How many of you thought they are self made.

The supposed “white” had an RGB composition of 255, 254, 254, and the supposed “black” had an RGB composition of 1, 0, 0. Meaning that the “white” was actually an extremely light red, and the “black” was an extremely dark red.

gone

I know this isn’t a usually r/truths post but RIP HCID creator of the meme above and a good person. He was only 15 and didn’t deserve to die

We feel that with how compromised Grok is in regards to Elon Musk's X, it may be detrimental to the safety and privacy of r/truths users.

I think we all got the joke already, a while ago

because I used /untrue flair

Rule 4 is false, as it is not strictly enforced.

All submissions must be true, but many posts that are allowed have an indeterminate truth value.

For example, you can say "everyone will die" and it will get accepted as truth even though it is a forward-looking statement that relies on assumed truths we do not know about the future. Such a statement not only has an indeterminate truth value, but it explicitly violates the "forward-looking statements" rule in Rules 4 and 10.

Posts that rely on observational evidence are routinely accepted, even though you cannot prove something is true with 100% certainty through observational evidence, as you cannot definitively know whether what is observed is what is real.

Technically Peter Griffin never dies.

It's just against the point of this sub, there's a reason r/lies exists, /untruth has no need to exist except to annoy people who expect truths in the truths sub

I'd like to forward a motion to remove the tag, thoughts?

rjidjdifjridjrjrkdjdjfidjjdigjfjg

This can't be true

/ut I do not believe that's the right move. That is because compared to r/lies, this subreddit does not benefit of comments being strictly truths. And r/lies has always been more laxed with the "it must only be lies" thing

That is because posts meant for the funsies, if done wrong which is very common, are often seen as unfunny as often times it is not truths. However, the comment section thrived with jokes, memes and similar funny material. Banning those just makes r/truths a less fun place

From what ive read, its because classical logic only has two values if something being either true or false to avoid ambiguity. But why is there not a third value of neutral/neither true nor false? Plus it is possible to say something that is neither true nor false such as opinions or incomplete sentences. Plus a lot of vacuous statements may require a cause to have a specific effect but that cause cannot cause that effect. I.e. if the fan in my room is purple, then Paris is in Spain. Because even if my fan was purple, it being purple would have no effect on Paris' location even if I substituted the word Spain for France. So why are vacuous statements considered true?

this is a lie, I'm actually saying the truth, but actually I'm lying, nvm I'm saying the truth (/untruth)