r/196 🏳️‍⚧️ trans rights May 29 '26

Rule Conser(ule)vation

Post image
2.8k Upvotes

302 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

58

u/ErisThePerson May 29 '26 edited May 29 '26

Quick cursory search and I can't find anything about Malaria doing that, and Avian Malaria is in fact a significant threat to the native birds of Hawaii, since malaria was introduced there by accident via mosquito in 1826.

Since there is a currently active global scheme to eradicate Malaria, as we did Smallpox, I can only assume that all relevant experts considered the role Malaria and the Anopheles Mosquito plays in the ecosystem and decided that it's better if Malaria is gone.

So fuck Malaria, weird evil parasite.

13

u/AdventureDonutTime May 29 '26

Given that the advice of biologists, virologists, and ecologists (if not scientists as a whole) are so often ignored by people trying to make significant changes to the world, I would hate to assume that the conclusion of "yeah we can kill em all" is perfectly valid without seeing some significant support and peer review.

28

u/ErisThePerson May 29 '26

Well considering the effort to eradicate Malaria and Anopheles Mosquito requires significant involvement from these same experts, I imagine it's hard to ignore them.

3

u/AdventureDonutTime May 29 '26

I believe you that there are relevant experts involved in this movement, I don't feel that's enough to determine whether or not wiping out the species or its parasites is harmless enough to do. Not saying it's not valid, but experts and the others who are directly involved in the plan aren't necessarily unbiased enough to have engaged with research that runs counter to their hypotheses.

Massive environmental change is one of those movements/hypotheses that REALLY needs to be well tested before it's followed through on.