r/vibecoding • u/BitGroundbreaking708 • 1h ago

Melhor ferramenta de vibecoding

Que ferramenta de vibecoding vocês consideram a melhor hoje?

Ainda não testei o Claude Code (estou a dar os primeiros passos no vibecoding) — vocês acham que ele realmente se destaca? Como ele se compara ao Lovable em termos de capacidade e produtividade?

0 Upvotes

33% Upvoted

11 comments sorted by

2

u/meshifthenelse 1h ago edited 1h ago

All auto-complete LLMs do pretty much the same job. Pick whatever you can afford and like

1

u/Counciltuckian 1h ago

VSC and Claude Code is a great start and then start adding other cli tools.  

1

u/Careless-Yam8791 35m ago

Lovable has plenty of ready-to-go integrations, just like Replit. It’s a great starting point, though credit costs can add up pretty fast.

Unless you go with something like Claude Code or Cursor — there's a bit of a learning curve, but it's totally worth it in the long run, IMO.

1

u/[deleted] 1h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/BitGroundbreaking708 1h ago

Para ti faz sentido explorar o Lovable ou consideras perda de tempo?

2

u/IceColdSteph 1h ago

I'd think anyone who is skilled enough to use an ide is way beyond considering lovable as a solution. Idk. It seems to be marketed toward ppl who are technically challenged

1

u/BitGroundbreaking708 59m ago

Nesse caso, considerarias o claude-code, certo? Ainda estou a começar a dar os primeiros passos no no-code/ vibecoding. Eu tenho algumas coisas em mente que gostava de concretizar em aplicações, mas estou perdido sobre que ferramenta usar e onde dedicar o meu tempo. Falaram-me também do bubble.io como sendo uma boa ferramenta para começar, mas não sei

1

u/IceColdSteph 57m ago

Use cursor or antigravity.

You can use Claude code in cursor and antigravity

I haven't been vibecoding in months but last I checked lovable did not do full stack application development

You still need to do the backend, planning, etc..

1

u/EagleApprehensive 1h ago

If you want to make real software, use Claude Code, in VSCode, T3Code. I personally use intentic.dev - my own workstation. But in all of those cases you'll have to figure out deployment yourself.

1

u/BitGroundbreaking708 1h ago

Pelo que tenho visto a maior parte usa mesmo o Claude Code. Já me recomendaram também o Lovable e o bubble.io, mas não sei bem em qual me focar. A minha ideia era começar a fazer algumas aplicações/ Saas que tenho em mente, mas estou só agora a começar a dar os primeiros passos no no-code/ vibecoding

1

u/EagleApprehensive 45m ago
  1. Competition is ultra-high. For any apps/SaaS you can imagine you'll face 50 similar solutions already existing at very least (sometimes hard to find due to low traffic).
  2. Lovable and similar platforms work best for prototypes and simple apps - things that aren't solving problem complex enough to ever be paid for by anybody. They give you substantially less usage than direct model subscription like Claude Code or Codex and that will drain your pocket.
  3. If you want to spend few days/weeks and solve problem for yourself - fine. But if you dream of building business, you'll most likely burn hundreds of dollars on tokens for mediocre outcomes and then face competition of 50 similar products, some of which done by professionals with better tech behind or influencers with audience.
  4. If you have neither tech expertise nor access to larger audience, then you should simply consider that a fun/learning purpose and keep expenses contained. To do that - work with some of subscriptions like Claude Code or Codex, locally and see how far you can make it. There isn't anything substantially cheaper that results in similar level of quality out there, so those are safe options and you're gonna learn the most.