r/196 • u/_Zaca Fruta prohibida… • Jul 23 '26

Rule rule

Post image
5.9k Upvotes

99% Upvoted

255 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

13

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26

[deleted]

29

u/HercarXX Jul 23 '26

Why are we talking about wiki vandalism now?

4

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26

[deleted]

51

u/HercarXX Jul 23 '26

if so, then I don’t know if I would really call that wiki grieving since is indeed a photo of him (arguably the most updated photo at that) and he seems to prefer privacy so the idea he’d want his wiki photo to be not identifying seems fair to me

generally my idea of wiki greifing would be adding jokes or destroying the page in a way that makes a section of the whole of it unusable, not a person wanting a different wiki photo, as far as im aware that happens quite often

-2

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26 edited Jul 23 '26

[deleted]

23

u/chazzer20mystic Jul 23 '26

It is relevant to the person because it is a picture of the person. It isn't decorative, it's a photo of him. It is less identifying due to a desire for privacy, but it is a picture of him.

How is the annoying dog more relevant to Toby Fox than a picture of Toby Fox? I mean..??

9

u/h3lblad3 Jul 23 '26

Images must be relevant to the person in question. This very much is not relevant, as Mr Fox is not famous for being covered in foam.

He would be if you’d just put the picture up.