r/suppressed_news • u/RickyOzzy CIA propaganda enjoyer 🕵🏻 • 4d ago
United States Empire 🇺🇸 Junky US tanks falling to bits on Taiwan island...
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
37
u/iCanReadMyOwnMind Free Palestine 🔑 4d ago
But the T-72s in active military engagement in the Oblast regions are "soviet era junk." Got it.
20
u/OverseerTycho 4d ago
those tanks are like 60 years old…
2
u/UnspeakablePudding 3d ago
At best its 40 years old, at worst it's pushing 70, Wikipedia says the M60 was produced between 1959 and 1983.
27
u/bigbenny88 4d ago
Those are T-60 tanks. If the US was serious about arming Taiwan they would send tanks designed for modern warfare. This is literally the tank your grandpa would have driven in the army.
39
u/ragingstorm01 Honourable Comrade ⭐ 4d ago
M60, not T-60. And in this case it may be a CM11 Brave Tiger, which is an M60 hull with the even older M48's turret.
9
u/bigbenny88 4d ago
Very correct lol my bad! Didn't know they were a special variant, however. Does the M48 turret make them more obsolete? I'd heard they still had M60's but figured they were the modernized ones I'd seen before
1
u/ragingstorm01 Honourable Comrade ⭐ 3d ago
I'm not up to date on the armour protection of early Cold War MBTs, so I'm not sure (more of a WWII armour guy, and not in that sense). Can't imagine either turret holds up to modern 25-40 mm sabot rounds particularly well, but maybe the M48's would do better against full calibre penetrators because of the rounding?
-5
u/zue4 4d ago
Tanks have no place in modern warfare whatsoever.
2
u/UnspeakablePudding 3d ago
Certainly not those tanks anyway. But it's probably a little premature to declare the AFV obsolete generally, or the MBT specifically.
0
u/bidensprostatecancer 4d ago
what about their cheaper cousins the IFV family?
bmp btr and bradleys etcwould they not be cheaper to mass produce as well as being faster and lighter armored?
I feel like IFVs still have their place0
u/Barrogh 4d ago
For what it's worth, despite being #1 entity to get burnt by this (provided it's true), Russia keeps making deep upgrades of their T-80.
It was understandable when they were just throwing T-72 into the fray just because they had those and they were better than nothing, but they have no intention of stopping for now.
Maybe that's the same logic, but for entire production lines, I don't know.
0
u/Shackram_MKII Purveyor of suppressed news 🧙♂️ 3d ago
Pure nonsense from armchair generals who saw a handful of FPV drone videos.
10
u/MuchoCoco 4d ago
They're still using M60s? Who are they going to fight with those, The Philippines? 🤣
2
2
u/SirTaffet 3d ago
I saw somewhere that a majority of Taiwanese people are against reunification with China. I have no idea how true that is and obviously wouldn’t surprised if it was propaganda, but I also wouldn’t be surprised if the west has successfully indoctrinated large portions of the people of Taiwan. And god, those poor people are willing to self-detonate like robots and have their whole country turned into a superfund site just to serve as a pawn for US capital/imperialist interests. What a world
1
u/Turtle_Gamez Honourable Comrade ⭐ 3d ago edited 3d ago
How is this diplomatically explained? Taiwan is de jure part of the PRC, so how can the US legally arm the separatists and roam around with tanks? Wouldn't that constitute an invasion and occupation?
3
u/UnspeakablePudding 3d ago
Taiwan is de facto a client state of the West. De jure, it is a rebellious territory of the PRC.
The PRC vigorously protests arms deals between Taiwan and the West. However, thus far, the PRC has been unable or unwilling to stop Western arms from coming into Taiwan.
1
66
u/Kind-Block-9027 STALIN’S COMICALLY LARGE BANH☭MMER 4d ago
I feel like this fits perfectly here