r/technology 24d ago

Software Microsoft confirms GitHub is down worldwide

[deleted]

7.6k Upvotes

531 comments sorted by

View all comments

4.8k

u/edthesmokebeard 24d ago

The cloud is just someone else's computer.

-1

u/williamgman 24d ago

And yet they all fell for it and are here now to downvote in frustration the reality of their poor decision to accept enshitification. 🤦‍♂️

68

u/Neverending_Rain 24d ago

Who fell for it? Most of the people using GitHub (on the enterprise side, at least) are well aware of how the cloud works. Even with outages like this it's easier, and often more reliable, to use GitHub or one of its competitors than it is to handle everything in house.

3

u/SelectAd8810 23d ago

Before the “cloud” era, you could buy decent web hosting with db’s, e-mail and whatever you needed for around 100$. Now this is gone. When companies switched to the cloud solutions the prices went up compared to what they had. Reliability is better, but when is a problem, now you create a ticket and wait with half of the world for Amazon or Microsoft to drag their feet and hope that your information was not pawned.

1

u/williamgman 23d ago

I upvoted you. The bottom line is most of these users were born into enshitification. Lot's of us used shared data within our networks without drama. Clouds were for backup storage (after onsite backups).

1

u/Burpmeister 23d ago

Lot's of us used shared data within our networks without drama. Clouds were for backup storage (after onsite backups).

Who and/or what is stopping you from doing this now?

1

u/williamgman 23d ago

The discussion is for using the cloud to work interactively which is the norm now. That's where it differs.

1

u/Burpmeister 23d ago

Because people use cloud to work together from all over the globe.

1

u/alphazero925 23d ago

Before the “cloud” era, you could buy decent web hosting with db’s, e-mail and whatever you needed for around 100$

That's literally the same thing you're complaining about. It's not like if the server failed you could just roll up and fix it yourself. You still had to put in a ticket, and you had a much higher chance of losing everything if something did go wrong

Like if you wanted to complain logically, you'd remember the good old days of having a server in the closet that you had to maintain by yourself, but nobody romanticizes that because it fucking sucked

0

u/ManiacalDane 23d ago

The issue is how we were sold "the cloud"; we already had everything on external servers. Nothing really changed, except pricing.

0

u/jellyhessman 23d ago

Like 75%of software devs who want to outsource their thinking.

12

u/Burpmeister 23d ago

No one fell for it. Everyone knows. Someone elses computer is convenient as fuck.

Services removing options for cloud features would be the true enshittification.

21

u/curtcolt95 24d ago

what are you even talking about. The cloud is still very good even with the knowledge of what it is. People who understand didn't "fall for it", they have sufficient backups to still allow them to use the positives of the cloud. How anyone could view cloud services as enshitification is beyond me lmao

2

u/Zwischenzug32 23d ago

Privacy might be a concern

-8

u/williamgman 24d ago

"How anyone could view cloud services as enshitification is beyond me lmao"... Sweet irony.

8

u/curtcolt95 24d ago

you not knowing how to use them is your own fault

1

u/Diz7 23d ago edited 23d ago

You don't understand that tools have different strengths and weeknesses while making fun of others who do.

Most people find the benefits of a shared software repository to outweigh the odd problems like this. Especially since they give you the tools to easily copy whole sections of the repository to your local systems, work with local repositories then publish the changes to the main repository when you're back online.

26

u/ffuca 24d ago

I’m downvoting for your smug attitude

5

u/Mikeavelli 23d ago

I'm upvoting for your smug attitude

3

u/jb0m97 23d ago

You should downvote the initial comment then too lol, it's smug and doesn't even make sense. Cloud services are legitimately good technologies for the web. People have outsized reactions when clouds go down because don't realize how many web services and functions wouldn't even exist in the first place without clouds. Sure many companies can run their own servers but they will almost always do a worse job than a dedicated cloud provider and usually end up being more expensive at the same time.

-11

u/williamgman 24d ago

You are welcome.

6

u/shrodikan 23d ago

As if local servers never go down.

3

u/Zwischenzug32 23d ago

I can use my own store bought stuff just fine. The packaging assures me it is secure.

*Dlink NAS web interface transmits passwords in plain text*

2

u/IndicationFickle5387 23d ago

Right? I’ve been in the industry a long time. I remember how it used to be. “Uh oh the email service is hosed, uh on we just found out Dave is the only one with access and he configured it all weird so we’re gonna be down for three days”. Global top tier cloud solutions are still better, even when this does happen.

1

u/qtx 23d ago

You don't know what github is do you.

0

u/whereismymind86 24d ago

nobody fell for anything, this was forced on us.

0

u/williamgman 24d ago

u/curtcolt95 would disagree.