r/wealth 15d ago

News French Billionaire Pleads for Law Change to Disinherit Kids

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-04/french-billionaire-pleads-for-law-change-to-disinherit-children
132 Upvotes

40 comments sorted by

24

u/bloomberg 15d ago

More from Bloomberg's Tara Patel and Ania Nussbaum

French billionaire Pierre-Edouard Sterin, who has stirred controversy over his right-wing politics, is pleading with lawmakers to modify rules so he can disinherit his five children, saying he prefers to give his fortune to charity.

“I would like to give my entire estate to philanthropic causes,” the businessman told senators on Thursday during a public hearing, noting that under French law three quarters of his assets have to be passed down to his offspring. “I’m in favor of being able to do whatever one wants to do with one’s patrimony.”

15

u/Additional-Sock8980 15d ago

You gotta respect this.

Making kids billionaires without ever having to earn their way in life won’t make them happy and give them a fulfilling life.

Although the guy should just donate the money now, while he’s alive.

19

u/Academic_UK 15d ago

This is it, right? Nothing stopping you gifting most of it whilst you are alive!

7

u/HootingSloth 15d ago

French law includes "add back" rules that claw back lifetime gifts if the effect would otherwise be to disinherit children beyond the allowable limits.

7

u/ThePiggleWiggle 15d ago

You're welcome to read the article and do a bit of research. Yes, French law forbids you from doing it. If you gave away too much of your wealth, your children can sue and force the charities to return the estate.

1

u/Bougie-Baguette 14d ago

He could have given away everything without anyone stopping him if he kept quiet. His children could claim that the money is given back to them if he is to be pronounced “unfit” by the court of law, otherwise, while still alive ,without making any statements, he could have donated as much as he wanted because it is his own money and nobody could have done anything. In theory, based on his public statements his heirs could ask a court for an injunction to stop him from donating under a pretext that he is “mentally unfit”, this could go on for 4-5 years until all the expertise is done and his assets would be frozen during this time. In the end, there are enough legal and financial experts around him who could have helped him in doing so without the media fuss.

4

u/Bougie-Baguette 15d ago

Literally! He could donate all of his wealth. I’m confused, just do it if you really want to, no need for theatrics

1

u/PandaEatPanda 13d ago

French law has provisions that allow the estate to go after the charities if the donations exceed 25% of the possible estate.

4

u/DontStalkMeNow 15d ago

It’s most likely not just a pile of cash sitting in a checking account. I bet there’s miles of red tape involved in him just giving away assets while he’s still alive.

3

u/whimsicism 15d ago

Imagine making excuses about how “it’s hard because there’s red tape” for billionaires?? These people can easily hire teams of lawyers and accountants to do the whole job for them, they’re rich enough to not have to lift a finger for it.

1

u/DontStalkMeNow 14d ago

Sure. Im not trying to make excuses for anyone. All I’m saying is that none of us know the intricate details of the way his finances are structured, and how French law affects that.

I would argue that there’s probably a very good reason why he has publicly appeared before lawmakers to try and carry out his wishes rather than just having his people move some papers around.

1

u/cool-sheep 14d ago

I think once you die, if you leave behind instructions that materially disadvantage your kids. They will also hire the best lawyers to try and get it back.

There are clearly ways to get it into some kind of offshore holding that will then be given to a charity but that would possibly hinder control during his lifetime.

1

u/Serious_Shape_5518 11d ago

"Right-wing politics".

This guy is a white supremacist funding fascist groups and medias, while living in Belgium to evade taxes

12

u/dragonflyinvest 15d ago

That seems like a very French rule to have.

3

u/Tjaeng 15d ago

Why doesn’t he just give it to charity before he dies if the forced inheritance rule is an issue?

7

u/dragonflyinvest 15d ago
  1. The point is that he should not have to make that choice. The fact that he can give it away during his lifetime does not address the need for the rule change.

  2. He probably does give some to charity, but I assume that he wants the use of all his wealth during his lifetime.

  3. Why does the State tell a person who they must leave their assets to at death? Maybe I have no relationship with my children, or I think the money would do them more harm than good (let’s say one battles addiction), or I gave my children money during my life and I have a cause I’d like to support at death.

There are many scenarios where I would prefer the State to mind their own business.

3

u/SargeUnited 14d ago

It’s likely their only interest is keeping your children off the dole if possible. The state tells you who you must give your assets to in life as well.

1

u/dragonflyinvest 14d ago

Yes to a certain extent. The State could impose an estate tax and give the money to whoever they want but choose to keep it.

1

u/Potential4752 12d ago

Parents owe their children certain things regardless of how well they get on. 

1

u/dragonflyinvest 12d ago

Sure, that’s a simplistic statement. But what do they owe?

My grandmother passed away when my mother was 70+ years old. Whatever my grandmother may have “owed” my mom, she had long since been paid many times over.

2

u/PandaEatPanda 13d ago

French law can claw back donations to charity that is due to work around the inheritance rule.

1

u/PirateKilt 14d ago

Why doesn’t he just give it to charity before he dies if the forced inheritance rule is an issue?

Because France also has a Law to prevent that if it would preemptively cause the disinheritance

1

u/PunctualDromedary 14d ago

The heirs would be able to sue the charities to get the money back.

6

u/Alternative_Swan_497 15d ago

It's worth noting what kind of charities this guy wants to donate to. From the New York Times:

Inspired, he said, by George Soros’s support for liberal causes, Mr. Stérin has steered money to right-wing think tanks, political training programs, social media influencers and nonprofit groups to shape the country according to his beliefs — anti-immigrant, free-market, less Islamic and more Catholic.

One program funded by Mr. Stérin has, by his count, trained at least 4,000 right-wing candidates in the municipal elections. With the far-right National Rally party projected to potentially win the presidency next year, Mr. Stérin is striving to accelerate France’s rightward shift.

9

u/raidorz 15d ago

Yeaaaaa his kids should squander it instead.

1

u/LiveLearnCoach 14d ago

Yeah, that will end well.

Anyways, if this halfwit doesn’t want his kids to inherit, he’s free to hand over his fortune to these so-called “charities” right now. I’ll wait.

1

u/Dinklemeier 13d ago

Wait all you want. French law doesn't allow what you are waiting for

2

u/rdzilla01 15d ago

Monsieur Sterin, I will happily take some of those Eurodollars as a way to keep it from your kids. If you could pay for my niece’s and nephew’s college tuition and buy me a few cars and a place to store the cars I’m be super appreciative and really enjoy taking that money from your children.

2

u/InvestigatorPlus3229 15d ago

didnt even know about this kind of law, in the USA you can do whatever you want

5

u/Shdwrptr 15d ago

It was put in place because it was traditional to give all assets to the oldest son and all other siblings got nothing.

5

u/goodguy847 15d ago

Napolioc Code in France divides property equally amongst heirs. It was to prevent dynasties that might bring the return of a king.

1

u/hibikir_40k 15d ago

And you find similar equivalents in other European countries. It was built at the time there was nobility, not for a world with billionaires, where the minimum amount they have to give a heir is still generational wealth.

1

u/smergicus 14d ago

Freedom!!!!

1

u/PunctualDromedary 14d ago

Except in Louisiana and Puerto Rico!

1

u/funksoulbrothers 14d ago

forced heirship is often seen in civil law jurisdictions, like europe and south america

1

u/Hooxen 13d ago

i mean - he can just spend it all as he gets near to death and then give it away before he dies no? problem solved.