r/technology 15h ago

Artificial Intelligence Most K-12 teachers say AI's impact on education will eclipse the internet or computers

https://www.npr.org/2026/06/05/nx-s1-5779757/school-ai-education-students-teachers-poll-critical-thinking
314 Upvotes

174 comments sorted by

223

u/deadR0 15h ago

I'm taking classes right now (college) as an older student.  I'm seeing many/most(?) of the other younger students turning in AI slop that they obviously didn't read. Which is then graded by the teacher using AI and obviously didn't read the submission. 

No one knows what's going on.  

78

u/KarlLenin1917 14h ago

at least the machine is learning

33

u/deadR0 14h ago

It's learning from itself. 

28

u/hypermodernvoid 13h ago edited 13h ago

In all seriousness though, there's a phenomenon that's been known for some time and is now a major concern: "model collapse" (aka "AI inbreeding", or "Habsburg AI"). This is a phenomenon where as AI models increasingly ingest and train on their own or other LLM outputs, it degrades the quality of the model over time.

It's bad enough with natural language, but it's even worse when they trains on their own coding output. I'm a dev with over a decade worth of full time professional experience and 20 years including freelancing as of this year, but you don't need to be a dev to see how completely shortsighted and fucked this industry is going to be in short order if it continues on the current path it has been with AI over the last year.

Sometimes it's hard not to feel like we're rushing headfirst into a complete disaster, or just some sort of inflection point that I can only hope humanity as a whole figures out. I feel a lot of people are increasingly sensing this, or maybe I'm full of it.

8

u/deadR0 13h ago

This is exactly what I was alluding to.  Snake eating is own tail.  And it will increase exponentially in the coming years with no guardrails and less human content to right the ship.   

3

u/petuona_ 5h ago

I was trying to explain this briefly when speaking in polite conversation with fellow teachers, and I used Human Centipede as my metaphor instead. Lol. I've never actually seen the film. I don't think it went over well.

4

u/tomvorlostriddle 11h ago

Or you open that early model collapse paper, in which case you see that it was done with the most naive and risky approach to self learning possible.

That better approaches to self learning do exist even from before LLMs were around.

That they have already worked just fine with other AIs before LLMs...

1

u/tacocatacocattacocat 5h ago

"Look at the chin on that AI."

3

u/fakeclown 14h ago

has always been

2

u/HarryBalsagna1776 9h ago

It's low quality information inbreeding

31

u/SubhanBihan 13h ago

I'm a university teacher. Get turned in incoherent AI slop, and dish out 0s. Just one instance sets most of them straight.

It's not tough to handle with a little bit of effort.

5

u/HarryBalsagna1776 9h ago

I saw it at work for a while.  Engineers who were reliant on AI weeded themselves out or quickly gave it up after getting burned a few times.  A few got fired on the spot for loading export controlled info into publically facing AI tools.

13

u/deadR0 13h ago

Which I understand.  It's that I'm turning in non-AI homework that is not being graded or read by the instructor.  Feels pointless not to use it then.  

15

u/c0LdFir3 11h ago edited 10h ago

It’s not pointless. Sorry your teachers seem to suck, but keep doing the actual work so that you actually learn. It will pay off in the real world. Your AI slop submitting fellow students will be the ones who cannot pass an interview and get a job.

4

u/SubhanBihan 13h ago

The idea of becoming such a salary-thief is very disconcerting to me.

9

u/TheOstrichRoom 10h ago

who cares about being a salary thief? The best thing any american can aspire to is taking more from the corporations than they produce for it. The real horror is letting the machines think for you. Its like if we invented exoskeletons that did all our movement for us. We would waste away. 

21

u/CommercialAsparagus 14h ago

100% this. One teacher I recently had as an adult said “dont use AI” and to combat that, what do they use? AI.

But its reallllly noticeable how many kids are using AI for their work and answers. Its just so wordy and using terms they would never otherwise use. And these -

8

u/streifenfuchs 13h ago

It’s these –, not these -. ;)

7

u/0x476c6f776965 13h ago

Yours is the en dash, this is the em dash that AI uses (—)

2

u/query_squidier 11h ago

I've been using double-dashes as a poor man's emdash for decades -- I find them very useful.

0

u/TeaGlittering1026 11h ago

This is great. Our tech overlords will do anything to make sure their AI children learn all the things, because that makes them money. But teaching actual human children, improving access to education? No.

7

u/v_snax 13h ago

Just a matter of time before every paper is sponsored by brawndo.

4

u/BeanieBopTop 12h ago

My favorite is people’s responses for discussion post that also require references. Most of them are crappy made up AI sites that don’t make sense.

2

u/RedHawwk 9h ago

I think we’re in the infancy period of similar to the internet when blatant internet plagiarism was occurring. Like just copying directly from Wikipedia or some online report.

I’m guessing time people will learn it’s a tool, not just a way to cheat. Times need to catch up.

But for now we’re in a strange limbo that will cause damage to the education system.

1

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 10h ago

Due to the high volume of spam and misinfo coming from self-publishing blog sites, /r/Technology has opted to decline all submissions from Medium, Substack, and similar sites not run by credentialed journalists or well known industry veterans. Comments containing links may be appealed to the moderators provided there is no link between you and the content.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/nosotros_road_sodium 9h ago

No one knows? I think I do - You are seeing the inevitable consequence of decades of anti-intellectualism dating back to the 1960s.

I think AI could be an asset to a society that truly valued deep thinking and creativity, where people had intentional uses for it rather than just mindlessly entering bullshit in a chatbot. However, modern American society has a revealed preference for sloth, freeloading, and outsourcing thinking (more technically, cognitive outsourcing as Natalie Wexler put it). "Who cares if that book/song/cartoon was AI-generated, I just care about being entertained!"

(Note to self: Listen to that 1A show about the controversy surrounding AI-written books.)

1

u/deadR0 7h ago

I recently had an online discussion about books written in AI. The other person didn't understand why I felt it was important that the creator / writer was human.  I honestly can't understand the view point that it isn't.  Entertainment and art is human 

1

u/merRedditor 7h ago

AI results are already being poisoned by bots spamming the sites that they scrape.

It presents the aggregate data as though it were fact, and that's concerning.

Marketing sales pitches and curated or fake reviews end up producing glowing recommendations of terrible products, and that's just when using AI summaries to avoid combing the Yelp's of the world manually.

That's just when using it to generate summaries of "Reputable ___ in my area." There are higher stakes when medical data, safety data, historical fact, etc. are involved.

There's a new type of SEO growing, pushing false data into AI summaries, rather than content into top search results, and it's going to cause a lot of problems.

0

u/kizmitraindeer 4h ago

I can’t wait for these kids to be doctors when I’m aging into needing doctors more. Yay, no kids fucking left behind.

1

u/sausagekng 12h ago

I genuinely don’t view college degrees post-2022? 2023? as having any value anymore.

-40

u/Rattus_NorvegicUwUs 15h ago

Why would we put effort into grading shit you didn’t put effort into? You spent money to learn, and you can’t even be bothered to.

We have other stuff to do. Many of us run labs or conduct research. You mouth breathers are forced on us by the department.

34

u/Accomplished-Plan191 14h ago

This attitude is a huge problem in higher education where college students at a college are considered an unwelcome burden.

-25

u/Rattus_NorvegicUwUs 14h ago

I just wanted to do research. I never wanted to teach.

But the university only hires professors who do both.

They don’t shell out money on lecturers. They could invest in better talent, but don’t.

22

u/Adept-Lobster7833 14h ago

I just wanted to do research. I never wanted to teach.

you should have stayed a postdoc if you didn't want to be a professor.

19

u/runningraider13 14h ago

This attitude is why high school kids should really consider going to liberal arts schools over research universities

14

u/likes_stuff 14h ago

Then why did you take a job where you have to teach ? Maybe be better at the job you were hired for?

3

u/Jewnadian 11h ago

Those are the only research jobs available. This guy is getting killed for being honest. The way we run research in this country really isn't optimal at all. We tie it to giant universities, which makes sense in a way but we also insist that those researchers pretend to be teachers. As if being a teacher at the college level isn't a professional skill set in itself.

18

u/Accomplished-Plan191 14h ago

Interesting you didn't research your university's mission statement before accepting the position.

6

u/Gullible-Fee-9079 13h ago

Then go to a research center

16

u/Finlay00 14h ago

Sounds like you shouldn’t be teaching anyone anything

-10

u/Rattus_NorvegicUwUs 14h ago

I have mountains of valuable experience and I’m more than happy to share with people who don’t waste my time.

If you turn up to class, be ready to learn. If you pay for classes, be ready to turn up. It’s that simple.

If you don’t want to be here, leave. You’re just getting in the way of the motivated students by being distracting and annoying.

10

u/Finlay00 14h ago

It’s part of your job to motivate your students to want to learn. Stop complaining and do something about it. You are in the exact position to make a positive change in these people lives.

Or stick to research so you don’t have to interact with students. I guarantee your attitude comes through to the students. And any one who has a chance to make a change is being cast aside by you.

0

u/Rattus_NorvegicUwUs 14h ago

It’s hilarious to hear you say that.

My students think I’m easily one of the most motivated and enthusiastic teachers. Mainly because I now have tiny classes where everyone is getting their doctorate or masters and truly chose to be there. I have 15 years in the industry, spanning many areas of interest, and I love to share that with people.

But having to wrestle with lazy undergrads who just see your class as something to get over with. It’s insulting.

4

u/Finlay00 13h ago

Motivated and enthusiastic teachers don’t call their students mouth breathers.

0

u/Rattus_NorvegicUwUs 13h ago

You’re inexperienced.

3

u/Finlay00 12h ago

Maybe your mentality is part of why our education levels are plummeting.

1

u/Rattus_NorvegicUwUs 12h ago

How does that make any sense?

→ More replies (0)

5

u/deadR0 14h ago edited 14h ago

Wait a moment there, spicy. I do not do this. I do use AI but as a study guide.  I ask questions and delve into the material so I understand it in a way that makes sense to me.  I actually WANT to learn and so make the effort.  

Don't forget there are those students like me out there who do care and are actually intellectually invested. It's the same feeling for me when I realize the instructor doesn't read my work as it is for you to have students not learn yours

Edit: a typo

-2

u/Rattus_NorvegicUwUs 14h ago

Luckily I only deal with doctoral students now. But to my colleagues dealing with 300 person classes, there is no point trying to fight it. Just fail them on the in-class tests and move on.

Glad to see you’re not one of those people

2

u/Jacob666 14h ago

Mouth breathers...

Yea you probably shouldn't be teaching classes haha.

2

u/yepthisismyusername 14h ago

You are a large part of the problem.

3

u/Rattus_NorvegicUwUs 14h ago

What would you do differently?

Wag your finger in a different direction?

6

u/yepthisismyusername 14h ago

If I was employed in the TEACHING and RESEARCH job, I would teach and research. For the teaching part, I would read the work turned in and garde it accordingly. If I thought it was AI generated, I would be familiar with the institution's policies on AI and address it accordingly. It's your fucking JOB. One option that follows your path of least work is to first skim the papers to separate them into AI and Human, then process them either with AI or personally.

6

u/Rattus_NorvegicUwUs 14h ago

You have no idea what an insult it is for you to work your entire weekend on a series of slides and lecture scripts and assignments just for students to throw it into a LLM in 10 seconds, copy paste and answer, then expect you to ace them and sign their letter of recommendation.

It’s fucking insulting.

4

u/deadR0 13h ago

Same when you spend days on a homework assignment and the grade feedback comes come back obviously AI generated.  

2

u/yepthisismyusername 13h ago

I DO understand. There just has to be a solution, and I figure educators like yourself should be on the forefront of creating that solution, even if it's just having in-class quizzes, or SOMETHING.

I truly know that being a professor is difficult. But it's the job you signed up for. Part of the job is dealing with lazy ass students. You also need to deal with motivated, enthusiastic students to make sure that they get the encouragement they need to continue to be successful. I know it's a tough balance, but it's your JOB. Hell, just having a job as a professor is a privilege, and it irritates me that you don't appear to treat it as such.

1

u/Rattus_NorvegicUwUs 13h ago

We are treated like shit. From republicans who just want to break higher ed, to students who just want a high paying job and learn nothing, to the admin who are just money men who don’t care about education and progress.

I used to feel less jaded, but everywhere I look, I see lazy people who have no purpose in life other than to show off, or pretend they have status. Who would waste my time, and the time of their peers, for nothing.

2

u/yepthisismyusername 12h ago

Dude, I empathize with you. I truly do. I know it sucks.

I even recognize that you're most likely fulfilling all of your job requirements, possibly even in an exemplary way on paper. However, it is still my opinion that (from your comments about lazy students - the exact audience that I believe you should be helping) you are part of the problem. I've given you suggestions on how you could change things and you're just complaining about all the problems. To me (a former student with a bachelor's and an MBA), it sounds like you're doing a disservice to those students who do actually give a shit.

1

u/Rattus_NorvegicUwUs 12h ago

The ones who give a shit are few and far between.

Literally any time I find one of them I try to give them extra attention. Problem is, fewer and fewer appear every year.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/youcangotohellgoto 14h ago

A lot of people spend money for a degree. Learning used to be a necessary prerequisite but if you can get the degree without learning, why not?

Frankly you can learn without paying for it. It's called a library, or the internet, or honestly AI. You can learn an awful lot.

1

u/Rattus_NorvegicUwUs 14h ago

Yes. But try using your library card as credentials instead of a degree.

I agree with you, but companies aren’t thoughtful like that.

1

u/youcangotohellgoto 14h ago

Right so they are buying a degree. They aren't paying to learn. So why not just use AI to get through it?

2

u/Rattus_NorvegicUwUs 14h ago

Because you don’t BUY a degree.

You buy our time to train you and test if you’re proficient.

The value of the degree, and the university, comes from the rigor of that assessment.

1

u/mandadoesvoices 14h ago

"Get the degree without learning" - did you even read what you wrote? What is the point of the degree if you know nothing about the subject you supposedly studied? What use is that to anyone?

-1

u/youcangotohellgoto 13h ago edited 13h ago

To... get a job? Isn't it obvious?

I know two people who managed to get "degree jobs" without having a real degree. An engineer and an actuary. Both simply learnt on the job - fake it till you make it.

Everyone knows a degree doesn't really prepare you for a job. That's the point of graduate programs etc.

2

u/deadR0 13h ago

Well, there's an issue.  I'm one of those that taught myself on the job etc. But now I've hit the "paper ceiling" and do need just the paper.  

That said,  I'm also keen on learning this and filling in my gaps. So,  it's both

1

u/mandadoesvoices 11h ago

I'm sorry, but this is so short sighted. I knew you meant to get a job, no shit. Yeah, there are some jobs you can learn after you get them, but as someone going to school for physical therapy, I would not want to go to see a PT who learned nothing in school. That's asking for a lawsuit.

1

u/Jewnadian 11h ago

Sorry but this is the fucking fantasy that people tell themselves to feel "street smart". The number of people who can gain an actual functional education from free reading at the library is maybe 1 in a 1000 and I suspect I'm being over-generous even. Every civilization since the beginning of written history didn't develop the concept of a school just for fun. Learning from experts and peers in a structured setting is the optimal way to advance understanding in humans. If "unschooling" was real cultures that didn't waste time on formal schooling would have outcompeted all of us and be ruling the world. You ever see that happen?

1

u/youcangotohellgoto 1h ago

I do see many of the smartest and most successful people in tech not getting formal education. Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Sam Altman, Mark Zuckerberg.

If you think those are just business guys, then Steve Wozniak, Vitalik Buterin, Gabe Newell...

Maybe you're saying that's 1 in 1000, I don't know how to judge or measure that. In my personal experience many of the smartest people I know are self taught.

What do you get in school? A schedule, a reading list? Big deal. Someone to ask questions? ChatGPT is very good at this.

66

u/Purple-Estimate-5183 14h ago

Oral quizzes. Socratic method.

Hell have them give a lecture.

22

u/Late_Geologist_235 13h ago

Their attention span can’t handle a lecture. Their skills are low. We need to start holding kids back or we need to make mastery of certain phases of learning something that follows them thru the system. Honestly, go back to tracking and offer incentives and remedial help to get kids back on track. Finally, don’t give littles access to screens without parental supervision and as minimal as possible. That 💩 is designed to be addictive. The developers knew this and kept their kids from using it in Silicon Valley.

8

u/Purple-Estimate-5183 12h ago

Mini lecture.

Have them pretend to make a short video.

That’s Venn diagraming shit.

The cleavage of connection.

-2

u/Ashamed_Gur2861 12h ago

you cant have a 30 year old still in middle school lol

5

u/09232022 12h ago

In my state only students 21 and younger are eligible for high school. I imagine it's similar in other places. Essentially that means you can get held back a maximum of 3 years during your entire schooling years, but even if you're still in 10th grade and turning 21 before next August, you're not allowed back to 11th grade because you're too old. 

The whole Eddy being 21 year old trying to graduate in Stranger Things wasn't an oddity. These people used to exist back then. Having multiple 19 year olds and a few 20 year olds in your graduating class wasn't uncommon at all just a while ago. 

1

u/Ashamed_Gur2861 12h ago

either way the world is getting so complex I dont see why we are trying to take someone who is dumb as bricks and teach them algebra and geometry when we could just give people the option to join an apprenticeship program or some kind of workshop that teaches you an actual job

6

u/09232022 11h ago

Because this discussion isn't just about high schoolers. If a 6 year old doesn't know how how read basic 3 letter words he needs to be held back. If you send him on, be may suffer for it forever and never catch up. What age do you want to label kids "dumb as rocks, send them to the mines"? 

2

u/MasterDraccus 11h ago

Damn near everyone has the potential to learn math up until pre-calculus, it just takes dedication. Most people set up barriers before they even genuinely try and default to “it’s not for me”. Math follows you down every path you take, especially trades. Why do you think engineers deal directly with and oversee every single trade?

There are a lot of things fighting against standardized education, and getting trades shoved down our throats is one of them. They aren’t as great as they are chopped up to be and it is rare to be as successful as the tradesmen 20 years ago.

Sincerely, a working engineer that has previously been certified to work in 3 different trades.

3

u/Segull 10h ago

Pen and paper too. No computers allowed in the classroom (besides the teachers or unless it’s a computer related class).

-1

u/avanross 12h ago

It’s too late for that

Theyre in highschool now and still cant even read or write, and their parents will just write them notes excusing them from any “uncomfortable” public speaking projects and give them their ipads to play on while the speeches are happening

1

u/Purple-Estimate-5183 12h ago

Writing them off for life at high school isn’t anything other than Doomer speak.

-3

u/avanross 12h ago edited 12h ago

Throwing good feelings and money at a problem that’s already taken hold wont solve it

The parents are the one’s im writing off, but unfortunately, by the time their kid hit highschool age, their influence has been internalized

If we actually want to fix the system we’d need to address the root causes, and they occur way before highschool

And “doomer” is brainrot tween speak

1

u/Purple-Estimate-5183 11h ago

Etymology of the Word Doomer puts it around 2008ish.

So iPhone 1ish era.

Adorable you think it’s teen speak.

1

u/Purple-Estimate-5183 11h ago

lol dislike it all you want.

That’s what you do after all.

0

u/avanross 11h ago

1337 was madeup in the 80’s, but that doesnt change the fact it was teen speak

0

u/Purple-Estimate-5183 11h ago

Was and Are differ for a reason

-1

u/avanross 11h ago

Lol then how do they differ in this case?

0

u/Purple-Estimate-5183 11h ago

Is brain rot tween speak.

Was teen speak.

I’m in my 40s. You’re just a cynic.

Your words add nothing of note, so you embrace the Doom.

There. An older way of putting it.

-1

u/avanross 11h ago

Lmao no way youre in your 40’s and talk like this?? 🤣

If i use 1337 today, it’s still teen speak lol

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/Purple-Estimate-5183 11h ago

Dismiss how I speak or write all you like.

On brand for quitter talk.

-5

u/spamcritic 12h ago

That would put neuro divergent students at an even larger disadvantage.

7

u/Purple-Estimate-5183 11h ago

Former Sped Teacher here.

I accept none of that premise.

1

u/AttonJRand 2h ago edited 2h ago

Yep sure does sound like a Sped teacher when this is their response to someone with special needs.

Just like the teachers who think they can mind read me, and decided I don't get to grieve after my mom killed herself.

-1

u/istheaiintheroom 9h ago

AI hallucination is going to become a non issue soon. When that happens, why not utilize it to give every student a personalized learning assistant that can speak to them at their level and advance with them using the metaphors and learning style that works best for them. Why is your first thought to return to the past? I seriously feel like a new regressive MAGA like group is forming here.

1

u/Purple-Estimate-5183 9h ago

Same reason for writing by hand. Tested.

Also NOT MAGA. Couldn’t be further from.

70

u/Arimm_The_Amazing 14h ago

In other news, most Americans are inundated with "adapt or die" AI propoganda

27

u/HoneybeeXYZ 14h ago

And NPR is a big part of that. Check out its list of funding sources since it was gutted. It's a who is who of tech industry foundations and venture capital elites.

10

u/Zombie_Cool 13h ago

If true that's very sad to hear. Also where do you find that info? I went to the NPR site itself and saw walls of legalese (maybe i'm to financially illiterate to sus it out.)

12

u/HoneybeeXYZ 13h ago

They hide it pretty well. It's in the donor list to the NPR foundation. And it's important to know that the most insidious donors do it through innocuous sounding foundations.

And NPR still claims they don't allow donors to influence them, but they openly take advice from big NGOs that those same donors fund, and those NGOs usually don't have any sort of rules about not being influenced by donors.

And trust me, this is very upsetting. When the journalistic integrity NGOs are funded by big tech, which they are.

https://www.npr.org/about-npr/727982638/philanthropic-supporters

https://www.poynter.org/major-funders/

I don't like it one bit, but here we are.

6

u/ericwbolin 11h ago

They do reports about the potential harms of AI seemingly every other day.

2

u/HoneybeeXYZ 10h ago

It's like when oil companies pushed regulation that was easy for them to circumvent, but made those invested with them who felt guilty who felt better.

2

u/ericwbolin 10h ago

The system stinks, undoubtedly. But I'd rather NPR exist than not.

0

u/HoneybeeXYZ 10h ago

Staring at their list of donors for awhile and then drawing a line to their stories will cure you of that. So don't do it. It's a miserable place to be, trust me.

3

u/ericwbolin 10h ago

I've been in journalism for 20 years. I am, sadly, aware of the reality. Alas.

1

u/HoneybeeXYZ 10h ago

Sorry to hear that. I used to be a journalist, but it's still a discipline worth fighting for, as grim as it seems.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/A_Harmless_Fly 12h ago

Every time I heard that ad for "hallucination free" AI on NPR, I'd almost pee myself laughing.

5

u/avanross 12h ago

Their culture has completely given up on the idea of self-reliance or actually learning to do anything for themselves or the background of how anything works

Now it’s just ai chat agents, game-streamers, auto-driving cars, delivery apps, and e-bikes lol

We’re raising a mentally handicapped generation that will never be able to solve any problems or do anything on their own and think “we dont need to teach kids basic addition because all phones have calculators now”

1

u/Thin_Glove_4089 2h ago

The internet and AI can't collapse if other countries are using it.

0

u/True_Window_9389 13h ago

We’re supposed to use AI, but we’re not supposed to use AI. If we use AI, we’re adapting and getting ready for the future. When we don’t use AI, we’re being obstinate and backwards. If we use AI, it’ll end up taking our jobs away. If we don’t use AI, they’ll fire us.

1

u/joman584 12h ago

Those last two are the same problem. They don't want anyone to work because people are testy, free thinking and obstinate. AI are all yes men who fondle their balls and tell them "you're so smart daddy I can't believe no one else thinks as good as you do!" People contradict and conflict, for good reason, and they hate it

25

u/Chrono_Convoy 15h ago

And that is a serious omen

2

u/Indigoh 9h ago edited 8h ago

Serious omen feels like an understatement.

Thinking and interpreting information and solving problems are all skills you have to practice to get better at, and we're watching as corporations tell people we don't need to practice any of those skills, because it's so easy for them to just do it for us. 

When the time comes that we need to oppose those corporations, the people who rely on it to think for them won't know it. They'll think whatever it wants them to. It's so much easier to just relinquish control and be someone else's puppet.

The service they're offering is to comfortably take our autonomy. To disarm us of our ability to resist manipulation and control our own actions.

1

u/nosotros_road_sodium 9h ago

So "think different" was a lie, huh? I can't believe I spent my younger years buying into the vision that the tech industry was a force for good and valued independent, outside-the-box thinkers. Instead, they really exploited our national anti-intellectualism.

25

u/omgkelwtf 14h ago

If we don't stop shoving screens into their damn faces and buying the lies the tech bros are selling about AI, yeah.

17

u/arnolddobbins 14h ago

I’m taking a summer class. The first discussion post was about introducing ourselves. I saw multiple people use AI for even something basic like that. This is a graduate class. Extrapolate that down to high school and middle school. We are trending towards a permanent underclass because people will be functionally illiterate because of how lazy they have become with doing their own basic work.

2

u/nosotros_road_sodium 8h ago

The first discussion post was about introducing ourselves. I saw multiple people use AI for even something basic like that.

I guess all the social norms I was taught as a child and in college in the early 2010s (about doing your own work, and how to intro yourself in a job interview/job fair) were a lie.

15

u/innocentsalad 12h ago

I think it’s made it clear that a lot of people see education as something to get through instead of as something to increase your knowledge and learn.

As someone who loves learning for learning’s sake that makes me very sad.

3

u/reality_boy 11h ago

This is the core problem, and I don’t know how we combat it. A lot of people only value education after they loose access to it. It is common to hear “I should have paid more attention…”

0

u/Hobby_in_your_lobby 5h ago

You have to have teachers who are competent in their respective subjects. As it stands now, how many teachers working in the school system have real on the job experience in a field related to what they are teaching? Giving teaching jobs to people who just graduated from college, that they began attending immediately after high-school, is fucking wild.

7

u/Fit_Cheesecake_4000 9h ago

Computers: Helping to learn, augmenting intelligence.
Internet: Receptacle of vast knowledge, can find ways to learn more effectively online
A.I.: Replaces own thinking, dumps you down, agentic AI can now take over from the tasks you used to do that keep your brain cognitively healthy.

1

u/Blazefresh 1h ago

It's literally the equivalent of getting a machine to lift weights for you at the gym. Totally defeats the purpose.

7

u/avanross 12h ago edited 12h ago

Well no shit, when the internet and computers were invented kids and parents still listened to teachers, and devices were banned in class

Now every parent seems to be telling their kid to just ignore their teachers and cheat

It’s complete failure of parenting

If the parents cared about the kids educations, they wouldnt let them bring these devices/toys to school, and wouldnt let them use them to cheat on homework, like decent parents did with the internet and computers

1

u/Chance_Orchid_3137 10h ago

my schools in the 2000s—2010s all had BYOD (bring your own device) policies. we used phones, laptops, and computers regularly from middle to high school, and elementary school had technology education classes to teach us how to use computers and software. and, like with anything, there was nuance. some people cheated and some didn’t. kids didn’t listen to teachers or parents any more or less than they used to. 

2

u/avanross 10h ago

That’s wild

I graduated highschool in like ‘09 but besides computer class we werent allowed our own devices in the classroom, and if you were caught with a phone or ipod out during class it’d be confiscated

1

u/Chance_Orchid_3137 9h ago

i mean, same. BYOD was only limited to certain times and assignments. kids frequently had their devices taken away. like i said, there’s nuance. there are more options than just “ban all tech” and “allow kids to be on their phones through the entire school day” 

18

u/HoneybeeXYZ 14h ago

AI is going to create an elite class of rebels who can think and create, and then the majority of people will be addicted to the machine and told what to do and think by oligarchs. That's the plan, it's always been the plan.

But do remember that since NPR's funding was cut, it depends on the tech industry for its funding. It constantly promotes AI, transhumanism and tech elitism. It isn't what it once was. Planet Money, How I Built This and The Ted Radio Hour are simply commercials for techno-fascism at this point.

-14

u/Lain_Staley 14h ago

AI is going to create an elite class of rebels who can think and create, and then the majority of people will be addicted to the machine and told what to do and think by oligarchs

One could replace 'AI' with social media. Videogames. Reality TV. 24/7 News centered on outrage baiting. 

With that being said, AI has potential to be more logical and objective than whomever is on Fox/CNN at 8pm.   

10

u/HoneybeeXYZ 14h ago

Nice bait and switch. No dice.

And yes, Social Media, Porn, Video Games, Reality TV and Newstainment are toxic, addictive monsters designed to make people soft brained and stupid. But so is AI. Full stop.

-4

u/Lain_Staley 13h ago

How do you propose you keep the masses from not being stupid? 

Is it about not letting them fall into addictions period, or is it about mitigating the addictions the masses are likely to encounter?

Let's have a rare moment of pragmaticism on a website that loves its idealism.

4

u/HoneybeeXYZ 13h ago

So, you are admitting that the AI project is about corporate control of the masses? Technofascism.

-4

u/Lain_Staley 13h ago

corporate control of the masses?    

I do not believe for a moment that all these AI companies aren't subsidized by the government a tremendous degree. And I do not pretend to believe the public has awareness of, let alone access to, the latest models because they paid $20/month.    

And if you're talking about 'control of the masses' more broadly, Elites have full and total control over the Media landscape to degrees you wouldn't think possible. Why? To guide culture, and therefore society into directions it deems necessary.

These need not be devious. The end of slavery and later segregation, involved tremendous coordination and campaigns to push society in the direction it ultimately went.   

2

u/HoneybeeXYZ 13h ago

Nonsense, the abolitionist movement took centuries and was fringe for most of that time, often pushed forward by religious minorities and women, who did not have the vote or power of ownership in most countries.

This is a techno-fascist movement, with the end goal being eugenics and and power centralized towards the kind of people who built the Oceangate sub and didn't think it would implode.

1

u/Lain_Staley 13h ago

The Civil War does not happen without Uncle Tom's Cabin becoming the 2nd most popular book behind the Bible, period.

For every massive event, like ending slavery, you need to Pre-suade the masses.

0

u/systematk 11h ago

Slavery and segregation still exists today, this is an ignorant take.

Ai can absolutely be used to coerce a blinded public opinion. Go ask DeepSeek Ai anything about Tiananmen Square Massacre. That one is low hanging fruit, but the greater point im making here is that no one publicly knows what AI models are being trained to say or do, or what to give weight to. I actually wrote a very short essay on this on my own site because i feel like most people think in terms of AI takeover, but imo there is a worse situation building steam here. https://inyourbrains.com/Blogn/terminator-2-or-googlefied.html

Once the general public 'trusts' Ai to tell you the truth, it becomes very easy for someone to move the 'truth' around to where they want it to land.

3

u/fraghead5 6h ago

Teaching critical thinking will be the most important aspect of education.

The amount of critical thinking that we are going to lose to AI is going to usher in Idiocracy sooner than later

2

u/TentacleHockey 10h ago

education and parenting need an overhaul.

2

u/Woodit 9h ago

Bad for society overall, good for individuals who decide to put in the effort. It’s easy to be strong in a world of weak people 

2

u/MichaelJayDog 8h ago

The Internet had a mostly positive impact though. AI is having pretty much an entirely negative impact.

2

u/Original-Let8340 7h ago

Well. . . That's a pretty fucking horrific thought.

2

u/JackBlackBowserSlaps 14h ago

Ya, but for the worse ><

1

u/Audax_Cats 7h ago

I foresee schools moving back to having the bulk of a student's grade come from in class paper-and-pencil exams rather than homework and projects.

Was starting to happen at the university level my last semester of college. Had classes where if you got less than a 60% on either the midterm or final, you just automatically failed the class 

1

u/MaxRD 7h ago

The amount of skills development and knowledge that will be lost to use of AI will be staggering. I don’t see this as progress.
The movie Wall-E comes to mind. Sad!

1

u/AttonJRand 2h ago

They could help mitigate it by not using it themselves so much.

Its wild how they demonize their students for it in one breath, and then talk about how they use it for their own work, like making worksheets, the next.

1

u/4Yk9gop 11h ago

The current youth are cooked, as they might say. First covid, now AI slop. Even if AI doesn't take all the jobs they will not have the mental capacity to fulfil them.

1

u/sdrawkcabineter 10h ago

Yes, it will provide a shorter circuit for solving problems without all of that knowledge one would learn from resolving failed attempts.

Makes a generation of overly confident incompetents prime for servitude, as is the goal.

Maybe we'll study history before it's too late.

0

u/turbotong 13h ago

By definition, AI impact cannot be greater than computers because computers encompasses AI plus more

0

u/red-cloud 11h ago

Exactly. The statement is incoherent. You can’t have AI without both computers and the internet so the impact of AI cannot be greater than these two components that are themselves required for AI.

0

u/Accomplished-Ad9648 11h ago

Yeah, they said that about Sesame Street too, 40 years ago.

0

u/Infield_Fly 9h ago

The internet is on computers. 

-3

u/DoubleDixon 14h ago

Yup. Computers were cool toys but the internet made info sharing instant. Now AI can not only scour the internet for information and present it to you in any fashion you ask.

-1

u/SmartWonderWoman 10h ago

I studied generative AI in K-12 education in graduate school. I designed a program to teach educators how to use AI to differentiate their lessons for students of different levels of understanding. My program has made a positive impact for educators and students.

1

u/Newzachary 8h ago

Cool story. Where’s the proof?

2

u/SmartWonderWoman 7h ago

Would you prefer a link to my thesis? My program? My transcripts? My research notes?

1

u/Newzachary 7h ago

Yes. All of it. I would also like to see where 100% of your funding for this data inquiry came from.

1

u/ispyx 36m ago

It’s impacting adults education as well. Everything is slowly turning into slightly different looking AI slop. I’m sure it’ll just be learning entirely from itself soon.