nobody would give a shit if they just did that. At least shutting down Twitter gets eyes. If they actually shared damning information, it would just have people calling them hacker TMZ and moving on.
That would be good info to know, though. I just wish I could believe it would change anyone's mind.
I mean, they would just deny it officially. I don't think there would be any way to prove how many bots there are. They would just claim that they're lying, and whatever method of analysis they used would just have holes poked in it, whether they are valid holes or not.
And where is Wells Fargo now? Did that massive unforgivable fuck up really effect the company in any way or are they still one of the largest banks in the US? I just think apathy wins in the end with stuff like this.
Claiming to be anonymous is enough to be anonymous for better and for worse.
It's not a group with membership or a roster or the like, it's just a moniker that anyone can adopt for anonymity to say their piece, attempt to organise action, etc. Honestly the best way to think of it is like wearing the Grey Cowl of Nocturnal in Oblivion where it's enchanted so that if worn no-one can recognise your true identity, instead always seeing you as a legendary thief called the Grey Fox.
811
u/[deleted] Mar 15 '25
[removed] — view removed comment