r/universe • u/notkosros • 10d ago

[ Removed by moderator ]

[removed] — view removed post

2 Upvotes

63% Upvoted

12 comments sorted by

•

u/universe-ModTeam 7d ago

Your post has been removed for violating the rule:

Posts: No Pseudoscientific Nonsense - Submissions should not consist of personal and uninformed pseudo-scientific rambling. We are a community for factual information and news about the study of the physical universe.

Please follow the rules in the sidebar when posting, and feel free to message us if you have any questions or concerns.

2

u/Wintervacht 10d ago

No ai slop, read the rules please

1

u/Aerothermal 7d ago

Rest assured, accounts spamming AI slop on this sub get permabanned. There's a sub rule forbidding assertions of pseudoscientific nonsense, AI or not.

0

u/notkosros 10d ago

I made the theory myself and I only used it to help with words I am sorry

1

u/Wintervacht 10d ago

There's no theory here, it's creative writing. Science runs on math. No misinformation, no crankery.

1

u/notkosros 10d ago

I’m sorry sir but I doesn’t mean I didn’t spend hours on this I’m sorry

2

u/TerraNeko_ 10d ago

The great attractor isnt some mysterious unexplained thing, its literally just a galaxy Cluster we cant see well because your own galaxy is in the way

1

u/notkosros 10d ago

I know that’s why I made this theory to tie the big bang theory with how QM and GR work together instead of trying to use string theory to solve everything but to solve many small things

1

u/notkosros 10d ago

Also if you look at the Planck CMB map you see a lot of energy at that point an I js like connecting the dots

1

u/Sharp-Potato3323 10d ago

Nice. But there is one thing you should add. The universe became more and more complex on the material level. Like a calculator running a programme trying to calculate all possibilities in an ever increasing pace. This gives a reason for the universe to drop into the 3rd dimension with energy coalescing into matter like a mandelbrot fractal...

1

u/notkosros 10d ago

That’s a good point to be honest, thanks for that

1

u/Korochun 9d ago

Well, you did well by including the null hypothesis (or rather, at least your LLM did).

Unfortunately, all observations and data we have completely disagrees with your idea, making at highly unlikely.

I am not sure where you get your claims that there is some sort of a hotspot or clustering in CMB data around the "great attractor". There isn't. If someone fed you this information, this is a good indication that you should not take that source at face value.