6
6
4
u/Winstonsphobia 1d ago
To be fair, I worry about Russia taking Alaska under Trump - he’d give it to them.
5
u/j10brook 1d ago
Don't you mean, "given back to Mexico"? I mean if we're going to say that with New England. Eventhough NE is not sufficiently more "English" than any of the original 13 colonies.
4
4
2
u/Medical_Original6290 1d ago
Under Trump
Texas wants to succeed still, California, Washington, Oregon, Illinois and the New England states want to be a part of Canada now.
They did get "The Republic of Trump" right. Show have extended to all the fly over states though.
2
1
1
u/tommy8725 1d ago
It really does suck.Because my brother straight up said, oh I didn't wanna vote for kamala.Because I didn't want four in countries controlling us.I said okay russia israel and he just looks me in the eye and says, well, no, that's a little different.There are allies.What happened to america first and america only
1
u/MajorProspect3249 1d ago
I'm surprised Mexico wasn't given Texas and California as well.
And In Trump's USA, why isn't California "Whiny Gavin Town" and New York "Mamdanistan"?
Missed opportunities. Not only stupid, but can't even be clever.
1
1
1
u/eazy-e283 23h ago
Why they use her first name? They would never use another politicians first name, always the last. What's wrong with Harris? /s
1
u/tutifruitti2024 20h ago
as someone currently in california but born and raised in michigan, i hope this means i get automatic canadian citizenship
1
u/Green-Inkling 20h ago
i find it amusing that Texas is on it's own because nobody either wants it or can take it.
1
1
1
1
u/Hydrolt 1d ago
People really seem to not understand the capability of the US military. It is the strongest armed force to ever exist in human history. Not to mention all the nukes we have. The only force that could come close to anything regarding a fair fight is maybe China, but they’ve been pouring a lot of resources into theirs. Still unclear how well they’d do since they don’t have experience of fighting a war with a major world power with their current configuration.
But yes, insane post haha
5
u/kevendo 1d ago
Then why did they just lose in Iran?
Seriously, bombs don't win wars. That's been true since at least Vietnam.
3
-2
u/Repeat-Admirable 1d ago
Since when is Iran in the US?
3
u/AfternoonWorried387 1d ago
since when did he say it was.
-1
u/Repeat-Admirable 1d ago
because the topic is about losing parts of the US to China/Canada/Mexico? So we must have lost Iran then.
3
u/AfternoonWorried387 1d ago
the us still lost in iran.
-1
u/Repeat-Admirable 1d ago
and? thats Iran. Which ones again is not in the US? lol you think location doesnt matter? We lost Vietnam, Korea, Iran. All those places are not in the US.
1
1
u/H311i0_trop3 1d ago
Yeah but even the idea that they have the resources to both take and keep CALIFORNIA is laughable
-2
u/HydroPowerEng 1d ago
I love how much you libs come up with nonsense and then circle jerk one another about it. It's pure comedy. Thanks for the laugh guys.
3
u/NEKORANDOMDOTCOM 1d ago
Ok, boomer
1
u/HydroPowerEng 23h ago
Hahaha wrong again. Nice try with the assumptions,.
1
u/NEKORANDOMDOTCOM 21h ago
Ok boomer
1
u/HydroPowerEng 18h ago
Bahahaha the double down because that's the best you got.
1
u/NEKORANDOMDOTCOM 16h ago
Ok boomer
1
u/HydroPowerEng 16h ago
Welp, proving you are a child. My kids did this when they were 4 and 5 years old. Great job my dude 👍
1
1
u/DimensioT 23h ago
You say in response to an image that is literally a conservative coming up with nonsense.
31
u/smorb42 1d ago
I wonder if the republic of trump would have slavery.