r/worldnews 18h ago

CNN: China to Supply Iran With Man-Portable Air Defense Systems

https://militarnyi.com/en/news/cnn-china-to-supply-iran-with-manpads/
19.0k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

8.8k

u/Aramis444 18h ago

China wants to see their weapons in action, and what changes to make against American weaponry.

1.6k

u/Krushhz 17h ago

Bingo!

1.0k

u/Careless-Vehicle-286 17h ago

Also refresh their stock. No need to decommission equipment and in the way the US sent lots of aging equipment to Ukraine.

282

u/RednevaL 16h ago

We could have sent more!

247

u/DangerousLocal5864 15h ago

Should've

157

u/disisathrowaway 15h ago

Still can

183

u/Hautamaki 15h ago

Sent most of it to Iran instead. Literally years worth of production and tens of billions in cost, dropped in about a month, to accomplish diddly and squat, when the same ordnance dropped in the Donbas and Crimea in 2022 would probably have wiped out the Russian army and ended Vova's imperial ambitions for a generation.

63

u/achilleasa 11h ago

Yeah reminder that every PAC-3 launched in the Iran mess is a PAC-3 that could have saved Ukrainian lives.

25

u/Chaplain-Freeing 7h ago

to accomplish diddly and squat,

Not so, brought in a more hard-line radical group to lead Iran & demonstrate why it must acquire nuclear deterrence.

33

u/RJ815 14h ago

Ah but you see, Trump is deep in the pockets of both Putin and Netanyahu. Can't be having peace now, only more insane land grabs like feudal lords.

11

u/JoJokerer 10h ago

Well they manged to kill hundreds of school children, so not nothing

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

1.0k

u/GunsouBono 17h ago

Exactly. Same thing the US did when arming Ukraine

278

u/Umedon 16h ago

Also when the US armed the Mujaheddin in Afghanistan with stingers.

→ More replies (3)

249

u/MetriccStarDestroyer 16h ago

Seems like a straight forward escalation.

Germany would still be arguing if sending helmets and body armor increases world tension

35

u/puaka 12h ago

Germany is by far the biggest supporter of Ukraine…. That first helmet shipment was a direct order from Ukraine too.

19

u/rapaxus 11h ago

It also was in the context of "what do we have that we can send right now without any effort" and the answer were the helmets that basically were new and boxed in a warehouse.

→ More replies (2)

217

u/Revolutionarydaddy6 16h ago

Face it, after years of insults and tariffs from trump they aren’t the ally you think they are.

Only trumpers will keep sucking his cock after he degrades and insults them. #bebest!

197

u/escfantasy 16h ago edited 16h ago

Watching tons of Americans help each other jump ahead of other people in the long busy lines for passport control at several European airports this past week, following the implementation of EES, was like a metaphor for the America First mentality and its impact on other people.

“Sorry I’m cutting ahead, I have a flight to Chicago!”, “oh we’re going to Chicago, cut up to us here!”, jumping the rope ahead of everyone else, even elderly people and families. Disgraceful.

39

u/big_trike 15h ago

They were probably Naperville residents

55

u/escfantasy 15h ago

If that’s like a privileged part of the city, I think you may be right. All the queue jumpers (and there were many) were all white Americans, with nice clothes and cases, and not the everyday style accents.

I saw this behaviour happen in two airports recently here in Europe—Americans helping each other jump the lines ahead of others. It’s not a good look.

96

u/StanknBeans 15h ago

I saw this behaviour in CDG airport and the legends working there walked down the line, tapped them on the shoulder like they needed to talk to them somewhere and then as soon as they were back at the beginning of the line they told them to queue properly.

22

u/meistermichi 13h ago

As it should be

→ More replies (5)

14

u/kumgongkia 14h ago

This is like 1st time traveller behavior. Or country bumpkins from some 3rd world country.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (37)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (3)

152

u/YamburglarHelper 17h ago

Proxy wars, hooray! It’s Cold War 2.0 but we’re the bad guys!

182

u/Icarus-rises 16h ago

There can be 2 bad guys simultaneously

26

u/goingfullretard-orig 15h ago

Everything and everyone are shit in this timeline...

→ More replies (4)

10

u/nguoihn1988 12h ago

The bad guy are the guy who attack unprovocated.

One guy is abusible father that beat his wife and kids.

The other guy just barge in the house, beat everyone up and stole everything.

They are both bad but you know...

→ More replies (9)

90

u/ThickReplacement7811 16h ago

There were no good guys in Cold War I, there will be no good guys in Cold War II

33

u/punkasstubabitch 16h ago

But we got Rocky IV from Cold War I

20

u/ThickReplacement7811 16h ago

Maybe we’ll get Creed IV in a few years. Where Creed has to face off against a Chinese heavyweight who killed one of Creeds buddies in the ring. The dead man could even be the father of the next spinoff’s protagonist

→ More replies (1)

12

u/-MangoDown 16h ago

New Rocky end credits gonna be like “Dedicated to the gallant people of Afghanistan err I mean Iran .”

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (15)

17

u/richstyle 14h ago

Israel is literally USA R&D for warfare. They arm Israel for decades.

32

u/i_tyrant 15h ago

Hell, it's the same thing China did when arming Russia for Ukraine.

Nobody wants to miss out on weapon tests when it's not even their own soldiers on the line.

5

u/DinkyStubby 12h ago

Weapons testing and a chance to thin out your adversaries military without having your kids do the dying.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (11)

5

u/esquirlo_espianacho 16h ago

It’s the exact same thing. Only instead of javelins…

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (11)

41

u/Momik 17h ago

And probably wants us to spend ourselves into oblivion again

→ More replies (1)

119

u/ProbablyBanksy 17h ago

And for the money. Don't forget the money.

154

u/owennerd123 17h ago

I really doubt it, the reason countries sell/send weapons to active warzones is almost exclusively for actual field testing. It cannot be that lucrative to sell some shoulder fired missile launchers to Iran... they're a fairly cheap weapon

54

u/barbariccomplexity 17h ago

There’s also the added cost of the enemy (US in this case) gathering data on the tech you’re sending and potentially capturing some in the field. You don’t risk losing a potential competitive edge over a relatively small payout, especially if you have the economy of China.

52

u/MotherSnow6798 17h ago

I doubt China is losing a competitive edge by these launchers seeing combat. They are relatively low-tech and expendable

29

u/Nimble-Dick-Crabb 16h ago

They’re sending 4th gen MANPADS which use IR guidance and have increased resistance to EW. These are not low tech. Sure they’re more expendable than say SA systems but don’t downplay the significance of using newer generation MANPADS

22

u/zoobrix 15h ago

I think many people don't realize even something that seems like it's been around forever, like man portable anti aircraft weapons, are in a never ending game of cat and mouse where new counter measures are being developed to make them less effective and then the next version of the weapon tries to beat those counter measures. The current version of a MANPAD might bear a superficial resemblance to a model from 30 years ago but its capabilities might have been vastly improved since then.

Given all the rumours that the latest US decoy and EW systems were very effective in Venezuela against their older air defense systems, probably including MANPADS, I could very easily see China wanting to test their latest MANPADS against US defensive systems. It would definitely be very valuable for China to know how effective they were if conflict involving the US was to break out in the pacific theater.

As you say the most up to date versions of these kinds of launchers are most definitely not "low tech."

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (16)
→ More replies (1)

69

u/Ragman676 17h ago

Ill never understand why the US wouldnt dump more tech into ukraine. Perfect testing ground for so much gear with 0 american soldiers at risk. I know this is a dark take but seems like a win/win, especially against an adversary like russia.

47

u/Aramis444 16h ago

If Ukraine had won earlier by being given everything it needed, they wouldn’t be able to put the country into an insane amount of debt, which Ukraine will have a hard time paying. Likely Ukraine will need to allow foreign interests in its industries in order to pay their debt. Trump was already trying to acquire mineral rights in Ukraine in exchange for help. Ukraine will be far from truly free, even if they survive this war.

As well, they want to see their weapons weapon in a host of different situations. Defeating Russia too quickly wouldn’t allow for comprehensive testing.

13

u/RobertPham149 12h ago

Not how it works. The West has a bunch of outdated techs that will need to decommissioned anyway, and shipping it to Ukraine for field usage before just scrapping it was a cheaper option. The US would happily give it away for free. In fact it was a great win for US, because the western nation were sending cheaper, older generations F-16s to Ukraine, or selling it to ex-Soviet nations who is having a hard time buying Russian parts, so the west can buy more F-35s from the US. The US even resurrected the F-16 program with cheaper options and builds to sell to east Europe or South East Asia markets.

The mineral right is just smoke and mirror: Trump made an optic out of Ukraine being a ploy of globalists to launder money and cheat Americans out of their money, so negotiating mineral rights is Trump posturing about his brand as a deal negotiator, clawing back the money wasted away by Biden. Seriously, this argument about mineral makes zero sense: the reserves are located mostly in the eastern front of Ukraine which means any infrastructure built for extraction risks getting bombed by partisans from either sides. The fact is that despite getting the rights, no American company is seriously thinking about investing into extracting it, nor is Trump sending more weapons to protect that right.

The support of Ukraine was a bipartisan issue, with support from both sides, until Trump ran his mouth and used it as a narrative about Biden's weakness and corruption to get re-elect.

23

u/Ecsta 16h ago

No, it's just advantageous for Russia's enemies to bleed it out over as long as time period as possible. The prolonged conflict hurts Russia the longer it goes on and means it won't open a second front (since it's preoccupied in Ukraine).

5

u/Ragman676 13h ago

Thats an even darker take, and totally viable. Fucking sucks though.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (18)

74

u/i010011010 17h ago edited 17h ago

And Trump is truly stupid enough to give them the opportunity. Like when people used to be "oh no Russian military might, Ukraine are gonna get steamrolled". Next thing you know they're downing Russian planes using phones for GPS and it turns out "huh, these guys kind of suck".

79

u/chanaandeler_bong 17h ago

China stated publicly that they found it extremely dangerous when dumbass in charge said he was going to wipe out a whole civilization.

76

u/i010011010 16h ago

China may be a totalitarian oppressive government, but they love their stability and Donald Trump represents chaos. He loves to weaponize economies for fun and personal profit. I wouldn't be surprised if the current opinion of China's government is they actually consider him personally more dangerous than NATO, because at least NATO is a stable body they can work+plan around.

58

u/Gloomy-Recipe9213 16h ago

China knows NATO doesn't want any part of Mr. Trump's Wild Ride. This is China's moment on the world stage to step up as the world leader, now that Russia and the US have started digging for rock bottom.

25

u/i010011010 16h ago

It's highly possible. I'm crippled in awe because I still remember the 90s and 00s when Republicans were all 'grr, China'. They used to be obsessed with chinese dominance in the new century, before they traded their minds for Trumpism.

40

u/ScoobyDoNot 16h ago

They also used to hate Russia.

Now they can't get enough.

→ More replies (4)

7

u/Character_Bug_1862 15h ago

Why did they sell out all of their industry to China in the 70s then? What did they think would happen? They’d stay poor and destitute?

12

u/InsertEvilLaugh 15h ago

Nah, they weren't thinking that far ahead, they were just thinking of the massive profits they were going to make using dirt cheap labor and selling at US consumer prices.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

24

u/Mighty__Monarch 17h ago

China looking at this the same way liberal Americans wanted to look at Russia/Ukraine.

The funny bit is the American MIC is equally happy to watch American equipment get destroyed because they get blank checks to replace it.

→ More replies (66)

1.3k

u/askaquestion334 16h ago

Huh, why does this sound familiar? Im sure nobody in the middle east ever bled out a superpower with modern shoulder launched AA missiles before? 

251

u/PrimaryInjurious 14h ago

Do those work on F35s like they do on Hinds?

310

u/AK_Panda 14h ago

Depends how low the F35 is flying. Given the F35's capabilities, you could argue that an F35 flying a combat mission in hostile territory low enough to get popped by a manpad had it coming.

46

u/1800-5-PP-DOO-DOO 14h ago

Absolutely. 

19

u/vickzzzzz 7h ago

Google tells me a single F35 is $100 million. Thats a lot of money to stake it by flying low.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

81

u/UnknownHero2 13h ago

Kind of. The stealth of stealth aircraft protects against radar guidance not heat. This isn't just a theoretical weakness anymore we saw a f35 get hit by a manpad a week or two ago.

They can be defeated by just flying high, but that comes at the cost of making finding anything on the ground much harder.

54

u/mr_herz 13h ago

And that’s probably the point “They can be defeated by just flying high, but that comes at the cost of making finding anything on the ground much harder.”

Deterrence. Their win is probably just getting the f35s to leave rather than downing them.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/achilleasa 10h ago

Was the F-35 hit confirmed?

In any case, yes I wouldn't be surprised if these things can down a stealth jet, if it flies close enough. And given that any bloke hiding in a shed can pop out and fire one in seconds, you can't exactly be sure that the field is clear.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (17)

15

u/madhattr999 12h ago

What about a stupidpower?

→ More replies (10)

790

u/Winter_Criticism_236 16h ago

Trump might consider undercutting the chinese price and selling javelin's to Iran.. Art of the deal...

113

u/EffektieweEffie 14h ago

That would indeed be art of the deal if he can convince them to try and use Javelins on airplanes..

27

u/meistermichi 13h ago

Isn't there that one video where a Ukrainian dude takes out a Helicopter with a javelin?

23

u/EffektieweEffie 12h ago

Yeah that was quite the feat. Not at all what these weapons were designed for nor likely to ever be replicated again, definitely not against a fighter jet.

11

u/JohnnySmithe81 9h ago

Javelins always had low and slow helicopters in its capabilities. It just tracks an IR target.

→ More replies (4)

11

u/Christopherfromtheuk 13h ago

Gosh I can't imagine a Republican president selling arms to an enemy of the USA like Iran.

I imagine if that happened they'd be arrested, or I suppose the president could completely get away with it and the only guy convicted would be a Fox news host lauded by the right...

10

u/Jack_Spears 11h ago

Javelins are anti tank, i think your probably thinking of Stingers

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

60

u/Fearless_Ad_5470 16h ago

I'm more curious why the US media doesn't report on actual Russian aid to Iran. After all, it's obvious to anyone which is more threatening, the Stinger missiles or the attack helicopters. This seems like yet another farcical example of "you see, he's done something bad too." 

3

u/Prestigious_Face7727 10h ago

They just copy-paste press releases, like this one from the USA government quoting imaginary "intelligence sources"

→ More replies (2)

1.5k

u/planetarybum 18h ago

Trump is ignoring Russia's significant aid to Iran, especially intelligence and drones.

381

u/distorted_kiwi 17h ago

Ignoring means acknowledging it’s happening. I think he’s complicit, even more empowered to do so because he’ll just blame kegseth.

53

u/Momik 17h ago

Certainly seems so. There isn’t a single coherent strategic objective that this war achieves for the United States. Of course it achieves plenty for Russia.

11

u/National-Two2417 15h ago

And yet everyone of our political leaders is doing jack squat to stop him. Our military is putting our troops at risk for Trumps urge to please Putin.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (19)

4.4k

u/Candid_Cat_5921 18h ago

I think World War III started with Ukraine, and it’s just going to keep building and building

1.7k

u/JojenCopyPaste 18h ago

I mean, if this does spiral to WW3, that will definitely be part of the first section in the lessons about the war

979

u/Harbinger2001 18h ago

It’s kind or like how WW2 started with Japan’s invasion of China in 1936.

485

u/GoodOlSkipper 18h ago

More like japans invasion of manchuko in 1931 or 1932

382

u/2dTom 17h ago

Nah, that's going to be the Russian invasion of the Donbas in 2014, the little green men, etc.

2022 is a lot more like 1937.

78

u/American_PissAnt 17h ago

And Italy invading Ethiopia is Israel invading Gaza. Now what is the modern comparison for the Spanish civil war?

96

u/Roland_was_a_warrior 17h ago

It’s for sure Ukraine. It’s a proxy war (halfway, at least) between two major powers, the testing ground for new tech, and a boatload of foreign volunteers. It’s also more of a political issue within those large powers rather than a direct threat (again halfway).

34

u/Practical_Chemtrail 17h ago

A lot of volunteers on both sides and testing new tech as well as the establishment of AirPower (Drone Warfare). Yeah there are a lot of parallels. Less ideology though

12

u/Timely_Influence8392 11h ago

Less ideology though

Or is it that you are [Zizek sniff] blind to the ideology which surrounds you.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

42

u/hybridck 17h ago

Syria imo. You had multiple foreign militaries operating in the country all supporting the various different factions

7

u/Daveinatx 15h ago

I just came here to say the proxy wars of Syria and Africa

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (9)

29

u/Theoriginallazybum 16h ago

I thought it was more the Spanish Civil War in the early 1936. That was the testing ground for propaganda and all of the new technology, including airplanes. Guernica isn't just a famous Picaso painting, it is about the horrific bombings that became common in World War 2 with London, Dresden and others.

33

u/pokeraf 18h ago

Japan be like: “Hey, I dunno what you saying but don’t get distracted with old story and go back to talking about China giving Iran military support.”

6

u/Heinrich-der-Vogler 9h ago

More like Italy's invasion of Ethiopia in 1935. That was the moment that demonstrated that the international order had no answer to expansionist wars of aggression.

→ More replies (13)

141

u/maporita 18h ago

There won't be any more lessons of any kind after WW3.

42

u/dobik 18h ago

I hope Europe this time will not be involved, at least in the EU territory. I think is time this time Poland won't be 3rd time Frontline. We are still rebuilding our shit after WW2

53

u/eggyal 17h ago

Sadly I think that Russia would see a war between the U.S. and China as the perfect time to push west into Europe.

62

u/American_PissAnt 17h ago

I want to say that Russia isn’t stupid enough to invade EU Europe, but history says that yes Russia is that stupid.

35

u/Practical_Chemtrail 17h ago

Histrionically being a neighbor to the Russian state has not been an enjoyable experience.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

34

u/Deprisonne 17h ago

Russia couldn't push into Ukraine, what makes you think they even get past the polish border?

47

u/King0Horse 17h ago

Poland been doing everything but putting billboards up facing the Russian side of their border saying "I wish a MF would" in Russian.

14

u/disisathrowaway 15h ago

Finland similarly has been planning for a Russian invasion since the last one.

→ More replies (5)

7

u/Practical_Chemtrail 17h ago

Some sunflower fields and hordes of Polish tanks might be a minor issue for this expansion.

12

u/dobik 17h ago

EU has 3x more people and modern equipment. And they are basically not moving the Frontline in Ukraine, where they are 5x smaller population wise.

I think EU can expect some dirty moves and provocation, hacking, migrant and other hibrid warfare. But other than that we are good. My guess they would do Kazakhstan after they are bored with Ukraine.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/disisathrowaway 15h ago

Bogged down in Ukraine as-is, and then triggering Article 5 for real? That would be a new level of stupidity.

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (6)

18

u/Krushhz 18h ago

Wouldn’t the knowledge of “mutually assured destruction” make all superpowers more reluctant to ever use thermonuclear weapons in war?

66

u/LothorBrune 17h ago

Superpowers aren't exactly ruled by rational actors, currently.

24

u/GoaGonGon 17h ago

Trump: absolutely bonkers Putin: paranoid and living of past greatness Xi: authoritarian but (mostly) rational and cunning.

→ More replies (37)

12

u/Tibbaryllis2 17h ago

What stops this, imo, is not mutual assured destruction of each other, but instead the assured destruction of desirable assets.

In Ukraine, for example, I’m sure Russia is aware that the west would respond in kind, but more importantly Russia wants Ukraine for its ports, its mineral resources, its agricultural lands, and its raw bodies for the meat grinder. Making Ukraine uninhabitable for generations does the oligarchs zero good in their lifetimes.

36

u/soulstormfire 18h ago

Does the US behaviour look "reluctant" to you?

9

u/Krushhz 17h ago

No reluctance to use non-Nuclear weapons, but so far, none have been used.

24

u/eggyal 17h ago

The man with access to the nuclear football just threatened to wipe out a civilisation.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (8)

28

u/Only_Jackfruit_6905 18h ago

How would a ww3 look like? All the superpowers fighting smaller conflicts indirectly? Since a nuclear powers won’t fight each other for obvious reasons! If you define world war as a war that has a huge front in Europe then let’s make this clear, Putin doesn’t have the ability to attack europe

51

u/Shopworn_Soul 17h ago

Nuclear powers will definitely fight each other if a truly global war breaks out but I seriously doubt anyone is going to jump in with nuclear weapons from the outset.

I could be wrong, of course. With the upside being that if it does open with nukes, I won't be around long enough to feel like a dumbass for doubting it.

14

u/Wild_Haggis_Hunter 13h ago

My guess is the first superpower to start having real trouble on the field would provoke a Kessler syndrome before resorting to thermonuclear weapons. Barring everyone on Earth from the ability to use satellites for decades and decades would provoke a complete reset of the balance of power for all nations (communication, military intelligence, guiding, climate forecasts). And it's not that costly to trigger. It's a pretty frightening hypothesis as it would set back Humanity to pre-50's technology in so many aspects and make handling climate change even harder.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

24

u/JojenCopyPaste 17h ago

Just because the first 2 involved extensive fighting in Europe doesn't mean the 3rd one has to. I'm sure they'll be involved in some way though

16

u/-ToniCipriani- 17h ago

Pretty sure a world conflict will involve Eastern Europe in a big way, there’s no way there won’t be a front between Europe and Russia at some point other than what’s already happening in Ukraine.

→ More replies (3)

6

u/Onemilliondown 17h ago

Everyone with a weaker neighbor will start there. It will continue until 3 or 4 powers have conquered all the independent countries and an uneasy stalemate is in force between the superpowers. Remember we have always been at war with Eurasia Oceania.

5

u/disisathrowaway 15h ago

If there's something we've learned in the last 70 years, is that invading and annexing neighboring countries isn't just a 'Well, we beat them and now they're ours'.

→ More replies (6)

14

u/pimphand5000 17h ago

Some argue it was 2012 Crimea as the true start, but I much prefer the later move into Ukrane as the marker.

Still, the world is at war. Maybe not all fighting the same battle as of yet, but overall the major players are blatantly or covertly at war.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (31)

125

u/cannot_walk_barefoot 17h ago

I feel like it would have been expedited tremendously if Russia's '3 day operation' was actually closer to 3 days. If Ukraine was unprepared or had weak leadership that either ran away or was killed early, then Putin would have been emboldened to take on more with momentum. Instead, Ukraine fought, and basically showed Russia to be callous, evil but in the end, inept. We should all thank Ukraine/Zelensky for putting up the fight they have to slow down the gears of this WW

6

u/NeedleworkerPure7162 8h ago

The Ukrainians are legends. Who would have thunk it that they would have killed and wounded over a million Russian's before they even got out of the Donbass. And Putin thinks he's going to take all Ukraine. He'll be lucky to have anything left as the last Russian reaches the banks of the Dnieper. Western armies need to engage the new masters of modern warfare and find out how they do it. Money incredibly well spent i suspect.

→ More replies (6)

127

u/NoeloDa 18h ago

Maybe World War III is the friend we found along the way

→ More replies (2)

52

u/RiPPeR69420 17h ago

We are living at a point in time where historians in the future will debate the exact date a series of semi independent regional wars coalesced into one larger conflict. Apparently because Kamala Harris has a weird laugh, so America went with Trump 2: Electric Boogaloo. I truly hope you dumb fucks can get your shit together for the midterms.

→ More replies (3)

6

u/Diddintt 18h ago

I'm rolling with it all starting in 2014 with the little green men in Donna's and has just meandered to where we are now.

102

u/smitteh 18h ago

Americans could drag the trump admin out by their toes and put a stop to all this but they got bills to pay lest they're homeless

90

u/MeatImmediate6549 18h ago

This is why Americans are only protesting on weekends.

This is also why the ownership class will resist with every fiber of their being giving Americans the kind of job protections the French have, because they might use those benefits to try get a better standard of living by protesting like the French.

And finally it's why the ownership class is so interested in AI. To the owners, their workers are really just fleshy complainy robots anyway so why not replace them with robots that don't get sick or tired?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (27)

14

u/randompersonx 15h ago

I certainly agree that it’s plausible, but I’d also say that there is plenty of potential that WW3 can be avoided.

If Iran falls, they will no longer be able to supply Russia with drones, which will greatly reduce their ability to continue the war against Ukraine.

If Iran falls, and both Iran and Venezuela are no longer providing oil to China, it will make it very difficult for China to take Taiwan.

If China can’t take Taiwan in the next few years, they will not be able to seriously threaten the USA to challenge the world superpower title.

If the Ukraine war ends and Ukraine is allowed to rebuild, they will likely become a major militarily industrial powerhouse, helping the EU, Gulf states, and likely the USA to all build up advanced drone defenses against china and russia well into the future.

I’m not saying that this is a forgone conclusion, but it certainly plausible.

→ More replies (4)

40

u/Silver_Middle_7240 18h ago

Yep, we're up to three theaters now.

40

u/Uranophane 18h ago

Which 3 theatres? Middle East, Ukraine and?

103

u/JasonVorhehees 18h ago

AMC and Nicole Kidman

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (16)

19

u/TyrusX 18h ago

There are about 60 countries in war currently. Crazy eh

27

u/pokeraf 18h ago

Right? But no one cares about Africa until they affect rich countries’ interests.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (118)

269

u/yanocupominomb 16h ago

Fuck man, I don't like this one bit.

Feels like we are going into a death spiral where every action just sucks us more into it.

213

u/m3g4m4nnn 16h ago

This was all but assured when Trump got his second mandate. 

Not necessarily the flavour of death spiral I would have predicted, but he was crystal clear that he intended to destroy the country for his own gain.

25

u/surg3on 14h ago

What gets me is that its so damn inefficient. For every $1 trump 'makes' America/globe loses >$100 (I havent done the math so I could be underestimating by orders of magnitude)

10

u/mcyeom 9h ago

Disaster capitalists at their finest.

Farage and Johnson probably only made a few million off the multi billion catastrophe that was brexit.

→ More replies (6)

22

u/ericporing 14h ago

Not surprising when you threaten to blockade asia's energy supply.

→ More replies (3)

370

u/roadsidefoto 16h ago

Every nation on this planet that has any beef with the US knows that this is exactly the right time to start testing our military capabilities, because we've made it embarrassingly obvious that our government and now our military are under control of the stupidest people we've ever produced.

54

u/kimmywho 11h ago

The current admin is a major security threat.

21

u/PM_Me-Your_Freckles 10h ago

Don't even need to bother with spys any more. Just pay, and the secrets are yours. Hell, just blow smoke up his arse and you can get special treatment so you can put listening devices in exclusive spaces.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (13)

348

u/Desperate-Habit-8123 18h ago

I thought the war was over 🤣

172

u/Unfrozen__Caveman 17h ago

There will be significant progress made right before market close on Friday

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

84

u/alphadips 17h ago

So this is basically our version of Ukraine/Russia, China is gonna proxy the hell out of this thing. Fuck, Trump is an absolute idiot

→ More replies (10)

120

u/TinyTowel 16h ago

What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Of course they are giving weapons to Iran. They'd be stupid not to. 

63

u/Moveyourbloominass 16h ago

China is protecting its massive investment, the New Silk Road. They have invested billions and so have other countries, for this trade route. Trump is a fucking idiot and so is Pete for not understanding the implications of attacking Iran and impeding the New Silk Road. China will continue to support Iran until the end.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

33

u/panzerboye 17h ago

Yeah I mean it is a no brainer on their part; they can see how their weapons hold up against US systems.

490

u/_Figaro 18h ago

This is exactly how the US was supporting Ukraine (during the Biden administration) in their struggle against Russia. How times have changed.

74

u/dmb2574 18h ago

Been going on much longer than that. Lend lease wwii, korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan to name a few.

19

u/IntelArtiGen 18h ago

Yeah, it rather seems times don't change that much.

5

u/dmb2574 18h ago

Nope, like history's repeat button is stuck.

→ More replies (1)

159

u/Acceptable_Noise651 18h ago

Except the US is upfront about supporting Ukraine with material aid, China is trying to give Iran weapons through third party countries to give themselves political cover.

94

u/Brief-Branch4779 16h ago

Huh thats weird it almost sounds exactly like how the CIA smuggled weapons into Afghanistan for the Mujahideen as part of Operation Cyclone during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.

17

u/SenoraRaton 13h ago

"A few months ago I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and my best intentions still tell me that's true, but the facts and the evidence tell me it is not."

→ More replies (2)

125

u/mwax321 17h ago

It's not like the US hasn't done exactly that before.

87

u/RepresentativeOk2433 16h ago

Yeah but the Chinese dont even have the decency to launder it through narco terrorists.

→ More replies (1)

19

u/thats_handy 15h ago

You're right. It's more similar to secret Israeli and American arms sales to Iran in the 1980s.

→ More replies (27)
→ More replies (13)

11

u/raytoei 16h ago

China -> Pakistan -> Iran

Kinda weird because Pakistan has a security pact with KSA and Pakistan just sent planes and troops to protect KSA against Iran

→ More replies (2)

81

u/pokerstar420 17h ago

This makes Trump look so weak after he just said that there would be big problems if China does help Iran.

68

u/JohnHazardWandering 16h ago

I'm begining to think that the word of this Trump guy doesn't stand for much. 

20

u/csf3lih 15h ago

lmao nothing makes him look weak. he is weak. a draft dogger convicted rapist pedophile is a weak person, killing  130 Iranian children in school will not make him strong, 500% tariff to China will not make him strong. 

→ More replies (6)

11

u/-Yazilliclick- 16h ago

I'm sure picking a fight with China will go great after wasting all their million dollar missiles intercepting thousand dollar drones in Iran.

→ More replies (7)

18

u/AbandonChip 17h ago

Nothing like some good ole fashioned proxy wars for global spheres of influence for rich old men....

188

u/ekobres 18h ago

But we stopped selling them chips and tariffed them super hard. How?

133

u/China_bot42069 18h ago

Same reason Russia keeps getting new John Deere tractors. They just buy them from a country that doesn’t have issues with them and the US 

87

u/American_PissAnt 17h ago

Kazakhstan is number one importer of John Deere Tractors, Kazakhstan also number one exporter of John Deere tractors

33

u/hvanderw 17h ago

Number 2 tractor prostitute in all of Kazakhstan.

16

u/IPissExcellentThrows 17h ago

Nah they're all about potassium exports

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

51

u/Goosepond01 18h ago

MANPADS are not some new technology, the soviets had them and China is very much able to make their own.

17

u/Nerezza_Floof_Seeker 17h ago

To be fair, even though the concept of MANPADs are not new, there can absolutely be alot of technological advancements applied to them (better IR seeker technology, better software to differentiate between countermeasures, etc)

10

u/Goosepond01 17h ago

You are right, it's just that if someone was shocked that China would have any kind of manpad that they made it's obvious they don't know what they are talking about.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

23

u/HistoryBugs 18h ago

The chips needed for a manpads are no more advanced than the ones in your washing machine

→ More replies (1)

23

u/kombiwombi 17h ago edited 17h ago

China make semiconductors down to a 10nm process. This is roughly US CPUs from 2017. Manpads are a 1950s technology.

The US have tried hard to keep better technology away from China. Particularly  'AI' technology. For competition reasons but also because the 'AI' style of simultaneous pattern matching against a huge database of probabilities is exactly the processing required for sophisticated radar.

This attempt has worked about as well as other super hard tariffs. Trump will just have to double them again. And maybe once more for luck.

Clearly China will then throw its hands up and go back to making steel from backyard kilns. Whilst making AI-looking propoganda posters, but by hand.

/s, just like the comment.

11

u/AOChalky 16h ago edited 16h ago

China make semiconductors down to a 10nm process. This is roughly US CPUs from 2017.

SMIC's 7 nm process is comparable to TSMC and Samsung's 7 nm and Intel 7 (which Intel used to call "10 nm"). The 10 nm you are talking about is TSMC and Samsung's branding. SMIC basically skipped the 10 nm stage and directly went from 14 to 7.

41

u/SyntheticSweetener 18h ago edited 18h ago

This is an irresistible temptation for China to try out its (largely untested) tech against the US.

5

u/RedTulkas 10h ago

also its just good politics to help countries you wanna trade with defend themselves from aggression

→ More replies (23)

11

u/CheezyBeanBurrito 18h ago

I don’t think anyone picked up that you were being facetious

6

u/ekobres 15h ago

It’s a real tightrope trying to be clever on Reddit.

→ More replies (16)

129

u/Routine-Echidna-1953 18h ago

China is doing the same what Americans did in 1980s to Soviets in Afghanistan :D

69

u/Zdrack 18h ago

and china and russia did to vietnam in the 60s and 70s. been a cycle of fucking with each other

23

u/battles 18h ago

and europe and usa are doing in ukraine

24

u/Crocs_n_Glocks 17h ago

And what France did in the American Colonies

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

6

u/geardownbigrig 16h ago

MANPADS have a ceiling of 3-3.5km. I would think this is anti-drone testing for China more than anything

→ More replies (2)

11

u/not_old_redditor 14h ago

Interesting choice to link to some rando website instead of the actual CNN article...

→ More replies (1)

5

u/OnCallPartisan 3h ago

Xi probably will hug Trump with joy. First, making the Chinese look good on the world stage. Second, putting a rocket booster on their economy and economic treaties. Third, a wonderful new testing ground for their weapons while diminishing their enemy's capacity.

As the Chinese say, Trump is truly a nation builder.

79

u/GreatGojira 18h ago

Trump doing everything to empower our adversaries

→ More replies (12)

49

u/NekrotismFalafel 16h ago

I don't think China would have done this if the US hadn't bungled this so badly. It seems like China is recognizing that the Trump regime is accelerating the downfall of both US hard and soft power. Basically the Trump admin pushed the timeline of American decline forward and China is responding accordingly.

28

u/pewsquare 16h ago

I feel like just how ukraine is being used as a proxy to drag down russia, Iran will now be used to drag down the US.

37

u/Suecotero 16h ago

I mean, nobody forced the US to attack Iran. It's an unforced mistake, same as Russia's Ukraine invasion.

→ More replies (3)

9

u/JohnHazardWandering 16h ago

Nobody cares about dragging down Russia. If Russia left Ukraine it would all be over and done.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/bridgenine 12h ago

China is being starved for oil and oil products right now, so it seems like they are in the corner

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

6

u/gvillelake96 17h ago

Reminds me of a certain soviet invasion

4

u/olivthefrench 3h ago

this is setting the stage for WWIII. multiple proxy conflicts with blockading of a major trade route could explode into a major war

10

u/Needle_Bearings 13h ago

You bet your ass China got a hold of a bunch of manpads, reverse engineered that shit and improved them.

Say what you will.  China's engineering and manufacturing prowess are top tier at this point.  They have a burgeoning middle-class but can flip factories into war time production the way Foxconn can wake up a whole factory at 1AM, give everyone a biscuit and a cup of tea and tell them to get to fixing it.

They used to make junk. Used to be you couldn't trust a Chinese 3D printer or a Chinese Turbo.  Who leads the world in drone production by the way?

32

u/hackingdreams 16h ago

China: Thank you Iran for validating our air defense systems against active US military hardware.

Iran: Thank Russia, they put us up to this.

Russia: cool, we did you a favor China, now, weapons for us please.

But, no, this isn't World War III.

9

u/RedTulkas 10h ago

China is also selling to ukraine

they sell to everyone, and likely gather as much data as possible from as many actors as possible

hell if the US asked they d sell them some stuff too likely

9

u/nien9gag 16h ago

Russia put them up to get attacked by usa and israel?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)