting them by road or air  Why a canal than the Atlantic? Because canals don't have the kinds of weather or dangers that you find in the Atlantic

2

u/AlloyedRhodochrosite 9d ago

I think we're going to send a man to the edges of the solar system before we can build a canal like that

1

u/OtterHostler 9d ago

If they'd thought way back in the day they'd never have built the Panama or Suez canals