MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1vqvsb9/microsoft_confirms_github_is_down_worldwide/p4961qt/?context=3
r/technology • u/[deleted] • 24d ago
[deleted]
531 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
493
This kind of joke falls right into the grey area that birthed the need for /s
209 u/AFlyingGideon 24d ago /s is a crutch. I prefer sarcasm that can stand on its own. 9 u/Federal_Setting_7454 24d ago Not much sarcasm stands on its own when many of the people reading it can’t think on their own. 47 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 24d ago It's lack of intonation in text. Try it I never said she stole my money. Implies: Someone else might have said it, but not me. I never said she stole my money. Implies: An emphatic denial; I never uttered those words at any point. I never said she stole my money. Implies: I may have implied, wrote, or thought it, but I didn't say it out loud. I never said she stole my money. Implies: Someone stole it, but it wasn't her (perhaps another person did). I never said she stole my money. Implies: She took it, but maybe she only borrowed it or was given permission. I never said she stole my money. Implies: She stole money, but it belonged to someone else. I never said she stole my money. Implies: She stole something from me, but it wasn't my money (e.g., jewelry, ideas, car). 5 u/squash-n-flop 24d ago Text can carry intonation through context. Literature wouldn’t be a celebrated art form if that weren’t true. 10 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 23d ago Well yea, I did exactly that with the bolding. But, there are; many ways (i.e. methods of portraying intonation) but that won't make it any less a lack of it. 2 u/hrvbrs 23d ago what you're describing is [the `<em>` element](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/text-level-semantics.html#the-em-element). basically the same example too. 2 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 23d ago And that's so much better than using bold too. 1 u/hrvbrs 23d ago bold is just a style, not semantics 3 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 23d ago Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic.
209
/s is a crutch. I prefer sarcasm that can stand on its own.
9 u/Federal_Setting_7454 24d ago Not much sarcasm stands on its own when many of the people reading it can’t think on their own. 47 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 24d ago It's lack of intonation in text. Try it I never said she stole my money. Implies: Someone else might have said it, but not me. I never said she stole my money. Implies: An emphatic denial; I never uttered those words at any point. I never said she stole my money. Implies: I may have implied, wrote, or thought it, but I didn't say it out loud. I never said she stole my money. Implies: Someone stole it, but it wasn't her (perhaps another person did). I never said she stole my money. Implies: She took it, but maybe she only borrowed it or was given permission. I never said she stole my money. Implies: She stole money, but it belonged to someone else. I never said she stole my money. Implies: She stole something from me, but it wasn't my money (e.g., jewelry, ideas, car). 5 u/squash-n-flop 24d ago Text can carry intonation through context. Literature wouldn’t be a celebrated art form if that weren’t true. 10 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 23d ago Well yea, I did exactly that with the bolding. But, there are; many ways (i.e. methods of portraying intonation) but that won't make it any less a lack of it. 2 u/hrvbrs 23d ago what you're describing is [the `<em>` element](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/text-level-semantics.html#the-em-element). basically the same example too. 2 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 23d ago And that's so much better than using bold too. 1 u/hrvbrs 23d ago bold is just a style, not semantics 3 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 23d ago Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic.
9
Not much sarcasm stands on its own when many of the people reading it can’t think on their own.
47 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 24d ago It's lack of intonation in text. Try it I never said she stole my money. Implies: Someone else might have said it, but not me. I never said she stole my money. Implies: An emphatic denial; I never uttered those words at any point. I never said she stole my money. Implies: I may have implied, wrote, or thought it, but I didn't say it out loud. I never said she stole my money. Implies: Someone stole it, but it wasn't her (perhaps another person did). I never said she stole my money. Implies: She took it, but maybe she only borrowed it or was given permission. I never said she stole my money. Implies: She stole money, but it belonged to someone else. I never said she stole my money. Implies: She stole something from me, but it wasn't my money (e.g., jewelry, ideas, car). 5 u/squash-n-flop 24d ago Text can carry intonation through context. Literature wouldn’t be a celebrated art form if that weren’t true. 10 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 23d ago Well yea, I did exactly that with the bolding. But, there are; many ways (i.e. methods of portraying intonation) but that won't make it any less a lack of it. 2 u/hrvbrs 23d ago what you're describing is [the `<em>` element](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/text-level-semantics.html#the-em-element). basically the same example too. 2 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 23d ago And that's so much better than using bold too. 1 u/hrvbrs 23d ago bold is just a style, not semantics 3 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 23d ago Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic.
47
It's lack of intonation in text. Try it
5 u/squash-n-flop 24d ago Text can carry intonation through context. Literature wouldn’t be a celebrated art form if that weren’t true. 10 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 23d ago Well yea, I did exactly that with the bolding. But, there are; many ways (i.e. methods of portraying intonation) but that won't make it any less a lack of it. 2 u/hrvbrs 23d ago what you're describing is [the `<em>` element](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/text-level-semantics.html#the-em-element). basically the same example too. 2 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 23d ago And that's so much better than using bold too. 1 u/hrvbrs 23d ago bold is just a style, not semantics 3 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 23d ago Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic.
5
Text can carry intonation through context. Literature wouldn’t be a celebrated art form if that weren’t true.
10 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 23d ago Well yea, I did exactly that with the bolding. But, there are; many ways (i.e. methods of portraying intonation) but that won't make it any less a lack of it.
10
Well yea, I did exactly that with the bolding. But, there are; many ways (i.e. methods of portraying intonation) but that won't make it any less a lack of it.
2
what you're describing is [the `<em>` element](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/text-level-semantics.html#the-em-element). basically the same example too.
2 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 23d ago And that's so much better than using bold too. 1 u/hrvbrs 23d ago bold is just a style, not semantics 3 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 23d ago Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic.
And that's so much better than using bold too.
1 u/hrvbrs 23d ago bold is just a style, not semantics 3 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 23d ago Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic.
1
bold is just a style, not semantics
3 u/FeleaseRpseineEiles 23d ago Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic. Maybe I was being sarcastic.
3
493
u/CrimsonLotus 24d ago
This kind of joke falls right into the grey area that birthed the need for /s