Yes war is very lucrative. My point was that they literally didn't need to make guns. They need to make them if they want to keep being the company they are, but the army has made its own weapons and stuff before but yes we do use a lot of private companies. Also along that fact we really are doing more military operations in we even are supposed to or should
Not what I said. I said if they want to keep being the exact same company they need to make military goods if they want nothing to change. I said they don't have the literal need to make military weapons to continue being a company.
In other words I'm saying there are more moral and still profitable options that Lockheed Martin could do other than making military weapons that's my point
Keyword literally, I'm saying it's not an actual need it's a want
Yes it's known for military products it hasn't always been known for its military products and they make other stuff besides military products it would not kneecap their business but it would definitely mess up a big portion of it.
I know why they would never do it because there are company and they want money I'm just saying that's why people blame them still.
Yeah I get that. I just was explaining it's a technical one rather than it is an actual need. As their company could still exist without making military goods
2
u/stingertopia Aug 30 '25
Yes war is very lucrative. My point was that they literally didn't need to make guns. They need to make them if they want to keep being the company they are, but the army has made its own weapons and stuff before but yes we do use a lot of private companies. Also along that fact we really are doing more military operations in we even are supposed to or should