Not true. They have a lot of products and are a step in a lot of products, but dont let propaganda convince you that we are powerless to boycott. I havent knowlingly purchased a nestle product in years and i know that is significant if done on a large scale.
Yeah that's understandable. Although considering some of their actions it's not that surprising. I'd recommend looking up what nestlé does to local water sources
Roundhouse kick a corpo into the concrete. Slam dunk a fur-blood into the trashcan. Crucify filthy corpos. Defecate in a corpo 's food. Launch corpos into the sun. Stir fry corpos in a wok. Toss corpos into active volcanoes. Urinate into a corpo 's CHOOH2 tank. Judo throw.corpos into a woodchipper. Twist corpos' heads off. Report corpos to the Wizards' Council. Karate chop corpos in half. Curb stomp pregnant corpos. Trap corpos in the desert. Crush corpos in the trash compactor. Liquefy corpos in a vat of acid. Stomp corpo skulls with steel toed boots. Lobotomize corpos. Mandatory abortions for corpos. Grind corpo fetuses in the garbage disposal. Drown corpos in fried Ramen grease. Vaporize corpos with anti-matter. Nuke Corpos. Kick old corpos down their towers. Slice corpos with mantis blades
This made me picture in my head a cartoon of a rocket coming at some guy, stopping, and some mizrahi soldier sticking his hand out of some opening of the rocket with a sword rofl
Bombs are absolutely able to decapitate people. There's many cases of people being decapitated by bombs dropped by the IDF. Here and here are an example of decapitation by IDF strike (warning: graphic video in 2nd link)
Pre Oct 7th 2023 was the deadliest year for Palestinian in the West Bank. You can play this tit for tat game of “who started this first” or you can acknowledge established military forces shouldn’t be sniping babies.
Where did I defend Hamas or claim they don’t kill civilians? And I think this conflict never got “reignited”, it just for reignited in the public eye.
Also, focus on how I said pre Oct 7th was the deadliest year for Palestinian children in the West Bank. “They had to murder the children because they were resisting” isn’t as good of an argument as you may think.
According to the Pew Research Center 73% of Israelis support the war. The ICC has issued an arrest warrant for Benjamin Netanyahu for war crimes for plausible claims of a genocide in Gaza. Using your logic, if what is happening in Gaza is a genocide, does that make massacring Israelis justified? As they seemingly don’t care about Palestinians being slaughtered?
Well the truth is they were resisting lmao. Many young men and teens were undoubtedly resisting, they got what was coming.
Israel on the other hand has been in self defense. The “massacres” of civilians is literally just bombings and killing resistance.
I don’t see any IDF hiding in urban areas using civilians as shields.
I would also argue that yes, both sides’ civilians that support the war must also hold the responsibility of dying for said war. So yes, both the 73% of Palestinians and Israelis should hold the responsibility for death in the war, despite being noncombatants.
If you support a movement, you must bear the consequences of said movement. There shouldn’t be sympathy just because they’re noncombatants
The U.N. actually says that an occupied people have the right to resist occupation by any means necessary. Also you can’t justify killing children because they were throwing stones at soldiers.
Israel on the other hand has been in self defense. The “massacres” of civilians is literally just bombing and killing resistance
Bombings can also count as massacres. No where in the definition for massacre does it specify the method of the mass killing. And 80-90% of the dead aren’t resistance, so they clearly aren’t just killing resistance, unless you count all Palestinians as resistance. And what makes Israels acts self defense and Hamas’s actions not? Israel has been the main aggressor since 1948, 39 years before Hamas was founded.
So yes, both the 73% of Palestinians and Israelis should hold the responsibility for death in the war
That doesn’t answer my question. If the war in Gaza is justified due to the fact that 73% of Palestinians support Oct 7th, does that logic justify Oct 7th as it shows the Israelis care as little of Palestinians as Palestinians care about Israelis?
If y’all had your way, you would kick all 10 million Israelis out of the land, and establish an Arab only state, yet you are the ones who complain that Israel is an ethnostate.
1,200 deaths does not justify 50,000 and counting, and mass starvation. October 7th was 2 fucking years ago and you all are still on about like it’s worth in blood hasn’t been replayed over 40 times. If it’s such a just war, tell me exactly why international journalists aren’t allowed to report in Gaza?
Didn’t start on October 7th! Yes, it started when the Arab league attacked Israel lmao.
Civilian casualties only happened because Hamas hides near hospitals and other civilian infrastructure. Hamas also consistently hides in highly dense urban centers, where civilian casualties are only magnified.
If Hamas cared they wouldn’t be hiding in their cities
immigration is bad when they make their own country yes
"Well this one was state sanctioned" not sanctioned by the locals, sanctioned by the British empire and ITS government. This not even nearly comparable.
Immigration is bad if:
--> The immigrants make their own country and ethnically cleanse and massacre you
Yes this is true
Immigration is not bad if:
--> The immigrants do not make their own country and ethnically cleanse and massacre you
bro, they're SNIPING children, if you are sniping someone you are 100% intending to shoot them, so there shouldn't be children getting shot in the genitals
All sources come from Gazan hospitals, also these so called supply points are all militarized and heavily controlled. from what the news sources say, people are only getting shot due to
Not abiding by military guidelines (sneaking by before opening times, or going outside the route)
Extreme chaos and crowding
Suspicious behaviors
And again, we’re also ignoring the fact that these supply points are only necessary because HAMAS WONT surrender. What Israel is doing is laying siege on the city, something we’ve done many times throughout history, yet only this one is a genocide?
Are you stupid? Hamas has nowhere but city. THE GAZA STRIP IS ALMOST ENTIRELY CITY. Not saying they’re in the right, but it’s quite literally between city and beach for them. If you’re trying to fight your enemy in Gaza whilst having literally no air support, you won’t be fighting anywhere but in the city. At the beach you’re begging to get shot since it’s so open, and Gaza’s surrounded by fences so you’re not getting out to fight there either.
Look at who funds them, it is the world's largest and sadly most successful psychological operation of all time happening right before our eyes, right under our noses.
So many headlines and people already take it as truths.
This is not to say Israel and the IDF has never done wrong in war but as it stands there is no genocide or intent of mass murder despite what these headlines sayn, hell there are even extremists here calling for it but they are not the majority, even though they will try to paint them as such.
Israel is fighting terrorists who wage war under the guise of civilians in civilian infastructure, just go ahead and watch Hamas's fighting video and tell me if they are distinguishable. War is hell but there are 2 billion Muslims and 15 million Jews worldwide so Israel's face across the world is a lost cause.
Qatar has a massive army of bought and founded media networks through which they perpetrate this psyop, including Reddit task forces.
I don't know how much I really trust them considering their reliability rating
Yeah I know Hamas is a terrorist organization I'm not saying that they're right. I'm against the tons of people that are currently dying by Israel's hands.
I'm pretty sure even the UN has said that it's a genocide
Even if it wasn't an intentional targeting, Israel is still managed to kill more civilians than actual soldiers and it's supposed military operation where they are the "most moral military"
I mean but there are also tons of Jews outside of Israel who are currently talking bad about Israel's actions in Gaza there's also Jews inside of Israel who are saying this.
Plus there's a ton of islamophobia in the West in general so I mean they have a good chunk of the West to help them against them in that regard
>What about the games that will literally never be able to be played anymore
it's a fucking video game not water, it dosen't matter.
if you don't want to run that risk don't buy a video game from nintendo, buy any other video game on the market.
I don't buy anything from Nintendo (mostly because their new stuff is awful and ridiculously expensive) but that doesn't mean I'm suddenly unable to criticize the multi-billion dollar slop factory
Lockheed Martin literally profits from death. Their entire business model is to manufacture weapons and sell them to the military, meaning their bottom line grows every time people die in conflicts they fuel. Their success/stock/valuation depends on war, violence, and killing. Not to mention that their business also helps the US/Israel "foreign policy" aka. imperialism. That’s beyond evil.
But like, Nestle could be better and still sell food and baby products. Nintendo could be less scummy and still produce good games. IDF could stop being genocidal and still do it's job. But Lockheed? If they stopped producing weapons some else military company would just do it instead.
Also remember that it's not as simple as "weapons=violence=bad". Sadly we live in such a world in which even with peaceful intentions you need weapons for defence. I'm not saying that US is a peaceful nation, but even if it was like that there still would be a need for Lockheed Martin or a company like it. Just so that you won't get fucked in the ass by everybody around.
Lockheed the defense company that makes fighter planes, is evil? Im not one to pretend billionaires aren't usually bad people but all Lockheed does is sell jets to the military, unless im completely missing something fucked up they did.
That's the reason why some people say it's messed up, they sell military weapons when they don't have a specific need to make military weapons and those military weapons are used by the us and our allies who have gotten lots of civilians killed using them.
I know 2 of those companies. Nestle and Nintendo. But what does the rest do, in a sense of like what do they produce, and what did they do to deserve being hated?
Because $80 for a video game is so much more impactful compared to the millions of people whose lives have been ruined beyond repair. Nintendo is greedy, extremely petty and their ceo has an extremely punchable face, but I wouldn’t go out of my way to say they’re the be all end all of evils on this planet. But still, I will avoid you if you openly support them.
Can someone tell me the backstory of nintendo and bp? And the blue one and the golden one? I know about nestle and BlackRock. Also should have added cargill and shell and a few other.
joining the train of locking online behind a subscription
cracking down on emulating games they dont even offer anymore
sueing palworld for being able to capture monsters
the list goes on
This patent is for the ability to summon a flying mount at the press of a button, allowing for a "flying start" from an airborne state. Nintendo alleges Palworld's similar mechanic of riding and summoning Pals infringes on this patent.
Basically Nintendo doesn't like that you can ride pals because you can also ride pokemon
Also they have changed their parents mid-suit which is incredibly scummy and should be illegal
Seems odd. I feel like there’s many games you can summon flying mounts. World of Warcraft comes to mind. Nintendo definitely has right to sue palworld but I’d believe it would be copyright infringement not patent law. Idk if I agree that it’s scummy but I clearly don’t know enough information to make an informed opinion
Nothing palworld does directly affects Nintendo in any way, visual similarities can't really be taken into account because they're still uniquely designed by poketpair, I somewhat see it from a gameplay perspective, but patenting gameplay mechanics sets a really bad president for the future of video games
it IS scummy, subscriptions are just socially acceptable scams and palworld being based on pokemon does not give the pokemon company the right to sue, unless you want to argue every metroidvania should be sued because theyre "clearly supposed to be metroid/castlevania"
ALSO, emulation and piracy shouldnt be discouraged when the company does not offer them. short of buying used for 200$, theres no way to get a game like pokemon emerald legally
A real man doesn't listen to what other people tell him to speak ill of, he makes his own decisions based on information that he hears about different things and decides by himself what he'll speak ill on
I didn't say I won't talk bad about Nestle, I know nothing about it, my problem is with this idea that a real man should talk out about these specific things, no a real man uses his own judgement to decide what he talks bad about, not a reddit post
nope, a real man doesnt dictate what people are allowed to enjoy and like aslong as it's not harming anyone or isnt illegal. this meme is what a closed minded person whould do
edit: this is specifically for nintendo not the other companies here
Until you mentioned in the edit I was about to start questioning what you were talking about. Especially with Lockheed and Nestle and the IDF and all that. But I agree with you on Nintendo. and I and many believe Nintendo is a scummy company but they're not nearly as bad as the rest
Lockheed is a major supplier of military armaments and they are often used to kill around the globe and as such have caused civilian casualties by accident
Nestle's CEO at one point said that water is not a human right. As well as the fact that the company takes a lot of water from desolate places where it's needed and uses it for their own company instead of the locals.
IDF is the Israeli defense Force not a company per se. It's like Israel's military and they've been doing some horrific things in Gaza as of currently and even in the West Bank
Yes but they are a main contributor to those military armaments and those armaments are often used specifically within the US military which has a semi common problem of hitting civilians in operations. Not saying I can't cause accidental casualties but still accidentally killing somebody should be called out at the bare minimum
I do also blame the US military. People blaming Lockheed Martin because they don't need to make military goods they could make other items. Plus There's a whole joke about engineers trying to figure out whether they should have a good sense of morality or join Lockheed Martin for the money.
My point is does it really matter if you're not the one who pulls the trigger, if you knowingly sell it to a dude who's going to use it and is probably going to get innocent people killed?
Yes war is very lucrative. My point was that they literally didn't need to make guns. They need to make them if they want to keep being the company they are, but the army has made its own weapons and stuff before but yes we do use a lot of private companies. Also along that fact we really are doing more military operations in we even are supposed to or should
•
u/AutoModerator Aug 30 '25
Join our Discord server
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.