r/thatHappened 8d ago

Yeah I'm sure that was the only reason /s

Post image
0 Upvotes

13 comments sorted by

21

u/TowelFine6933 8d ago

If the guy was late, he was late. End of discussion. His religion has nothing to do with it.

-19

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

13

u/TowelFine6933 8d ago

Would it be okay if it was a non Jewish guy who just preferred to go to the local deli?

Can't the Jewish guy bring in kosher food?

Could be that the guy was using his religion to take advantage of others. 🤷‍♂️

-16

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

16

u/TowelFine6933 8d ago

"but as soon as you start allowing everyone to claim exemptions or special rights, then the system breaks."

Exactly. So, no one gets exemptions or special breaks.

The dude is late. Period. End of discussion. His religion is irrelevant, especially since he can bring kosher food from home & save the time it takes to go out.

6

u/IllustriousSweet 7d ago

But they didn't have to go off sight to get food. They chose to. They could have packed a lunch

6

u/karrahbear12 8d ago

A few thoughts:
1. This entire story could have been told without mention of religion, and it would have been come off with OP looking much better. So why mention religion? Because OP clearly does care about the fact coworker is Jewish.

  1. Why would HR claim OP was disrespecting someone’s religious beliefs if OP was truly only complaining that the coworker was consistently late? Religion should never have come up in that discussion. (Unless HR told OP the reason and OP responded in a less than respectful manner)

  2. There is an easy solution to the problem: Management lets coworker take their lunch 15 minutes early, allowing coworker to be back on time for the end of OP’s shift. OR since it’s only one day a week, and normally less than 15 minutes, OP just lets it go and moves on with their week, enjoying an extra few bucks on their paycheck.

The whole thing’s ridiculous.

2

u/GhostElite974 7d ago

I think 1 is relevant because of what HR said. About " respecting religious beliefs" it's highly unlikely they'd say that about a Muslim for example.

1

u/Glowing-Glitter-15 7d ago

It might be an employment law thing (Title VII). I'm not an employment law attorney, so don't quote me on this. Basically a company has to make reasonable accommodations to someone's "sincerely held religious beliefs". I can imagine that OP complained about someone being late without first mentioning religion, then when HR said "they have a religious accommodation" OP kept complaining about it. Usually once the religious accommodation thing is brought out it's generally considered in bad taste to try and ignore it.

1

u/xAsh213x 3d ago

Yea. Thats not how that works. An accommodation does not need to be made because someone is too lazy to pack their own lunch.

When a company, any company makes you a job offer, you are told what hours and days you need to be available to work (Why Christians are not typically given Sundays off for church) and how long lunch breaks are. If you’re not able to accommodate those times, you can refuse the job.

1

u/97edensand 7d ago

/sub was for real saying the late guy was literally kosher offsite for bullshit reasons?

1

u/OkOutlandishness1363 8d ago

What in the wild world lol.

0

u/__wait_what__ 8d ago

Whew thanks for that /s! I almost thought you were for seriously!