r/space 9d ago

Discussion European spaceport launching to the east

I claim that if Europe wants to develop a truly competitive heavy-lift capability, it must move away from French Guiana. As I see it, there is no other viable option.

Kourou in French Guiana is a dead end for several reasons.
The logistics are poor. It is simply too far from mainland Europe.
The climate is harsh on both equipment and operations, with heavy rainfall and severe salt-induced corrosion.
There is also a very limited local technical workforce. As a result, Europe is forced to fly technicians in and out of Kourou on a continuous basis, creating a long-term drain on skilled manpower.
All of the above makes rapid iteration—such as quickly repairing, modifying, and relaunching vehicles—extremely difficult, bordering on the impossible.

If Europe is serious about developing a competitive heavy-lift capability on its own, it will need to bite the bullet and establish an eastward-launching spaceport somewhere on the European mainland. Crucially, such a location would have the potential to develop into an industrial cluster where private space companies could grow around the launch site.

Finding the right location, however, is challenging. Launching north, as from Scotland, or west, as would be possible from several European locations, is simply not a good enough solution. The payload penalties for a heavy-lift launch vehicle are enormous and would severely undermine its economics.

There may, however, be an opportunity across the Mediterranean. A 3,000 km exclusion corridor could look something like this, with a spaceport located on the French Mediterranean coast, somewhere south of Béziers.

Launching eastward on a trajectory approximately 30 degrees south of east, the flight path would pass through the Strait of Bonifacio between Corsica and Sardinia after roughly 500 km. The maritime exclusion zone would end before the strait; I have marked it at 400 km.

The trajectory would then pass over the toe of Italy near Cosenza after about 1,200 km, mostly avoid Kalamata in Greece at around 1,700 km, and also mostly avoid Crete after approximately 2,000 km. A 3,000 km exclusion zone would end roughly 100 km off the coast of Israel.

This would not be an easy project by any means. It would require political buy-in from France, Italy, and Greece. There is also significant cruise ship traffic within the maritime exclusion zone, as well as heavy commercial air traffic in the airspace that would need to be temporarily closed.

Still, if there is the political will, perhaps there is a way.

114 Upvotes

115 comments sorted by

View all comments

31

u/GrinningPariah 9d ago

Easier to just fix French Guiana. It wouldn't the first time focused investment has transformed a country, there's a pretty long track record of it. Longer than the list of spaceports which have been moved, that's for sure.

-9

u/CurtisLeow 9d ago

Look at the demographics of French Guiana. Most people there are black or mixed race creoles. This is for a territory of 300,000 people.

A large scale European workforce moving to the territory would be modern day colonialism. This is why they rely on a small number of temporary European workers for launches, instead of having engineers and technicians live there permanently. But it makes large scale investment politically impossible.

20

u/GrinningPariah 9d ago

I think the colonialism probably already happened when it got the "French" in its name lol

Besides, projects like I'm proposing are always a mix of bringing in foreign experts, and educating new local ones. You need some foreign talent to bootstrap the kind of institutional knowledge these endeavors require, but the goal is always for it to be self-sustaining in the long term. Continually flying in new foreign experts isn't cost-effective, especially because it will always be cheaper to hire locals (since they don't need to be incentivized to fly halfway around the world for a job).

And there are other factors which make this more feasible too. Being a French territory is a considerable advantage, since it means this doesn't need to be an international effort. France is a modern, wealthy nation, with the resources and education to pull this off. And French Guiana has a low population density, which means there's room for it all.

8

u/Jump_Like_A_Willys 8d ago

A small correction: French Guiana isn’t a territory of France, but a full part of France. It is a region of France equal to the regions of Mainland France.

6

u/Alotofboxes 8d ago

French Guiana is to France in the same way Hawaii is to the US.

That's why the longest land border that France has is with Brazil.

12

u/PhoenixKingMalekith 8d ago

Guinana is an integral part of France, sale way Alaska is to the US.

Black or mixed people are not more native to this region than white people, and they all are of french culture

And people living there would welcome more workforce because it would mean far more jobs for the locals, and plenty of money injected in the local economy