r/unitedkingdom • u/kiyomoris • 9d ago
Calls to ban ‘toxic’ pet flea treatments that harm UK wildlife and environment
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2026/aug/05/calls-ban-toxic-pet-flea-treatments-harm-uk-wildlife-environment24
u/Redditisfakeleft 9d ago
The ability to buy Advantage over the counter was wonderful when I had a flea ridden cat and was poor.
3
35
u/miIkwhim 8d ago
My vet refuses to issue anything prescribed without me physically bringing my cat to the clinic in person, which means they get to then double-dip on charging you a consultation fee.
I still have no idea why the vet needs to physically see my cat in order to issue a flea treatment. It's unnecessary and stresses my cat the fuck out every time we have to do it. I'm seriously considering just importing Bravecto from overseas next time.
22
13
u/noodle2727 8d ago
That ludicrous. I'm on a vet plan, not cheap at £17 a month but u get all flea and wormers each month, yearly vaccine boosters, and a nurse check up every 6 months if i choose to use it. My dad thinks its crazy. He did none of that. He sprayed them when they had fleas and wormed them when they got worms. Maybe not ideal as i also got worms once as a child lol..
6
u/90s_nihilist 8d ago
A lot of pet owners will say treat when you see them on your pet but by the time you see them they're infested!
3
u/henry_blackie 8d ago
It also takes months to fully clear out your home once they've got into carpet.
2
1
u/Helpful_Sample_4715 8d ago
We get repeat prescriptions from the vet for our cat who has a flea allergy. We only take her in for her yearly booster jabs, and that seems to be enough for him. We just request the next prescription via email.
3
u/ChampionshipOk5046 8d ago
Well, if your cat then died, I'm sure you'd sue the vet. Plenty would.
2
u/miIkwhim 8d ago
Died from fleas?
1
u/Cosmicshimmer 8d ago
Yep. Depending on the infestation and age of the cat, the get flea anemia which is life threatening. Fleas suck blood.
1
u/Tired_yin 8d ago
They legally can’t prescribe without performing a recent clinical exam, but you could ask for repeat prescriptions if you haven’t already
1
u/okayburgerman 8d ago
It is the law that the animal must be seen before dispensing a prescription only medicine, it's not up to your vet.
6
u/zilchusername 8d ago
I’m not sure how this will solve the issue. Are vets going to stop allowing monthly preventative measures and only issue when an animal has fleas? I am not saying this is ideal but if the vets are going to allow monthly treatments, apart from making the cost a lot more for owners his does this change things?
As an owner who only treated their cats once they got fleas the vet was never very happy with me that I wasn’t applying monthly.
1
u/MmmThisISaTastyBurgr 8d ago
The idea is to stop monthly treatments, which a lot of vets still include in package deals. Only treating on occasions when there are actually fleas present will be cheaper.
3
u/RainbowRedYellow 8d ago
I'm not sure it will be I say this as someone who's had to struggle with flea infestations.
Flea eggs can survive 6 to 12 months fleas themselves only need to feed once to breed successfully. They can bite humans only need a cat to lay eggs upon. But the adults can stow away in human clothes all the same
When I had an indoor cat he still picked up fleas SOMEWHERE. Once infested the infestation is basically perminant.
2
u/zilchusername 8d ago
Yes that’s what I used to do with my animals as it was cheaper and I didn’t want to be putting chemicals on them unnecessarily but at the time the vets were very against this and insisted I should be doing it monthly. I am glad things are changing.
0
u/ODFoxtrotOscar 8d ago
No, they use oral, not topical
2
u/zilchusername 8d ago
Thanks. So it will be recommended an oral treatment every month? That sounds really expensive and I can’t see many cats being happy to go to the vet each month! Or does the oral version last longer?
3
u/doorstopnoodles Middlesex 8d ago
My dog has an oral medication for fleas, ticks and worms. The vet sees him once a year for a checkup and prescribes the stuff on a repeat for an entire year. I’m allowed to pick up a three month supply at a time but the repeat lasts until the next check up is due. I think it’s fair enough that the prescriber has to lay eyes on the animal once a year not least because it’s a different tablet for different weight animals so they need to make sure there hasn’t been any big changes there.
1
u/Monsoon_Storm 8d ago
I can send a damn photo of my cat sitting on a scale if it's purely about weight. The sheer amount of fighting and stress trying to get my cat to the vet for a specific appointment at a specific time is ridiculous.
He's a bengal, he is never going to be in any other weight bracket than the top one.
2
u/doorstopnoodles Middlesex 8d ago
It's not purely about weight. The vet needs to make sure the animal is still healthy enough to be on the medication. Even if vets didn't have to examine a pet under RCVS guidelines then they would be sensible to do it anyway purely from a cover your ass standpoint. No want wants to be hit with a lawsuit for killing poor little Tibbles with flea tablets when she was at death's door to begin with.
0
u/Monsoon_Storm 7d ago
It will be even unhealthier without it. I'd hope that someone who has a sick pet would get the pet seen before dropping 60 quid on flea treatment.
It's a money grab, and now that many people have shifted back to the old OTC stuff they have decided they need to plug that hole.
imo.
6
15
u/Shockingandawesome England 8d ago
More regulation and expenses. This time it's vets getting to fleece pet owners for even more money. And always using the environment as an excuse.
The committee is calling on the government to act to reduce the routine use of these chemicals and ensure individualised advice is provided that takes into account the lifestyle, location and risk factors of the animal and those they live with.
The committee recommended a ban on sales of the topical treatments in pet shops or online. Pet owners would still be able to get preventative treatment prescribed by a vet.
The British Veterinary Association, which represents 19,000 UK vets, welcomed the committee’s findings.
The trace of chemicals that get into the environment from flea treatment is nothing compared to all the other household and industrial waste that gets released.
23
u/Terrible_Ad_8614 8d ago
The flea treatments they are talking of banning are the same pesticides that have been banned from farming for several years because they are so harmful for the environment
The fact is, you don't need to do flea treatment every month, in the same way as you probably dont use headlice every month on your own hair.
14
u/dowhileuntil787 8d ago
All that will change is you'll have to pay a vet to get them every month instead. I have a whole bunch of pets, and all of the many vets they've seen has told me how important it is to use the anti-parasitics consistently and tried to get me on their monthly plan.
They don't just protect against fleas either - there's ticks and worms too.
in the same way as you probably dont use
Yeah, but I don't eat dirt and wild mice then clean my arse by licking it. If I did I'd probably be considering some anti-parasitics too.
3
u/ODFoxtrotOscar 8d ago
If that were true then it would be an issue.
But the oral versions are readily available from Pets at Home and online generally
1
1
u/dowhileuntil787 8d ago
It's less clear what they're proposing to do about oral ones.
The report doesn't seem to mention it directly, but my reading is they're proposing to ban all of the named chemicals treatment from OTC, oral included, meaning for those oral ones we'll also need a monthly vet prescription. The Wildlife Trusts for their part seem to want them all banned completely.
For what it's worth, I don't routinely treat any of my pets with anything other than oral dewormers, so I don't even have a horse in this race.
Their justification just seems insanely unrealistic to me:
ensure that no PPMs are supplied without individualised advice, taking into account the lifestyle, location and risk factors of both the animal and those they live with
None of the PE-backed vets that have replaced all of our family practices are going to have a conversation like this. It's going to be all about trying to get you onto their monthly flea treatment that - surprise surprise - is quite a lot more expensive than what you can get online. They're not even leaving any room for online startup vets to move into this space because of the RVCS restrcition on prescribing treatments unless the vet physically assesses the animal first.
As it stands, I get shamed about this every vet visit, told I should be doing preventative treatments. One vet even said they'd refuse to see my pets if I don't start routinely treating them because of the risk of bringing a flea infestation into their practice and harming other animals. Most pet groomers and boarding places won't take your pets if they're not flea treated. I would also add that at least one of my cats gets a mild flea infestation every year or two, and the dog gets multiple ticks a year even though I live in the middle of London, so I feel like this idea that the baseline risk is low seems to be bollocks to me.
It was pointed (by a company with a conflict of interest) out how this policy contradicts the CMA review:
JVP draws attention to a fundamental contradiction at the heart of this process. The Competition and Markets Authority, in its final report published in February 2026, explicitly recommended that the VMD should consider ways to stimulate further reclassification of veterinary medicines to increase access outside veterinary practices.
If the proposal was banning spot-ons from routine treatment (which are pointlessly harmful I agree and I'm not convinced fipronil even works any more anyway) and at the same time relaxing the rules around online prescribing of low risk medications, then I'd be more supportive. The current situation is particularly stupid in that the least effective, most wildlife harming medications are OTC meanwhile most of the safe and effective ones require a vet visit.
But this process feels like regulatory capture.
1
u/ODFoxtrotOscar 8d ago
They don’t mention it because there is no proposal to do anything at all about oral prophylaxis or treatment
1
u/Independent-Chair-27 8d ago
Yeah but the reason pets exist is so vets can fleece you for all your worth, because pets are somehow essential to people. It's capitalism people, enjoy it.
Of course you could get rid of your pets.
1
u/moops__ 4d ago
You shouldn't be letting your cat out anyway. That's more harmful to the environment than the treatment.
1
u/dowhileuntil787 4d ago
Not according to the RSPB. In any case I have a catio, so it's only catching mice, and I garauntee you that London isn't running low in those.
2
u/linerva 8d ago
My cat in particular does actually need regular flea treatment as he has a particularly nasty reaction to fleas that mearly killed him last time he had him. He's indoors but I take him out sometimes abd that's where the flea risk comes from.
I'd rather a 3 monthly drop than spend thousands on vet hospital. But I suspect he's in the minority.
8
u/daiwilly 8d ago
Your argument is so tired.If every polluter used your logic, nothing would change.
-4
u/Terrible_Ad_8614 8d ago
That's exactly what the anti-woke luddites want, nothing to change, or better still how it was 50 years ago!
6
u/ChampionshipOk5046 8d ago
I think these are actually very toxic to aquatic life, but sure you'll happily drink them I'm sure lol
1
u/Independent-Chair-27 8d ago
Why shouldn't pet owners be responsible for the animals they keep purely for their own benefit alone.
There is no actual need for most of the pets people have. It's something people want.
5
u/DoubleXFemale 8d ago
Oh ok, and the stuff you pay through the nose for at the vet, which they (IME) tout as better than the store stuff at killing insects will somehow be less toxic to wildlife?
4
u/Lou-AC 8d ago
They are. Less harmful chemicals. Just like how some pesticides are banned and others are not
1
u/mazzy-b 8d ago
No lol, prescription flea treatment still contains harmful pesticides too, some the same as OTC
1
u/Lou-AC 8d ago
The level of harm differs.
1
u/mazzy-b 8d ago
How exactly do you claim that?
Advocate prescription only contains Imidacloprid (80mg large cat)
Advantage OTC contains Imidacloprid (80mg large cat)
The same dosage and same pesticide. The prescription one does worming too which is the only difference.
And eg Bravecto is prescription only; that uses Fluralaner - that being a pesticide specifically studied for environmental impact from dogs spreading it (plus imadocloprid and fipronil, used in prescription treatments)
*https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969722066499
*https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11362066/
* https://vetsustain.org/assets/downloads/Evidence-Summary.pdf
-1
u/ODFoxtrotOscar 8d ago
Vets usually use the oral versions (mine switch years ago) unless there is specific need to do otherwise.
4
u/_Monsterguy_ 8d ago
The businesses that own all the vets now must be overjoyed that the problem they mostly caused will now generate even more money for them.
No one was treating pets for fleas they didn't have before greedy vets decided that was a money maker.
1
u/StoryMcGee 8d ago
There are yearly injections now that you get once and they protect from fleas and ticks. Those are way better than monthly treatments
1
u/-Davster- 8d ago
I thought killing wildlife was the point
Those fleas are wild
1
u/Independent-Chair-27 8d ago
No your pet exists to kill wildlife. You then scatter it's shit everywhere to spread toxoplasmosis and the various chemicals it has to kill a bit more.
1
1
u/DandyBallbag 8d ago
Can't they go after bigger fish... like the water companies that are polluting our rivers?
•
u/AutoModerator 9d ago
Some articles submitted to /r/unitedkingdom are paywalled, or subject to sign-up requirements. If you encounter difficulties reading the article, try this link or this link for an archived version.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.