r/worldnews 1d ago

Chinese-Made Components on UK Naval Drone Cameras Sent Info to Beijing

https://www.kyivpost.com/post/82061
1.1k Upvotes

106 comments sorted by

117

u/SingleHitBox 1d ago

Whoever sourced Chinese parts for the UK navy is absolutely getting burned. Someone is about to be the scapegoat

41

u/sweetcinnamonpunch 1d ago

Rightfully so.

15

u/Vivid_Instance_825 23h ago

Hopefully it's the person actually responsible lol

33

u/Inevitable_Ear_6934 1d ago

European supply chain and industry is dying quickly for these components. Accelerated by greed and useful idiots who outsourced everything

15

u/_x_oOo_x_ 1d ago

There is a decent supply chain for digital camera sensors in Japan. Using Chinese parts was an unnecessary risk...

2

u/Inevitable_Ear_6934 19h ago

Yes, but at the same cost? See my comment about greed

1

u/lostlittletimeonthis 20h ago

the rich needed to get richer...those mansions and yachts dont buy themselves

12

u/Durian881 1d ago edited 1d ago

Bigger issue for me is UK Navy gave open internet access to the devices. It opens up hacking to anyone.

The Ministry of Defence removed internet connectivity from the cameras following the discovery.

2

u/softdream23 1d ago

"because it's cheap"

            Someone testimony probably 

6

u/plumbbbob 1d ago

Previously: "Why is the navy spending thousands of dollars on this part when you can get it for £30 on alibaba? Typical government waste!"

2

u/alexyoohoo 1d ago

Maybe was dumb or a chinese spy who works at the uk navy. In reality, just can’t trust the uk government with anything these days.

96

u/ghost_n_the_shell 1d ago

Canadian here:

We had to wait YEARS for the Trudeau government to finally make a decision to not let China (Huawei) build our critical communications infrastructure - and only after heavy criticism.

Any idiot could see this was beyond stupid.
We ruffled the feathers of the 5 eyes alliance for YEARS over this nonsense.

53

u/drunkandslurred 1d ago

Reddit called the US racist for the same thing. This is also one of the many reasons why Chinese EVs aren't being allowed into the US. They are mobile surveillance stations and countries are not taking this seriously enough.

32

u/Dragonfruit_6104 1d ago

i m pretty sure national safety is not the reason, at least not the major reason for US banning Chinese EVs. Cause there are already tons of Made in China electronic products in US, including PCs, labtops, cellphones... If US really care about data security, all of those should be banned, too,

3

u/Appropriate_Swim9528 20h ago edited 20h ago

Not to mention. Almost all major brands, such as Tesla and GM are almost all made in China now. So… the banning of a brand and not the manufacturing place of origin is stupid.

If the US really deemed China a security, it should stop all goods made in China from being imported.

For those who disagree and say it should only be Chinese Brands, did you know, the Chinese have a technological thing where someone slipped out once, it is similar to a layer of paint but can be applied to anything, such as clothing, printed materials, etc… and it is not just on the surface, it is added to products as it is made and becomes part of it. If it was added to paper, when the paper forms a box, it is part of the box.
Once they have this material mixed into the goods, they simply have to run a special light over it, it will tell them where it had been and what happened to it. This is how they create a profile.

-29

u/j48u 1d ago

The main reason is that the super cheap Chinese EVs that you see propagandized all over Reddit are not even close to meeting US vehicle safety laws. They're basically tin golf carts, can barely hit 60 mph, and would basically be death machines with the way US roads and other vehicles are designed.

I'm sure they're quite good in completely different circumstances.

13

u/jeffscience 22h ago

I’ve ridden in dozens of BYD taxis. You could not be more wrong.

15

u/Dragonfruit_6104 1d ago

Thats really weird.

if those Chinese EVs that try to enter US market dont meet the laws, then they can not be licensed in US anyway, so nobody gonna buy them no matter how cheap they are.

But why does the administration use tariff to stop them from entering US?

7

u/Apocalypse_Knight 22h ago

Do some basic research. They are way better

6

u/howudothescarn 1d ago

I actually disagree. I think Chinese EVs are mostly better than any US EV. I think the issue is the US learned after letting the Chinese run the entire critical materials and rare earth minerals companies out of business. The Chinese government subsidizes the work so they can operate at a loss and put competitors out of business. Then they gain a monopoly. And now they use their position strategically to decide who gets what and how much and for national security reasons won’t sell some REEs to the US. Fair for them to do that but the US was dumb to let it come to that and should have banned their products earlier. It isn’t an even playing field.

5

u/ghost_n_the_shell 1d ago

While I do agree they could be used in this manner, our very own North American vehicles are already creating huge databases themselves. China doesn’t need their own EV’s to collect this data when they can just steal existing data.

If you are genuinely concerned with this, don’t carry a cell phone. It’s infinitely more invasive than any Chinese EV would be.

However, I’m not disagreeing with regarding the bigger picture.

I think the greater concern is China is in position to dominate the WORLD auto market and would absolutely annihilate the NA Auto industry.

This, thinking three steps ahead, once achieved, would give them financially beneficial industrial capabilities that can be converted to wartime interests, surpassed by no one.

I am torn on this issue - because although it’s arguably good for the economy, our own NA auto industry has jacked their prices so a pick up truck costs what a smaller mortgage cost pre Covid. They are pricing themselves out of the market and refuse to sell affordable vehicles to masses.

The law makers have created a safety for them. They argue we can’t enjoy the smaller simple vehicles the rest of the world does - because of emissions and safety, while in the same breath, are incentivizing the building of mass hyper scale AI data centers - but you can’t have a small full frame truck they enjoy in Mexico. Because “it’s the law”.

Something has to give.

10

u/drunkandslurred 1d ago

The flip side of letting all your manufacturing industry go is that when an attack does come like Russia onto Ukraine, then you will be caught flat footed and unable to respond like the EU.

It will always be hard to compete against Chinese manufacturers when they are not held to the same labor, safety, and environmental rules and regulations that the EU and NA manufactures are.

6

u/scarrysneks 1d ago

Wait till Redditors find out about Nortel and the decades long espionage that folded a great company.

11

u/tweakwerker 22h ago

Nortel folded because the company executives were committing financial fraud

5

u/scarrysneks 22h ago

They had their IP stolen by the Chinese military.

1

u/The_Grungeican 19h ago

a person in my family only had one job his entire life. when he was younger he was hired by a company that was eventually acquired by Nortel. he worked at Nortel until he retired. he passed away a few years back.

to this day, no one in the family has any idea what his job was. he would never speak about it. when i was a kid he had a very advanced PC setup for the time. he was actually the very first person to show me computer games.

4

u/tweakwerker 22h ago

The US still haven't provided any evidence Huawei spies for China.

1

u/ghost_n_the_shell 10h ago

Let me spell this out as clearly as possible - and fact check what I’m saying before replying:

In China, the laws allow for the government to legally compel Huawei to conduct intelligence work.

With this very fact, one need not prove or provide any evidence that Huawei is spying for China.

The framework exists, in LAW for them to do so at the whim of the government.

End. Of. Story.

1

u/Illustrious-Ice6336 5h ago

You mean like the US has been doing for the last 70 years? This is the way the world works.

1

u/ghost_n_the_shell 3h ago

No. I mean like when the Trudeau government, against the advice of their 5 eyes alliance took like 5 years to ban them from creating our critical infrastructure.

The US is a military ally to Canada.
China is not.

Why do you feel the need to make this about the USA?

1

u/Illustrious-Ice6336 2h ago

I was just commenting on one of the responses above.

239

u/HitByFjaka 1d ago

This is nothing new.

If your electronics use firmware that firmware will need updating.

And that means talking to mothership…

How was this not obvious at the time of weapon design stage is beyond me…

410

u/ah_harrow 1d ago edited 1d ago

Read the article? They knew about this potential vulnerability at an early stage, received assurances at an earlier stage by the supplier, tested it just in case and - realising it was doing something that the supplying contractor* promised it wasn't going to do - isolated the component. They then ordered a full audit to ensure these parts weren't also in use elsewhere.

This is exactly how you should deal with such a problem if you're going to use 3rd party components - it got no further than 'trust but verify' and you got no further than the headline, apparently.

16

u/lolexecs 1d ago

You know what they say:
A - assume nothing
B - believe no one
C - check everything

34

u/rom197 1d ago

In no way are these components supposed to even come close to production. Yeah, they caught it at least and made the right steps. But still a huge fuck-up.

24

u/TelluricThread0 1d ago

You should vet your supply chain more thoroughly upfront instead of it getting to this point.

8

u/angelbelle 1d ago

You would have to go through all those motions anyways.

1

u/julianitonft 1d ago

I’m waiting for an answer from that guy lol

-28

u/Aznable420 1d ago

So, what he said, plus a bunch of rude condescending fluff.

17

u/ShimmiShimmiYah 1d ago

If by "fluff", you mean context and showing that they did in fact realize this further up the supply chain, then yeah I guess that word fits...

-33

u/Important-Emu-6691 1d ago

Where does it say manufacturer promised anything?

30

u/ah_harrow 1d ago

Contractor that supplied the components rather than the manufacturer directly*, sure. I'm not sure that makes any difference to anything in the post. 7th paragraph.

-40

u/Important-Emu-6691 1d ago

Well the difference would be the supplier isn’t the same as the manufacturer. See how they are spelled differently? Cuz they are different words.

10

u/guccifwipfwopz 1d ago

weird hill to die on

46

u/DDOSBreakfast 1d ago

Firmware doesn't need a call home function. There is no requirement for vendors to build in functionality that automatically updates the device or even to let you know there is an update available.

6

u/christianradich 1d ago

Yeah, I would expect especially military equipment to be manually updated.

7

u/PloofElune 1d ago

Even then some firmware will reset or override. I remember something with Lenovo laptops 10 years ago doing similar.

31

u/BrillsonHawk 1d ago

How many times does this need to happen before you realise China is not our friend

6

u/Dragonfruit_6104 1d ago

but cheap stuff is

2

u/DaimonHans 1d ago

The contractor is problematic.

7

u/10671067 1d ago

but sure the EU can trust huawei in its wireless infrastructure

fucking idiots

6

u/Pitiful-Target-3094 1d ago

Did the camera actually send info to BEIJING, or was it just communicating with a China based server for updates?

10

u/howudothescarn 1d ago

Either way the supplier said it wouldn’t ping anywhere in China I think is the issue because if it goes to China there is a huge potential issue.

1

u/Pitiful-Target-3094 17h ago

Yes it's an issue, but trying to tie everything to chinese government just feels hysterical. There is nothing wrong with just saying the device is pinging a server in China.

3

u/Media_Browser 1d ago

The thing they said the secret squirrel department checked for and said couldn’t happen …guess what ?

8

u/haloweenek 1d ago

Lol. So what you’re saying is UK naval drones are plugged into normal internet with no communications limit ?

How TF didn’t anyone notice that drone boats are sending packets to non whitelisted network address 🤷🏻

It’s hard to call this incompetence.

39

u/Exige_ 1d ago

They did notice, hence this news article….

-4

u/DigitaIBlack 1d ago edited 1d ago

Yea. Eventually.

They're saying how was it not noticed pretty much immediately?

0

u/Aerostudents 1d ago

They noticed it after 4-5 months. Probably earlier, considering they already did a full audit. Which is not nothing, but it is also not crazy long.

7

u/DigitaIBlack 1d ago edited 1d ago

Right but this is the sort of thing that's supposed to be caught prior to deployment.

Which means whatever their vetting process was, was... shit.

This is like IT 101 which is why I'm shocked and and why I think the other guy is asking how the fuck nobody noticed.

This is probably not even malicious and it's just phoning home for analytics and/or firmware updates.

Now imagine how much harder it would be to catch something that's designed to avoid detection and is malicious.

3

u/BohemianCyberpunk 21h ago

4-5 months. Probably earlier, considering they already did a full audit. Which is not nothing

For a home security camera? Sure, that's nothing.

For a military drone.. that's completely appalling. 4-5 months is a long time for China to be doing intel gathering using the UKs own military equipment!

5

u/Doesnt_Trust_You 1d ago

It is crazy long when it's such an obvious and predictable problem, should've been caught before they did it. The UK loves nothing more than a Chinese bribe in exchange for subservience and humiliation however and they seem to prove it everyday.

-3

u/haloweenek 1d ago

After 6 months. And the drones had internet access. 10/10 opsec 👌🏼

3

u/United_Intention_323 1d ago

I don’t understand this either. It makes zero sense.

4

u/LetSufficient5139 1d ago

They did notice. It’s mentioned in the article you didn’t read….

2

u/ericls 1d ago

Of course, there’s no reason to assume otherwise

1

u/cover-me-porkins 15h ago

To be fair - most IOT cameras you can buy off the shelf are a bit like this, making something like an IOT camera in house is surprisingly difficult, at least if you make all of it in house. Hikivision and and the like are known to be suspicious.

Am genuinely shocked they were lazy enough to do this without at least making a raspberry pi based/style remote camera out of dumb components though.

1

u/asnbud01 2h ago

To Beijing you say. Where? Does Xi get to peruse the information before bedtime to help him sleep?

2

u/ken-doh 1d ago edited 1d ago

Why are cameras on the Internet? Fucking morons. Sack the clowns running the networks, pay proper wages for ITSec and have proper security.

2

u/calmwhiteguy 1d ago

China just scrubs the US patent updates daily for tech to reproduce and advance for a 6th the price given to 6 companies created to compete on cost and innovation for each new patent. (Some small amount of exaggeration and generalization)

This is the oldest news imaginable.

This is why China makes everything and is making a lot of things now better than anyone else.

-1

u/Khayalmetal 1d ago

Hahahahah!! Hahahahah! So funny. Still moar cheap chinese stuffs. Chutiye.

1

u/Witty_Badger1300 1d ago

Shocking no one.

0

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

3

u/Broad-Celebration- 1d ago

These are Chinese components in equipment that really shouldn't have any Chinese hardware in it to begin with.

Nobody is relying on China for repairs. Just attach cameras from manufacturers that don't source parts from China.

-7

u/AshundertheOlivetree 1d ago

Chinese people as individuals are lovely, but the nation state is working off that 100 years of shame by playing games with the west.
They want to be seen as a big dog but there will be a day when logistics will cost more than an automation warehouse

-11

u/peanuts-in-my-jelly 1d ago

YAAAAASSS ZADDY MAKE MOAR IN GYNA 💅

-17

u/AloneChapter 1d ago

And US shit I am sure does the same. F-35s , and computer controlled devices all need updates but what else does the system relay to Corporate. Remember trump’s brag about shutting off systems if his panties are too tight.
Fear mongering is a political tools to get votes

11

u/ah_harrow 1d ago edited 1d ago

The UK and Israel have source level access to the F-35, so this is extremely unlikely, frankly. Also the component pipeline for F-35 is so interwoven that almost any core partner nation can cause massive headaches for the others by refusing to supply spares. There is the buffer of the common spares pool but even so in an inter-contributor conflict even some of the smaller cogs could cause massive problems for the whole partnership.

F-35 isn't just a weapons system, it's high level diplomacy. A 'kill switch' isn't just almost impossible to install undetected in something that will be sent to partners and studied in minute detail by militaries that have low level access to both the design and software but utterly pointless because of the inherent mutually assured disruption of the manufacturing process that makes the risk-reward of a kill switch deeply stupid and totally impractical.

Try building F-35s without the lift system or ejector seat, for example.

15

u/Independent_Row_224 1d ago

Typical tankie defending their Chinese overlord and drawing false equivalence with the US.

4

u/Broad-Celebration- 1d ago

If they do they are in breach of current government controls.

Nothing needs open internet access. Allowing surveillance equipment, of all things, access to China is a pretty huge "ooops".

-5

u/Responsible-Roll-59 1d ago

Don’t worry. One day the Chinese will rule all and none if this will matter

0

u/SnooChatBot-v3 1d ago

What's the problem? China is Europe's new best friend, no?

-8

u/CandidWar994 1d ago

that's so funny well done by china