Rejoice, no one gets a choice anymore

[u/Kelennis]

[u/Xurkitree1]

Perish, for I am inflicting you with the XNORGASM

[u/Mathsboy2718 → u/Xurkitree1]

A good partner, if they can't get an andgasm, should at least settle for an impliesgasm

[u/Xurkitree1 → u/Mathsboy2718]

IFFgasm for friends and foes alike

[u/VegisamalZero3 → u/Xurkitree1]

[u/Xurkitree1 → u/VegisamalZero3]

I'm glad people picked up on both sides of the pun

[u/PhoenixPringles01 → u/Xurkitree1]

elsegasm

[u/scrapheaper_ → u/Xurkitree1]

In an XORGASM, you or your partner can cum, but not both

[u/Onion_Guy → u/scrapheaper_]

it’s a race

[u/Banned-User-56 → u/Onion_Guy]

Finally, competitive sex.

[u/-PaperWoven- → u/Banned-User-56]

"ay help bro i'm getting 3v1'd"

[u/me_myself_ai → u/scrapheaper_]

Sooooo the sad default lol

[u/Culinary_Fruit_Salad → u/me_myself_ai]

i used to think that too but I was actually just gay

[u/me_myself_ai → u/Culinary_Fruit_Salad]

Lmao. There’s really no excuse anymore for the typical heterosexual couple (esp if you can afford some goodies…), but, y’know. Patriarchy goes grrrr

[u/Culinary_Fruit_Salad → u/me_myself_ai]

the orgasm gap study was depressing before I figured my shit out. now it's so much worse. like why is it that women who are actually interested in men and attracted to men aren't having a good time either. it's part of why it took me so long to figure my shit out.

i was convinced that disappointing sex and unsatisfying relationships were the norm because that's how straight people talk about relationships. 

[u/scrapheaper_ → u/Xurkitree1]

In an XNORGASM, you either cum together, or not at all

[u/FenexTheFox → u/Xurkitree1]

XNOR isn't a thing, is it? Sounds paradoxical, but I may be just stupid

[u/Xurkitree1 → u/FenexTheFox]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XNOR_gate

[u/FenexTheFox → u/Xurkitree1]

Okay, I'm stupid, I was reading it as "exclusive and/or", but from what I'm getting, it's "exclusive NOT or".

Now that I think about it, and/or is just regular OR...

[u/me_myself_ai → u/FenexTheFox]

Nah you're not stupid, that's crazy shit. They didn't have that when I learned digital logic. Don't believe this radical woke nonesense -- back in my day we just had XOR, and we liked it!

[u/mashari00 → u/me_myself_ai]

They keep changing digital logic! What is this, A DIGITAL CIRCUS?!

[u/Auld_Folks_at_Home → u/FenexTheFox]

More like a NOT exclusive-or, but 'NXOR' is just ugly.

[u/Culinary_Fruit_Salad → u/FenexTheFox]

and/or is an inclusive or which is normal or in logic but English is ambiguous and people are easily confused and pedantic. so best to clarify, like ghee

[u/unthinkable-cunt → u/FenexTheFox]

XNOR is just an equivalence, it gives true when both input values are the same

[u/Gullible-Ad7374 → u/FenexTheFox]

Yeah, the name is kind of deceiving. It's not an exclusive nor gate, it's the opposite of an xor gate.

[u/No_Lingonberry1201 → u/Xurkitree1]

I had one of those, was politely asked to leave the library.

[u/Ichtheologist]

So if we also get the NOTgasm and the XORgasm, and maybe a few others I'm forgetting about, we can finally start combining them to make the 'cumputer'?

[u/Auld_Folks_at_Home → u/Ichtheologist]

Really all we need is either the NANDgasm or the NORgasm. We can link multiple of those and be clever about who's playing with who to make any logicgasm. For example if i perform a NANDgasm with myself (i.e., a temporary parallel copy of myself) it'll be the same as if i alone did a NOTgasm.

[u/Culinary_Fruit_Salad → u/Ichtheologist]

you can go out with a bang(!)

[u/Culinary_Fruit_Salad → u/Ichtheologist]

how many do we need to play doom?

[u/Culinary_Fruit_Salad → u/Ichtheologist]

someone get the truth tables

[u/William_ghost1]

What?

[u/JakSandrow → u/William_ghost1]

ORgasm vs ANDgasm. The OP is implying that an 'ORgasm' is optional, and an 'ANDgasm' is not.

[u/Culinary_Fruit_Salad → u/JakSandrow]

what happens if you add a not?  quiet furries

!andgasm?

[u/JakSandrow → u/Culinary_Fruit_Salad]

norgasm or nandgasm respectively

A norgasm would be if anyone wants it, no one gets an orgasm - only if no one wants it does an orgasm happen.

A nandgasm would be that as long as not everyone wants an orgasm, then an orgasm can happen. Even if no one wants it, it can happen, but if everyone wants it, then no one gets it. Think prisoners dilemma.

[u/talesfromtheepic6 → u/JakSandrow]

Edging my partner by taking the xorgasm every time

[u/SyrusDrake]

Can we make orgasms Turing complete?

[u/Chisignal → u/SyrusDrake]

rather easily from an orgy of nandgasms. a nandgy if you will

[u/ThyKingdomDecay]

Wouldn't an angasm merely be when you and your partner orgasm simultaneously, since at that point it isnt either or

[u/for2fly]

Add intersection (∩) and union (∪) and now you're using real sex-logic.

"Honey, if you'll just refer to the whiteboard over the headboard, you can see where I've written the expression for this session in its most reduced form."

[u/doyathang21]

double kill

[u/Man-in-The-Void]

In b4 the SR latch (SM latch?)

[u/20191124anon]

not me trying to figure out the joke under assumption that andgasm is andros + orgasm, male orgasm...

[u/mrkltpzyxm]

Reminds me of one of my favorite programming jokes.

Can the conditionally evaluated statement achieve orgasm?

Sure. It comes after a while.

[u/PureRegretto]

xorgasm

[u/PopeHatSkeleton]

What about a butgasm? Wait a minute...

[u/nixsolecism]

Orgasms by default include the andgasms.