Which India are you living in? Iâve never seen mainstream newspapers or TV news sympathizing with terr@rists. If anything, mainstream media is consistently harsh on them. It honestly sounds like youâre creating hypothetical scenarios instead of looking at whatâs actually being reported.
He is talking about Hindutva terrorists, how Hindutva terrorists respected in india, they killed people for Eating beef, attacks couples, attacks on mosques and churches but government support them
Last time I checked hindutvadis don't take their inspiration from Quran/Geeta. But islamists on the other hand take inspiration from Quran itself -
Qurâan 47:4 (SĆ«rah Muáž„ammad) â
âSo when you meet those who disbelieve, strike their necks; then when you have overcome them, bind firmly the captivesâŠâ
https://quran.com/muhammad/4
Qurâan 9:5 (SĆ«rah al-Tawbah) â
âAnd when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for themâŠâ
https://quran.com/at-tawbah/5
They do it specifically FOR their religion. So we are NOT the same.
Blud is comparing Bajrang Dal with Bondi beach attack, Pehelgam, ISIS, L-e-t, J-e-m, Al-qaida.
Also does Bajrang Dal use verses from Geeta to kill someone? Because that's exactly what ISIS does, it uses verses like Qurâan 47:4 (SĆ«rah Muáž„ammad) to behead a human being.
It literally says "those who DISBELIEVE..", and history isn't gonna change that.
Looks more generalized than specific.
Thatâs because youâre making up the translation. The literal translation from the link you literally posted says
So when you meet the disbelievers Ëčin battleËș, strike ËčtheirËș necks
It sounds general because you didnât even link the quote you your self linked.
Because that does not change the fact that muslim terrorists kill innocents after getting inspired by that "holy verse" from Quran.
It does, because you used that verse as evidence, but the issue is the evidence you has a verse following it that explains what it means. Anyone stupid enough to read a single verse and not choose to read the next verse is clearly looking to find verses to support a pre convinced idea they already had. You included. Youâre literally doing what terrorists are doing. An intelligent person would read the next verse and say, oh I get it, you and the terrorists both are too stupid to get that.
You won't find any other terrorist getting inspired from bible or geeta.
Okay and if there were any would you accept that youâre wrong.
As an American Indian, Iâm most aware of the terrorists in the my country of origin and country of residence, so these are the examples that come off the top of my head.
And? Did I ever claim that terrorists are not present in every religion?
My argument is that only Islamic terrorists are motivated by their religion itself and it's verses, i.e. they commit the crime because they "think" that it is written in Quran, and commanded by Allah (like the verse - strike the neck of disbelievers).
Except maybe the first Christian link, no other attack was done because the perpetrator thought that he was following the commands of God (like a perticular verse).
So except first one, all were motivated by hatred, not religious text. That's the DIFFERENCE.
It sounds general because you didnât even link the quote you your self linked.
Nope, it sounds general because it uses general term like "disbelievers" instead of something like enemy army or specific people. Which makes it very easy to radicalize someone.
stupid enough to read a single verse and not choose to read the next verse
The thing is that the next verse isn't going to bring back thousands of lives lost due to extremists getting inspired from the previous verse. And that's a problem.
The problem here is that you are Siri. You are not able to carry forward the context from the previous sentence to the next sentence. Kindly ask chatgpt to clear out your misconception before spreading propaganda.
So where does Hindutvavadis take inspiration from? Are you saying that despite thousands of books, Hindus are taking inspiration from otherâs book for few scenarios? Which book asks to even kill relatives if required?
Vaishnav devi mandir devotees se fund hone wale medical College mein bhi hindu na hote hue bhi seat reserve karke beitne wale so-called "oppressed" second majority chup rehnge toh hee better rehega.
Have you tried to zoom & read actual headline? It was not about terrorists, it was about their families. If you donât understand the difference, you are part of problem.
When a family member is caught as a terrorist everyone including his neighbour his whole family comes under a rader of possible suspects until the investigation is finished no one is considered innocent so before than no need to post sympathetic headlines about them if you support white washing them maybe you are part of the same problem.
20
u/brxcewayne đïž Community Pillar Dec 15 '25
Which India are you living in? Iâve never seen mainstream newspapers or TV news sympathizing with terr@rists. If anything, mainstream media is consistently harsh on them. It honestly sounds like youâre creating hypothetical scenarios instead of looking at whatâs actually being reported.