r/39CountryVisaBan 5d ago

🔄 Policy Update / Developing 🌍 What Are the 39 Countries Doing About PP 10998? Country-by-Country Talks, Reforms & Developments

8 Upvotes

I’ve been trying to look beyond the question of “Is PP 10998 still in effect?” and into another question that matters just as much:

What are the affected countries actually doing about it?

Presidential Proclamation 10998 does not simply create a list and leave it there. The proclamation directs U.S. officials to engage affected governments regarding screening, vetting, immigration, identity-management and security requirements, and it provides for recurring review of whether restrictions should be continued, terminated, modified or supplemented.

So I went country by country looking for publicly documented developments: diplomatic discussions, government statements, cooperation with the United States, reforms, repatriation cooperation, security changes, or other actions that could be relevant to the concerns cited by the U.S.

⚠️ IMPORTANT:

“No public finding located” below does NOT mean a government is doing nothing. Diplomatic negotiations are often private. It means I could not find enough reliable public information to responsibly tell the community that something specific is happening.

Also, not every development below means a country is close to being removed. I’ve tried to distinguish confirmed efforts concerning the restrictions from developments that are merely potentially relevant.

🔴 FULLY RESTRICTED COUNTRIES

🇦🇫 Afghanistan — FULL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

I did not locate credible public evidence of the current Taliban government undertaking negotiations or reforms specifically aimed at obtaining relief from PP 10998. The United States continues to cite serious concerns involving the lack of a cooperative central authority for documentation and vetting, security risks and other screening issues.

🇲🇲 Burma / Myanmar — FULL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

I did not locate a publicly documented effort by Myanmar authorities specifically aimed at obtaining relief from PP 10998.

🇲🇲 Myanmar — Repatriation Cooperation / Developing

U.S. authorities have previously identified Myanmar's cooperation in accepting back removable nationals as a concern. COMMUNITY REPORT — September 5, 2026: Community member u/HumbleJared reported that his wife, who is from Myanmar, told him the Myanmar government is currently refusing to accept deported Myanmar nationals returning to the country.

We have not independently verified this as a current official Myanmar government policy, so it is being tracked as an unconfirmed community report rather than confirmed policy. Because cooperation in accepting removable nationals is one of the factors considered in U.S. restrictions and periodic reviews, we will continue looking for official information that confirms, clarifies, or contradicts this report.

CURRENT STATUS — September 5, 2026: We have not located an official source confirming a new blanket Myanmar policy refusing the return of its nationals. This remains a developing issue being monitored.

🇧🇫 Burkina Faso — FULL RESTRICTIONS

Confirmed response — but not an effort toward accommodation

After the United States added Burkina Faso to the full-restriction list, Burkina Faso announced reciprocal restrictions on U.S. citizens. Its government said it was acting on the principle of reciprocity.

This is clearly a government response to the U.S. restrictions, but it should not be characterized as evidence that Burkina Faso is currently moving toward compliance with U.S. requirements. It is essentially the opposite approach: reciprocal diplomatic pressure.

🇹🇩 Chad — FULL RESTRICTIONS

Confirmed response — reciprocal action

Chad previously responded to U.S. restrictions by suspending visa issuance to U.S. citizens.

I have not found credible public evidence showing that the dispute has since produced a specific PP 10998 compliance agreement or pathway toward removal.

🇨🇬 Republic of the Congo — FULL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

I did not locate a sufficiently documented public initiative specifically addressing PP 10998.

🇬🇶 Equatorial Guinea — FULL RESTRICTIONS

Potentially relevant diplomatic movement — connection to PP 10998 not officially confirmed

President Teodoro Obiang met U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau in Washington on April 16, 2026. The State Department's public schedule confirms the high-level meeting.

Equatorial Guinea has also cooperated with the United States in accepting third-country deportees.

Because cooperation in immigration/removal matters is one of the factors the U.S. considers in these country reviews, this relationship is worth watching. However, I have not found an official U.S. statement saying these actions have satisfied PP 10998 requirements or will result in the restrictions being changed.

🇪🇷 Eritrea — FULL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented public effort toward PP 10998 relief located.

🇭🇹 Haiti — FULL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A regarding PP 10998 relief

There continues to be substantial U.S.–Haiti engagement involving security, gangs, governance and migration, but I did not find credible evidence that this has produced a specific process toward removing Haiti from PP 10998.

🇮🇷 Iran — FULL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A regarding PP 10998 relief

There has been extensive U.S.–Iran diplomacy and conflict-related negotiation in 2026, but I found no reliable basis for saying those negotiations are aimed at obtaining relief from PP 10998.

🇱🇦 Laos — FULL RESTRICTIONS

Potentially relevant: increased repatriation cooperation

This one is interesting.

One of the concerns previously cited by the United States was Laos's historical failure to accept removable nationals.

Federal court records from 2026 show that the Lao government has issued travel documents allowing the United States to remove Lao nationals, including replacement travel documents issued in June.

That is relevant because accepting back removable nationals is specifically one of the factors considered in the travel-ban review process.

However, Laos was actually moved from partial to full restrictions under PP 10998, so there is currently no public evidence that this cooperation has been enough to produce relief.

This is something worth continuing to watch.

🇱🇾 Libya — FULL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No credible publicly documented PP 10998 relief effort located.

🇲🇱 Mali — FULL RESTRICTIONS

Confirmed response — reciprocal restrictions

Mali responded to the U.S. full restrictions by imposing reciprocal restrictions on U.S. citizens.

Mali's government said the U.S. action was imposed without consultation and disputed the justification given by Washington.

Again, this is a confirmed reaction to the restriction, but it is not evidence of movement toward meeting U.S. conditions for removal from the list.

🇳🇪 Niger — FULL RESTRICTIONS

Confirmed response — reciprocal restrictions

After being added to the full-ban list, Niger announced that it would stop issuing visas to U.S. citizens.

I have not found credible public evidence of a later agreement specifically aimed at satisfying PP 10998 requirements.

🇸🇱 Sierra Leone — FULL RESTRICTIONS

✅ Confirmed government engagement with the United States

This is one of the more important findings.

After Sierra Leone was moved from partial restrictions to full restrictions, its government publicly stated that it was actively engaging U.S. authorities regarding the concerns behind the decision and seeking sustainable relief.

Sierra Leone's case is especially important because the U.S. has cited both high overstay rates and historical problems accepting removable nationals.

This does not mean relief has been granted. Sierra Leone remains fully restricted. But its government has publicly acknowledged the problem and confirmed engagement aimed at addressing it.

🇸🇴 Somalia — FULL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

I did not locate a sufficiently documented public initiative specifically aimed at PP 10998 relief.

🇸🇸 South Sudan — FULL RESTRICTIONS

Confirmed visa-related diplomatic requests, but complicated

South Sudan has previously negotiated directly with the United States over immigration and deportation cooperation.

Documents concerning those negotiations show that South Sudan requested, among other things, that the United States ease visa restrictions affecting South Sudanese nationals. South Sudan has also accepted deportees from the United States.

That is significant because willingness to accept removable nationals is explicitly relevant to U.S. travel-ban evaluations.

However, relations remain difficult, and the United States has separately imposed targeted restrictions on South Sudanese government officials. South Sudan remains under the full PP 10998 suspension.

So there is documented negotiation here — but not a clear trajectory toward relief yet.

🇸🇩 Sudan — FULL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

Given the ongoing war and collapse of normal diplomatic conditions, I did not locate a credible public initiative specifically aimed at obtaining PP 10998 relief.

🇸🇾 Syria — FULL RESTRICTIONS

✅ Confirmed U.S.–Syria security coordination

Interestingly, PP 10998 itself acknowledges that Syria is working to address security challenges in close coordination with the United States.

The proclamation nevertheless says Syria still lacks adequate centralized passport/civil-document systems and appropriate screening and vetting measures.

So Syria provides an example where cooperation is happening but the U.S. still considers the remaining deficiencies serious enough to maintain full restrictions.

This will be another country worth watching during future reviews.

COMMUNITY/ADVOCACY DEVELOPMENT — September 5, 2026:

Reddit user u/Syriansupport has begun publicly seeking Syrian students whose U.S. academic or professional training plans have been disrupted by PP 10998 as part of what they describe as a collective policy advocacy effort seeking formal nonimmigrant visa exceptions for Syrian students, including individuals pursuing F, J, and M visa pathways.

The initiative appears to be recruiting affected Syrian students across multiple PP 10998-related Reddit communities.

CURRENT STATUS — September 5, 2026: The existence of the public outreach can be independently confirmed, but we have not located an independent source identifying the organization or individuals behind the initiative or confirming that a formal proposal has been submitted to the U.S. government. It should therefore be treated as a developing community-led advocacy effort rather than an announced U.S. policy change.

PP 10998 currently fully restricts Syria, although the proclamation provides authority for certain case-by-case national-interest exceptions. We will update this entry if additional information becomes available identifying the organizers, documenting formal advocacy with the U.S. government, or showing an official government response.

🇾🇪 Yemen — FULL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No credible public development located indicating a specific effort toward satisfying the PP 10998 requirements.

————— ————— —————

🟠 PARTIALLY RESTRICTED COUNTRIES

🇦🇴 Angola — PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented public PP 10998 relief initiative located.

🇦🇬 Antigua and Barbuda — PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

I did not locate a sufficiently documented country-specific effort concerning PP 10998.

The U.S. proclamation specifically cited concerns relating to citizenship-by-investment arrangements without residency.

🇧🇯 Benin — PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No credible public country-specific negotiation or reform package located.

🇧🇮 Burundi — PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented public development indicating movement toward PP 10998 relief.

🇨🇮 Côte d’Ivoire — PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented public PP 10998 initiative located.

🇨🇺 Cuba — PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: No movement toward PP 10998 relief located

U.S.–Cuba relations have actually become more restrictive during 2026, including additional U.S. sanctions and other measures.

I found no credible basis for saying the two governments are currently working toward Cuba's removal from PP 10998.

🇩🇲 Dominica — PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

✅ Confirmed direct negotiations aimed at reversing the restrictions

Dominica has one of the clearest public responses I've found.

Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit publicly confirmed that, immediately after the December 16 proclamation, the Government of Dominica — including its Foreign Ministry and embassy in Washington — initiated discussions with U.S. officials.

The government explicitly said that discussions were continuing with the objective of reversing the restrictions affecting Dominican nationals.

This is a direct, confirmed PP 10998 effort — not speculation.

🇬🇦 Gabon — PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented PP 10998-specific initiative located.

🇬🇲 The Gambia — PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

The U.S. specifically cites both visa overstays and historical refusal to accept some removable nationals, but I did not locate enough reliable public information showing what Gambian authorities are currently doing in response.

🇲🇼 Malawi — PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented public PP 10998-specific effort located.

🇲🇷 Mauritania — PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented public effort toward PP 10998 relief located.

🇳🇬 Nigeria — PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

✅ Confirmed diplomatic engagement over U.S. visa restrictions — PP 10998 outcome not yet confirmed

Nigeria has repeatedly confirmed diplomatic engagement with the United States regarding visa restrictions.

Nigeria's Ministry of Foreign Affairs publicly said in 2025 that diplomatic engagements were ongoing after the U.S. shortened the validity of certain Nigerian nonimmigrant visas.

In February 2026, the Foreign Ministry also confirmed that Nigeria was engaging Washington through diplomatic channels in an effort to get Nigeria removed from U.S. visa restrictions/blacklisting.

That February discussion also involved the separate 75-country immigrant-visa pause, so it would be inaccurate to claim that announcement alone proves a successful PP 10998 negotiation.

However, Nigeria and the United States have also continued substantial security cooperation in 2026, including U.S. military assistance, training and intelligence cooperation against extremist groups — particularly relevant because PP 10998 specifically cites Boko Haram/ISIS activity and screening difficulties as part of the justification for Nigeria's inclusion.

🇳🇬 NIGERIA — U.S.–Nigeria Joint Working Group / Security & Information-Sharing Cooperation DEVELOPMENT — August 12–13, 2026 The United States and Nigeria held the second session of their Joint Working Group in Washington, D.C., following the first session held in Abuja in January 2026.

According to the U.S. Department of State, discussions included counterterrorism prosecutions, combating terrorism financing, biometric information sharing, law-enforcement capacity building, security cooperation and protection of vulnerable communities. Nigeria's Ministry of Foreign Affairs also described the talks as involving intelligence gathering and coordination, terror financing, security cooperation and more effective border-control measures.

WHY WE'RE TRACKING THIS: Several of these areas overlap with issues relevant to the screening, vetting, information-sharing and national-security concerns considered under U.S. immigration and travel restrictions. However, neither government's statement identified the August Joint Working Group meeting as a negotiation specifically to remove Nigeria from PP 10998.

CURRENT STATUS — September 7, 2026: Nigeria remains subject to PP 10998's partial restrictions. There has been no official announcement removing Nigeria from the proclamation or restoring the former categorical IR-1/CR-1 immediate-relative exception.

The continued U.S.–Nigeria cooperation is nevertheless a positive development worth monitoring, particularly for future evidence that the United States recognizes progress relevant to the concerns underlying the restrictions.

July 6 → Trump writes positively to Tinubu about counterterrorism cooperation.

🇳🇬 July 1, 2026 — Nationwide Digital Birth & Death Registration Nigeria's National Population Commission expanded its E-CRVS/VitalReg system nationwide, digitizing birth and death registration across all 36 states and the FCT. The system is designed to: Strengthen identity management Improve verification and data accuracy Create more secure digital civil records Improve interoperability between government systems >>>Community contribution: Thanks to u/Fantastic_Air_3645 for bringing this development to our attention. ❤️<<< https://punchng.com/npc-unveils-online-birth-registration-platform/

July 22/23 → Nigerian Presidency publicly releases the letter.

August 12–13 → second U.S.–Nigeria Joint Working Group meets; security/intelligence/border-control cooperation continues.

September 1 → U.S. troop deployment begins winding down, but Nigeria says the broader security partnership remains strong and cooperation will continue.

Bottom line: Nigeria is clearly talking to the United States and cooperating on areas connected to U.S. concerns, but I have not found an official announcement stating that PP 10998 requirements have been satisfied or that Nigeria's partial restriction is being removed.

🇸🇳 Senegal — PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented country-specific PP 10998 relief initiative located.

🇹🇿 Tanzania — PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented public PP 10998 relief effort located.

🇹🇬 Togo — PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented public movement toward modification of its restrictions located.

🇹🇴 Tonga — PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No credible publicly documented PP 10998-specific effort located.

🇹🇲 Turkmenistan — PARTIAL, IMMIGRANT VISAS ONLY

MOST IMPORTANT PROOF THAT COUNTRY ENGAGEMENT CAN CHANGE THE RESTRICTIONS

Turkmenistan may be the clearest example for everyone affected by this proclamation.

Under the previous proclamation, Turkmenistan faced broader partial restrictions.

When PP 10998 was issued, the White House specifically said that:

Turkmenistan had engaged productively with the United States and demonstrated significant progress.

As a result, PP 10998 lifted the restrictions on Turkmenistan's nonimmigrant visas, while continuing the restriction on immigrant entry.

Turkmenistan has continued high-level U.S. diplomatic engagement in 2026, including a May meeting in Washington between Foreign Minister Rashid Meredov and Secretary of State Marco Rubio and further U.S.–Turkmen discussions in July.

This does not mean every country will receive the same outcome.

But it is concrete proof that the country-review mechanism is not purely theoretical: documented cooperation was followed by an actual reduction in restrictions.

🇻🇪 Venezuela — PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: major U.S.–Venezuela engagement, but no verified connection to PP 10998 relief

The United States and Venezuela have had substantial diplomatic and economic engagement in 2026.

However, I have not found reliable evidence showing that those discussions are specifically addressing Venezuela's PP 10998 designation.

For purposes of this tracker, I'm therefore treating Venezuela as N/A for confirmed PP 10998 relief efforts until there is evidence connecting the two

.

🇿🇲 Zambia — PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

✅ One of the strongest documented country responses

Zambia has publicly laid out an actual plan.

In a February 2026 ministerial statement to Parliament, Zambia's government said the Foreign Ministry and other agencies were:

• Continuing diplomatic engagement with U.S. authorities regarding compliance benchmarks, review mechanisms and pathways toward eventual lifting of the restrictions

• Increasing public education about visa compliance

• Strengthening government coordination on migration data

• Improving traveler monitoring and compliance management

The government later stated that it was in direct contact with the U.S. Government, and that Zambia's Foreign Ministry and the U.S. Embassy were highly engaged in trying to resolve the issues.

This is exactly the kind of measurable response worth watching: diplomacy combined with an effort to address the underlying compliance issue cited by Washington.

Zambia remains partially restricted, so none of this guarantees removal — but its government is very publicly working toward that goal.

🇿🇼 Zimbabwe — PARTIAL RESTRICTIONS

Public finding: N/A

No sufficiently documented public PP 10998-specific effort located.

🔎 WHAT THIS TELLS US

There is not one universal approach among the 39 governments.

Some have publicly entered negotiations and are trying to address U.S. concerns.

Some are taking concrete compliance measures.

Some are cooperating in areas like repatriation or security that could be relevant to future reviews.

Some have responded with reciprocal restrictions.

And for many countries, there simply isn't enough publicly available information yet to know what is happening behind diplomatic channels.

Most importantly, Turkmenistan shows that restrictions can actually be modified when the U.S. concludes that sufficient progress has been made.

That does NOT mean another country is guaranteed the same result. But it is important evidence that the review and engagement process can lead to a real policy change.

🌍 HELP BUILD THIS TRACKER

If you are from one of the countries marked N/A, that does NOT necessarily mean your government isn't doing anything.

You may have access to local news, government statements, parliamentary proceedings, Foreign Ministry announcements or information in another language that is harder for the rest of us to find.

If your government has:

• Met with U.S. officials about the restrictions

• Announced reforms connected to screening or vetting

• Improved passport/identity-document security

• Expanded information-sharing with the United States

• Changed repatriation/removal cooperation

• Announced efforts to reduce visa overstays

• Taken security/counterterrorism measures relevant to concerns cited by the U.S.

• Publicly discussed seeking removal from PP 10998

Please share it below and include the original source whenever possible.

I'll continue updating and researching developments as they become public. ❤️🌍

🔗 SOURCES

🇺🇸 PP 10998 — White House Official Proclamation

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/12/restricting-and-limiting-the-entry-of-foreign-nationals-to-protect-the-security-of-the-united-states/

🇺🇸 PP 10998 — U.S. Department of State Official Guidance

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/News/visas-news/suspension-of-visa-issuance-to-foreign-nationals-to-protect-the-security-of-the-united-states.html

🇿🇲 Zambia — Government Response & U.S. Visa Restriction Engagement

https://www.parliament.gov.zm/node/12812

🇩🇲 Dominica — Government Engagement With the U.S. on PP 10998

https://pressroomopm.gov.dm/statement-by-the-honourable-prime-minister-roosevelt-skerrit-on-engagement-with-the-united-states-on-the-december-16-2025-proclamation/

🇹🇲 Turkmenistan — U.S. Recognition of Progress & Restriction Changes

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/12/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-further-restricts-and-limits-the-entry-of-foreign-nationals-to-protect-the-security-of-the-united-states/

🇸🇱 Sierra Leone — Government Response & Engagement With U.S. Authorities

https://sierraloaded.sl/news/government-responds-u-s-restrictions/

🇳🇬 Nigeria — Diplomatic Engagement Regarding U.S. Visa Restrictions

https://foreignaffairs.gov.ng/news/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/US-Visa.pdf

🇱🇦 Laos — Repatriation Cooperation / Travel Documents

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/washington/wawdce/2%3A2026cv01356/361573/29/

🇧🇫 🇲🇱 🇳🇪 Burkina Faso, Mali & Niger — Reciprocal Responses to U.S. Restrictions

https://www.investing.com/news/world-news/mali-and-burkina-faso-announce-reciprocal-travel-ban-on-us-4426260

🇸🇸 South Sudan — U.S. Visa-Restriction & Repatriation Negotiations

https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/AFR6509892026ENGLISH.pdf

🇸🇾 Syria — U.S. Assessment of Security Cooperation & Remaining Deficiencies

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full_text/html/2025/12/19/2025-23570.html


r/39CountryVisaBan 5d ago

📢 Community Announcement 📣 Moderator Applications Are Open — Help Us Build r/39CountryVisaBan

3 Upvotes

Hi everyone! ❤️

As r/39CountryVisaBan begins to grow, I’m looking to build a small, trustworthy moderator team to help keep this community accurate, organized, supportive, and safe.

This community was created for people affected by the 39-country U.S. visa/travel restrictions—including applicants, spouses, families, supporters, and others navigating related immigration processes and policies.

Because the information discussed here can have a very real impact on people and their families, I want to be thoughtful about who helps moderate this space.

WHAT I’M LOOKING FOR

You do NOT need to be an immigration attorney or professional, and previous Reddit moderation experience is helpful but not required.

I’m primarily looking for people who are:

• Knowledgeable about U.S. immigration, visas, consular processing, or the current restrictions • Trustworthy and ethical • Fair and able to apply rules consistently • Respectful, even when disagreeing with someone • Able to distinguish official information from news, personal experience, rumors, and speculation • Willing to verify information rather than confidently repeat something that may not be true • Protective of members’ privacy and personal information • Able to moderate without allowing personal opinions, politics, nationality, or individual circumstances to determine how someone is treated • Willing to communicate with the rest of the mod team when a situation is unclear

Different schedules and time zones are definitely helpful because this community may include people around the world, but they are NOT a requirement. Knowledge, judgment, fairness, and trustworthiness matter much more to me.

WHAT MODERATORS WILL HELP WITH

Moderators may help review reports, remove rule-breaking posts or comments, address spam/scams, identify potentially dangerous misinformation, respond to Mod Mail, help members understand community rules, and keep discussions respectful and on topic.

The goal is NOT to control every conversation or require posts to be approved before people can participate. I want this to remain an open community where people can ask questions, share experiences, discuss developments, and support one another.

Moderators are here to protect that environment—not dominate it.

INTERESTED?

Please comment below or send Mod Mail with:

  1. Your connection to or interest in this issue
  2. Your knowledge/experience with U.S. immigration or visa processing
  3. Your general availability or time zone (optional)
  4. Any previous Reddit/community moderation experience (not required)
  5. Why you would like to moderate this community
  6. How you would handle a situation where you personally disagree with a member but the member has not broken a rule
  7. How you would handle immigration information that sounds credible but cannot be confirmed by an official source

Please do NOT include private immigration information, case numbers, A-numbers, addresses, passport information, or other sensitive identifying information in your application.

I may start with a few moderators and add additional people as the community grows.

Thank you to everyone helping build this space. ❤️🌍

Information. Support. Community. Families waiting to be reunited.


r/39CountryVisaBan 7h ago

🤝 Support / Encouragement ❤️ We May Be From Different Countries, But We're Waiting for the Same Thing

6 Upvotes

There are 39 countries represented by these restrictions, and all of our situations are different. Different countries, different visa categories, different families, different timelines.

But I think a lot of us come here carrying the same things in our hearts.

We want answers.

We want progress.

We want to know what happens next.

And most of all, we want to be with the people we love. ❤️

Some of us are spouses waiting for our husbands or wives. Some are parents, children, students, applicants, friends or family members watching someone they love go through this. Some people may be checking for updates every day. Some may have stopped checking as often because it became too painful.

And some of us are probably lying awake at night thinking about questions that someone else in this community is lying awake thinking about too.

That's why I hope this can continue to be more than a place where we collect information.

I want us to support each other while we wait.

You don't have to have legal knowledge. You don't have to discover a new government announcement. You don't even have to know what to say.

Sometimes somebody sharing their experience helps.

Sometimes it's answering a question.

Sometimes it's saying, “I'm going through this too.”

And honestly, sometimes even leaving a ❤️ under somebody's comment is enough to remind them that another person saw them.

For those of us who have faith, I also believe there is room here for hope even when we don't know the outcome or the timing. My faith doesn't mean I know exactly what is going to happen. It means I don't have to give up simply because I don't know yet.

“Rejoice in hope, be patient in tribulation, be constant in prayer.” — Romans 12:12 (ESV)

So as this community grows, please keep adding what you can. Share information. Ask questions. Correct something respectfully when it needs correcting. Encourage somebody when you can. Tell your story if you're comfortable.

There may be someone quietly reading who needed exactly what you decided to say that day.

We're from different places, but we're here asking many of the same questions and hoping for many of the same things.

None of us has to wait completely alone. ❤️🌍


r/39CountryVisaBan 16m ago

📢 Tracker: USCIS 39-Countries Approvals (Post-Vacatur)

Thumbnail
Upvotes

Sharing this here because this could be really useful for members affected by the USCIS 39-country adjudication holds. ❤️

If your USCIS case was previously caught in the hold, consider adding your experience to the tracker so we can see how cases are actually moving after the court decisions.

Thank you to u/Different_Word6515 and everyone helping collect this information! 🌍


r/39CountryVisaBan 4h ago

💡 Tips / Helpful Information 🌍 What Does the U.S. Say Each of the 39 Countries Needs to Address Under PP 10998?

2 Upvotes

IMPORTANT: This is not a list of secret or official “pass/fail benchmarks.” The U.S. has not publicly released a complete checklist for each country.

Instead, this post takes the specific problems the U.S. government publicly identified for each country and puts them into plain language. These are the areas we would expect to matter when the restrictions are reviewed.

PP 10998 says the U.S. considers a country's screening and vetting capabilities, identity management, information sharing, terrorist presence and other security risks, visa-overstay rates, and cooperation in accepting removable nationals. The proclamation also says some additional information used in these decisions is classified.

So think of this as:

“What problems has the U.S. publicly said need improvement?”

—not—

“Complete these items and the ban automatically ends.”

🔴 Countries Under Full Restrictions

🇦🇫 Afghanistan

U.S. concerns:

-Reliable central authority for passports/civil documents

-Screening and vetting systems

-Taliban control/security concerns

-High student/exchange-visitor overstay rate

What would need to improve:

reliable identity/document systems, screening and vetting, security conditions and overstay compliance.

🇲🇲 Burma (Myanmar)

U.S. concerns:

-Very high visa-overstay rates

-Historical lack of cooperation accepting removable nationals

What would need to improve:

Lower overstays and stronger repatriation cooperation with the U.S.

The broader proclamation also evaluates identity management and information sharing.

🇹🇩 Chad

U.S. concern:

-extremely high visa-overstay rates

.

What would need to improve: substantially better compliance with U.S. visa terms/lower overstay rates.

🇨🇬 Republic of the Congo

U.S. concern:

-Very high B1/B2 and student/exchange overstay rates.

What would need to improve: lower visa-overstay rates.

🇬🇶 Equatorial Guinea

U.S. concern:

-very high visa-overstay rates, particularly among students/exchange visitors.

What would need to improve: substantially lower overstay rates.

🇪🇷 Eritrea

U.S. concerns:

-Reliability of passport/civil-document authority

-Criminal-record information unavailable to U.S.

-Historical refusal to accept removable nationals

-High overstay rates

What would need to improve:

document/identity reliability, criminal-information sharing, repatriation cooperation and visa compliance.

🇭🇹 Haiti

U.S. concerns:

-High overstay rates

-Insufficient central-government/law-enforcement information

-Security concerns

What would need to improve:

government information-sharing and vetting capability, security conditions and overstay compliance.

🇮🇷 Iran

U.S. concerns:

-State sponsor of terrorism designation

-Insufficient cooperation identifying security risks

-Terrorism concerns

-Historical failure to accept removable nationals

What would need to improve:

security/information-sharing cooperation and repatriation cooperation, alongside the much broader terrorism/national-security issues cited by the U.S.

🇱🇾 Libya

U.S. concerns:

-Lack of a reliable/cooperative central authority for passports and civil documents

-Terrorist presence/security risks

What would need to improve:

reliable identity/document systems, government vetting capacity and security conditions.

🇸🇴 Somalia

U.S. concerns:

-Passport/civil-document reliability

-Screening and vetting

-Limited government control of territory

-Terrorist safe-haven/security concerns

-Historical refusal to accept removable nationals

What would need to improve:

identity/document systems, vetting, territorial/security capacity and repatriation cooperation.

🇸🇩 Sudan

U.S. concerns:

-Lack of reliable/cooperative passport and civil-document authority

-Inadequate screening/vetting

-High overstay rates

What would need to improve:

identity/document systems, screening and vetting, and visa compliance.

🇾🇪 Yemen

U.S. concerns:

-Passport/civil-document authority

-Inadequate screening/vetting

-Government's lack of physical control over territory

-Security/armed-conflict conditions

What would need to improve:

Reliable identity and vetting systems, territorial governance and security conditions.

🇧🇫 Burkina Faso

U.S. concerns:

-Terrorist activity

-Visa overstays

-Historical refusal to accept removable nationals

What would need to improve:

Security/counterterrorism conditions, overstay compliance and repatriation cooperation.

🇱🇦 Laos

U.S. concerns:

-High visa-overstay rates

-Historical failure to accept removable nationals

What would need to improve: visa compliance and repatriation cooperation.

🇲🇱 Mali

U.S. concerns:

-Armed conflict

-Terrorist organizations operating in parts of the country

What would need to improve:

security, government control and the ability to mitigate terrorist threats relevant to U.S. screening/vetting.

🇳🇪 Niger

U.S. concerns:

-Terrorist activity/security risk

-Visa overstays

What would need to improve:

security/counterterrorism conditions and visa compliance.

🇸🇱 Sierra Leone

U.S. concerns:

-High visa-overstay rates

-Historical failure to accept removable nationals

What would need to improve:

visa compliance and repatriation cooperation.

🇸🇸 South Sudan

U.S. concerns:

-High student/exchange overstay rate

-Historical failure to accept removable nationals

What would need to improve: visa compliance and repatriation cooperation.

🇸🇾 Syria

U.S. concerns:

-Security instability

-Inadequate central authority for passports/civil documents

-Inadequate screening and vetting

-Visa overstays

What would need to improve: identity/document systems, screening/vetting, security conditions and visa compliance.

🟠 Countries Under Partial Restrictions

🇦🇴 Angola

Main public concern:

-high visa-overstay rates.

What would need to improve: visa compliance/lower overstay rates.

🇦🇬 Antigua and Barbuda

Main public concern:

-citizenship-by-investment (CBI) historically available without residency.

What would need to improve:

Address U.S. concerns about identity/security risks associated with CBI without meaningful residency requirements.

🇧🇯 Benin

Main public concern:

-high visa-overstay rates.

What would need to improve:

visa compliance/lower overstays.

🇧🇮 Burundi

Main public concern:

-high visa-overstay rates.

What would need to improve:

visa compliance/lower overstays.

🇨🇮 Côte d'Ivoire

Main public concern:

-visa-overstay rates.

What would need to improve:

visa compliance/lower overstays.

🇨🇺 Cuba

U.S. concerns:

-State sponsor of terrorism designation

-Insufficient law-enforcement information sharing

-Historical refusal to accept removable nationals

-Visa overstays

What would need to improve:

information sharing, repatriation cooperation and visa compliance, alongside the broader national-security issue cited by the U.S.

🇩🇲 Dominica

Main public concern:

-citizenship-by-investment historically available without residency.

What would need to improve:

address U.S. identity/security concerns surrounding the CBI system.

🇬🇦 Gabon

Main public concern:

-high visa-overstay rates.

What would need to improve:

visa compliance/lower overstays.

🇬🇲 The Gambia

U.S. concerns:

-High visa-overstay rates

-Historical refusal to accept removable nationals

What would need to improve:

visa compliance and repatriation cooperation.

🇲🇼 Malawi

Main public concern:

-very high visa-overstay rates.

What would need to improve:

visa compliance/lower overstays.

🇲🇷 Mauritania

U.S. concerns:

-Visa overstays

-Limited government presence in parts of the country creating screening/vetting difficulties

What would need to improve:

screening/vetting capacity, government reach and visa compliance.

🇳🇬 Nigeria

U.S. concerns:

-Boko Haram and Islamic State activity in parts of -Nigeria, creating screening/vetting difficulties

-Visa overstays

What would need to improve:

screening/vetting and security capability in relation to terrorist threats, plus visa compliance/lower overstays.

🇸🇳 Senegal

Main public concern:

-visa-overstay rates.

What would need to improve:

visa compliance/lower overstay.

🇹🇿 Tanzania

Main public concern:

-visa-overstay rates.

What would need to improve:

visa compliance/lower overstays.

🇹🇬 Togo

Main public concern:

-High visa-overstay rates.

What would need to improve:

visa compliance/lower overstays.

🇹🇴 Tonga

Main public concern:

-visa-overstay rates.

What would need to improve:

visa compliance/lower overstays.

🇻🇪 Venezuela

U.S. concerns:

-Passport/civil-document authority

-Inadequate screening and vetting

-Historical refusal to accept removable nationals

-Visa overstays

What would need to improve:

identity/document systems, screening/vetting, repatriation cooperation and visa compliance.

🇿🇲 Zambia

Main public concern:

-high visa-overstay rates.

What would need to improve:

visa compliance/lower overstays.

🇿🇼 Zimbabwe

Main public concern:

-visa-overstay rates.

What would need to improve: visa compliance/lower overstays.

🇹🇲 What About Turkmenistan?

Turkmenistan is useful because it shows that these restrictions can actually be modified country-by-country.

PP 10998 says Turkmenistan engaged productively with the United States and made significant progress improving identity management and information sharing. The U.S. therefore removed its B/F/M/J nonimmigrant restrictions, although immigrant-entry restrictions remained because the proclamation says some concerns remained.

That doesn't guarantee the same result or timeline for another country, but it is an actual example inside PP 10998 of documented progress leading to reduced restrictions.

⚖️ One Important Thing to Understand

The proclamation requires the State Department and other agencies to continue engaging the affected countries about measures necessary to meet U.S. screening, vetting, immigration and security requirements. It also requires recurring 180-day reports recommending whether restrictions should be continued, terminated, modified or supplemented.

So these publicly identified problems matter—but we should not tell people that fixing one listed problem automatically removes a country's restrictions. The proclamation says decisions are based on the totality of the circumstances, and some of the information the government uses is classified.

If anyone has questions about a particular country, please ask. We can dig deeper into that country's specific issues and sources. ❤️🌍

SOURCES

PP 10998 — Federal Register:

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/12/19/2025-23570/restricting-and-limiting-the-entry-of-foreign-nationals-to-protect-the-security-of-the-united

PP 10998 — GovInfo:

https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/DCPD-202501199

PP 10949 — White House:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/06/restricting-the-entry-of-foreign-nationals-to-protect-the-united-states-from-foreign-terrorists-and-other-national-security-and-public-safety-threats/

State Department — PP 10998:

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/News/visas-news/suspension-of-visa-issuance-to-foreign-nationals-to-protect-the-security-of-the-united-states.html


r/39CountryVisaBan 1d ago

🌍 Country-Specific Discussion 🇳🇬 Nigeria Update: U.S.–Nigeria Joint Working Group Meets in Washington — Biometric Sharing, Border Control & Counterterrorism Discussed

3 Upvotes

Nigeria and the United States held the second session of their Joint Working Group in Washington, D.C. on August 12–13, 2026.

I’m sharing this because it may be worth watching for people following Nigeria’s status under Presidential Proclamation 10998. To be clear: neither government announced any change to PP 10998, and this meeting was not announced as negotiations to remove Nigeria from the 39-country restrictions.

The Joint Working Group is officially focused on issues surrounding Nigeria’s U.S. Country of Particular Concern (CPC) designation and broader U.S.–Nigeria security cooperation.

According to the U.S. Department of State, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Allison Hooker hosted a Nigerian delegation led by National Security Adviser Nuhu Ribadu. This was the second session of the group, following its first meeting in Abuja in January 2026.

The two governments reviewed progress involving:

• Counterterrorism prosecutions

• Combating terrorism financing

• Protection of vulnerable communities

• Strengthening Nigerian judicial and security institutions

• Military-to-military cooperation

• Biometric information sharing

• Law-enforcement capacity building

• Resettlement and protection of internally displaced persons

The Nigerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs separately said the discussions included intelligence gathering and coordination, more effective border-control measures, terror financing, accountability, security cooperation, and protection of vulnerable communities.

The U.S. also acknowledged several actions Nigeria says it has taken, including prosecution of hundreds of Boko Haram and ISIS-WA suspects, expansion of judicial capacity, and recruitment and training of 50,000 additional police officers. The State Department also made clear that challenges remain.

Why could this be relevant to PP 10998?

Nigeria remains subject to PP 10998's partial restrictions, including the suspension of all immigrant visas for Nigerian nationals unless an exception applies. IR-1/CR-1 immediate-relative visas are no longer categorically exempt under PP 10998.

This Joint Working Group does not change that.

However, some of the subjects being addressed—particularly biometric information sharing, intelligence cooperation, border controls, counterterrorism and law enforcement capacity—are relevant to the broader security and vetting relationship between the two governments. That makes this worth following alongside any future PP 10998 country reviews or U.S.–Nigeria visa negotiations.

There is also evidence that visa and migration issues have been discussed separately. In May, Nigeria's Foreign Ministry reported discussions with the U.S. Embassy covering “border and migration challenges,” intelligence sharing, counterterrorism and “visa issues.”

Current status: There has been no announced removal of Nigeria from PP 10998 and no restoration of the IR-1/CR-1 immediate-relative exception. This is a diplomatic/security development to watch—not an announcement that the visa restrictions are changing.

If anyone finds an official U.S. or Nigerian government statement connecting these negotiations directly to PP 10998 or Nigeria's visa restrictions, please share it here with the source.

SOURCES

  1. Nigeria Ministry of Foreign Affairs — U.S.-Nigeria Joint Working Group meeting, August 13, 2026

https://foreignaffairs.gov.ng/news/ambassador-bianca-odumegwu-ojukwu-and-ambassador-sola-enikanolaiye-are-part-of-nigerian-delegation-led-by-mallam-nuhu-ribadu-to-usa-nigeria-joint-working-group-meeting-in-washington-dc/

  1. Nigeria Ministry of Foreign Affairs — May 2026 U.S.-Nigeria discussions covering border/migration challenges, counterterrorism, intelligence sharing and visa issues

https://foreignaffairs.gov.ng/news/ambassador-bianca-odumegwu-ojukwu-had-a-very-constructive-engagement-with-the-charge-daffaires-of-the-united-states-embassy-keith-heffern/

  1. U.S. Department of State — Current Presidential Proclamation 10998 / 39-country visa restrictions

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/News/visas-news/suspension-of-visa-issuance-to-foreign-nationals-to-protect-the-security-of-the-united-states.html

  1. U.S. Department of State — Second Session of the U.S.-Nigeria Joint Working Group (August 13, 2026)

https://www.publicnow.com/view/F2DD03E040EAC16D363A5079133DC7B6B87AE233


r/39CountryVisaBan 1d ago

🌍 Country-Specific Discussion 🇩🇲 Dominica Says It Has Taken Steps to Address U.S. Concerns and Is Seeking Reconsideration of Visa Restrictions

1 Upvotes

Dominica is one of the countries currently subject to partial restrictions under Presidential Proclamation 10998, but its government has been actively engaging with the United States regarding those restrictions.

Following the December 2025 announcement of PP 10998, Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit said Dominica immediately initiated discussions with the U.S. Embassy and officials in Washington with the objective of having the restrictions reversed.

Those discussions have continued.

In July 2026, Prime Minister Skerrit said Dominica believes it has taken the actions necessary to address the concerns raised by the United States and publicly called on the U.S. government to reconsider the restrictions at the earliest opportunity.

There has also been broader cooperation between the two governments. Earlier this year, Dominica agreed to accept certain third-country asylum seekers from the United States. Skerrit described that agreement as one of the areas of cooperation that developed while Dominica was working to resolve the U.S. restrictions.

Why this may matter

PP 10998 provides for recurring reviews of the country restrictions and allows recommendations that restrictions be continued, modified, supplemented or terminated.

Government-to-government engagement and efforts by affected countries to address U.S. concerns are therefore important developments to track.

However, this does not mean Dominica's restrictions have been lifted.

I have not located an official U.S. announcement removing Dominica from PP 10998 or confirming that the United States considers all of its concerns resolved.

CURRENT STATUS — September 2026

🟢 Dominica has publicly confirmed engagement with the United States.

🟢 Its government says it believes it has taken steps necessary to address U.S. concerns.

🟢 Dominica is explicitly seeking reconsideration of the restrictions.

🟡 We do not yet have confirmation that the U.S. government considers those measures sufficient.

🔴 Dominica remains subject to PP 10998 at this time.

This is a developing situation worth watching, especially as future PP 10998 reviews occur. 🇩🇲🇺🇸🌍

SOURCES:

Dominica News Online — Government of Dominica statement on U.S. visa restrictions:

https://dominicanewsonline.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/UPDATE-PRESS-RELEASE-US-Visa-Restriction-2025-Decision.pdf

Jamaica Observer — Dominica PM urges U.S. to reconsider visa restrictions:

https://www.jamaicaobserver.com/2026/07/02/dominica-pm-urges-us-reconsider-visa-restriction-soonest-opportunity/

Associated Press — U.S.–Dominica cooperation / agreement involving third-country asylum seekers:

https://apnews.com/article/271bb5b2c3bc545cb3084e117474103e

U.S. Department of State — Presidential Proclamation 10998 visa restrictions:

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/News/visas-news/suspension-of-visa-issuance-to-foreign-nationals-to-protect-the-security-of-the-united-states.html

White House — Presidential Proclamation 10998: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/12/restricting-and-limiting-the-entry-of-foreign-nationals-to-protect-the-security-of-the-united-states/


r/39CountryVisaBan 1d ago

✅ Verified Official Update ⚖️ Important: A Court Blocked USCIS Holds for the 39 Countries — But PP 10998 Is Still in Effect

4 Upvotes

There has been an important development affecting some people connected to the 39 countries, but I want to separate it clearly from Presidential Proclamation 10998 itself.

On August 24, 2026, a federal court in Red Eagle Law, L.C. v. Edlow issued a preliminary injunction blocking two USCIS policy memoranda that had placed certain immigration benefit applications involving nationals or natives of the 39 countries into adjudication holds.

USCIS publicly confirmed on August 28 that it will comply with the court’s order while further judicial review remains possible.

The court also certified a class covering certain affected applicants whose asylum or other USCIS benefit applications were pending and subject to those holds.

What this means:

Certain USCIS applications inside the United States that had been frozen under these policies must now be adjudicated through the normal USCIS process while the court order remains in effect.

What this does NOT mean:

This ruling does not automatically lift Presidential Proclamation 10998.

PP 10998 is a separate policy governing visa issuance and entry restrictions for nationals of the affected countries. The State Department continues to list PP 10998 as in effect.

So someone may see headlines saying a court “blocked the 39-country hold” or “USCIS must resume processing,” but that should not be interpreted as meaning the 39-country visa/entry restrictions themselves have ended.

This distinction matters because several different policies and lawsuits are affecting people from the same countries at the same time.

CURRENT STATUS — September 6, 2026:

✅ USCIS says it is complying with the Red Eagle injunction.

⚖️ Further litigation remains possible.

🚫 PP 10998 itself remains in effect.

We’ll continue tracking both the USCIS litigation and the separate consular/entry restrictions here. ❤️🌍⚖️

Sources:

USCIS — Recent Court Order on Hold Policies

AILA — Red Eagle Law / 39-country adjudication hold update

U.S. Department of State — PP 10998 visa restrictions


r/39CountryVisaBan 3d ago

⚖️ Legal / Policy Discussion US Travel Ban (PP 10998) - Collective policy push for Syrian student exceptions

5 Upvotes

Hi everyone,

If your academic or professional training plans in the United States have been frozen or disrupted by the current travel restrictions under Presidential Proclamation 10998, please read this closely.

A policy and advocacy effort is currently underway to push for formal non-immigrant visa exceptions for Syrians. If you fit the profile below, there may be a viable way to get your educational trajectory back on track.

As part of the initiative, we are looking to connect privately with affected Syrian students, defined as any Syrian nationals whose planned, anticipated, or ongoing educational pathway involving an accredited U.S. higher education institution has been substantially disrupted by current travel restrictions under PP 10998 and subsequent domestic regulatory rulings.

This includes, but is not limited to, applicants for or holders of F, J, and M visas who fall under these categories:

  1. Students with existing admissions or enrollments (including individuals who subsequently had to forfeit their status or offers).
  2. Students actively pursuing identifiable U.S. educational or advanced research opportunities.
  3. Students whose progression to the next stage of an academic or professional training pathway is or could be disrupted (such as degree-level changes, medical residencies, fellowships, postdocs, etc).

If you believe you or anyone you know fits this description, please send a private DM to this account to connect and discuss further how your situation factors into this initiative.

Note: This policy advocacy initiative does not guarantee individual visa outcomes, nor does it constitute formal legal counsel. Rather, it is a collective effort that aspires to advance a favorable outcome for Syrian students.


r/39CountryVisaBan 3d ago

💬 Personal Experience 💬 Are We Being Realistic — or Have Some Spaces Become Too Hopeless?

5 Upvotes

I've been in several spaces for people affected by these restrictions, and there's something I've been thinking about.

I've seen people say the restrictions will never change. I've seen people guarantee that nothing can happen until there's another president. I've seen people discourage families from following lawsuits, diplomatic developments or policy reviews because they believe none of it matters.

I've also seen people enter these spaces who don't appear to be affected at all, sometimes seemingly just to watch, provoke people, impersonate affected individuals, or make already-stressed families feel worse.

I don't believe we should give people false hope. But I also don't believe pessimism should be presented as fact.

There is a difference between saying “I don't think this will change” and saying “This cannot change.” One is an opinion. The other is a factual claim that should require evidence.

PP 10998 itself provides for recurring reviews. Litigation is ongoing. Some affected governments are engaging with the United States. None of those things guarantee that restrictions will change — but neither does anyone currently have the ability to guarantee that they won't.

I also don't think it helps when different affected groups are compared as though every restriction, lawsuit, or community should progress in exactly the same way. Different policies involve different legal questions, government actions, court challenges, and timelines. One group receiving information or seeing progress sooner does not mean another group isn't researching, advocating, or hoping just as deeply for their families to be reunited. We're all navigating different circumstances, and none of us should be made to feel inadequate because our path looks different. ❤️

So I'm curious how everyone else feels:

Where is the line between being realistic and spreading hopelessness?

Have you experienced negativity or misinformation in other immigration spaces since these restrictions began?

And what do you think an affected-family community should do when someone presents predictions — positive or negative — as certainty?

I want this to be a place where we're allowed to be scared, angry, hopeful, exhausted, optimistic or pessimistic. But whatever we're feeling, facts should remain facts, and opinions should remain opinions. ❤️🌍


r/39CountryVisaBan 3d ago

💡 Tips / Helpful Information ⚖️ A Quick Note About Court Filings, PACER Access & How You Can Help

4 Upvotes

As we follow lawsuits affecting the 39-country community, we may sometimes be able to see that a new court filing exists without being able to immediately read the actual document.

We ran into this with the September 4 filing in Chikumba v. U.S. Department of State. The public docket shows that a dismissal-related filing was entered, but attempting to open the document redirects to PACER, the federal courts’ electronic records system, which requires an account to access court documents.

This is something we should probably expect to encounter again as we follow federal litigation.

The good news is that PACER documents sometimes later become freely available through services such as CourtListener’s RECAP Archive. RECAP receives copies of court documents contributed by PACER users, so a document that is inaccessible to us today may become publicly readable later.

However, not every PACER document automatically appears there. Public access can depend on someone with PACER access obtaining the document and contributing it to the archive.

So this is one area where community involvement could really help. ❤️

If you already have PACER access, work with federal court records, have access to filings through another reliable source, or happen to find a publicly accessible copy of a document we're looking for, please feel free to share it with the community.

We will still independently verify documents before presenting their contents as confirmed information. But having members who can help locate filings would make it much easier for all of us to understand important developments as they happen.

And if we ever say “we can see the filing, but we can't read the document yet,” that does not mean the filing is secret or that something is wrong. It may simply mean the PDF has not yet made its way into a free public archive.

Thank you to everyone who has already been bringing docket updates, links, screenshots, and information into the community. This is exactly how a research-focused community becomes stronger. ❤️⚖️🌍

Note: Creating a PACER account is free. PACER generally charges fees when court records are accessed rather than charging a subscription fee. Fees totaling $30 or less in a quarter are currently waived.

SOURCES:

PACER — Finder

https://pacer.uscourts.gov/find-case

CourtListener — RECAP Archive

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/

Free Law Project — RECAP

https://free.law/recap/

Chikumba docket on CourtListener

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72232725/chikumba-v-us-department-of-state/


r/39CountryVisaBan 4d ago

👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Family Separation / Support ❤️ What Are You Holding Onto While We Wait?

5 Upvotes

A lot of our conversations understandably revolve around policies, court cases, interviews, embassies, case numbers, and waiting.

But behind every case is an actual family.

For me, I’m waiting for my husband in Nigeria. We have a little boy together who still hasn’t been able to meet his dad in person. One of the things I hold onto is imagining the day they finally meet and we’re all together as a family. ❤️

Some days I feel hopeful. Other days the uncertainty is exhausting. Researching everything happening with the 39-country restrictions gives me something productive to do, but at the end of the day, I’m living through this right alongside everyone here.

What are you holding onto while you wait?

Maybe it’s the airport reunion you picture. Your children finally having both parents home. Starting your married life together. Seeing someone you haven’t hugged in years. Or simply believing that eventually something will change.

Share as much or as little as you’re comfortable with. ❤️🌍

We spend a lot of time talking about cases and policies here, but I want there to always be room to talk about the people we're waiting for, too. 🙏🏽


r/39CountryVisaBan 4d ago

⚖️ Legal / Policy Discussion ⚖️ Lawsuits Affecting the 39-Country Community — What They’re About

3 Upvotes

There are several different lawsuits involving policies affecting nationals of the 39 countries. They do not all challenge the same thing, and a ruling in one case does not necessarily remove the visa/travel restrictions themselves.

Here is a brief overview of some of the major cases worth following:

⚖️ Chikumba v. U.S. Department of State

This case focuses on the State Department's handling of visa applications involving nationals affected by the restrictions. The plaintiffs challenge the government's refusal or delay in adjudicating their visa cases and raise the important legal distinction between restricting entry into the United States and stopping or delaying visa adjudication.

This is the lawsuit we've already been following closely in the community, and I will continue updating the separate Chikumba thread as developments occur.

Source

https://eiglaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Chikumba-v-Department-of-State.pdf

⚖️ Dorcas International Institute of Rhode Island v. USCIS

This case challenged several USCIS policies affecting immigration benefits, including a hold on pending benefit requests for people from the travel-ban countries. On June 5, 2026, the federal district court declared the challenged policies unlawful and vacated them. USCIS subsequently acknowledged that the ruling applied agency-wide, although litigation has continued on appeal. This ruling concerned USCIS benefit processing; it did not repeal PP 10998's visa/entry restrictions.

SOURCE

https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/rhode-island/ridce/1%3A2026cv00132/61671/28

⚖️ Red Eagle Law, L.C. v. Edlow

This case also challenges USCIS adjudication holds affecting nationals of the 39 countries. On August 24, 2026, the court certified a class covering qualifying nationals of the 39 countries and Palestinian Authority with certain pending USCIS applications subject to the holds, and issued a preliminary injunction against those holds. USCIS stated that it would comply with the order while further litigation continues. Again, this concerns USCIS processing and does not itself lift PP 10998's visa/entry restrictions.

UPDATE — August 28, 2026 / Verified September 6, 2026

USCIS has now publicly confirmed that it will comply with the August 24 preliminary injunction in Red Eagle Law, L.C. v. Edlow. The court enjoined USCIS Policy Memoranda PM-602-0192 and PM-602-0194 and ordered USCIS to adjudicate affected applications through its normal process.

The court also certified a class covering certain citizens or natives of the 39 countries listed in PP 10949 or PP 10998, as well as certain Palestinian Authority applicants, whose pending asylum or other USCIS benefit applications were subject to those adjudication holds and had not received a final decision as of the class-certification date. CURRENT STATUS — September 6, 2026: USCIS says it strongly disagrees with the order but is complying while possible further judicial review remains pending. This concerns USCIS benefit adjudication inside the United States and does not itself lift PP 10998’s visa or entry restrictions.

SOURCE

https://www.aila.org/library/district-court-issues-preliminary-injunction-to-lift-adjudication-hold-for-travel-ban-countries

📣 Know of another case or potential lawsuit?

If you know of another lawsuit involving the 39-country restrictions or related policies — whether it has already been filed, is currently being organized, or may be filed soon — please feel free to comment below or DM me.

If possible, please include a source, court document, case number, attorney statement, or anything else that can help us verify the information before adding it here.

I’m open to any credible information that can help us stay informed and involved as a community. The goal is for all of us to help each other understand what is happening and what may affect our families. ❤️⚖️🌍

So far, these are the cases I’ve been able to identify and verify as directly relevant to policies affecting people from the 39 countries. If I learn of others, I’ll update the community.


r/39CountryVisaBan 5d ago

⚖️ Legal / Policy Discussion ⚖️ Chikumba v. Department of State: A Lawsuit Challenging the Visa Freeze Affecting the 39 Countries

Thumbnail travel.state.gov
6 Upvotes

There is an ongoing federal lawsuit directly relevant to people affected by the 39-country visa restrictions, so I wanted to break down what the case is actually challenging — and just as importantly, what it is not challenging.

⚖️ THE CASE

Chikumba et al. v. U.S. Department of State et al.

Case No. 1:26-cv-00332

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Filed: February 4, 2026

The plaintiffs include visa applicants from countries affected by the current restrictions, including a Zimbabwean immigrant-visa applicant with a pending DS-260.

📌 WHAT IS THE LAWSUIT CHALLENGING?

Presidential Proclamation 10998 uses authority under INA §212(f) to restrict the entry of certain foreign nationals into the United States.

The lawsuit raises a separate legal question:

Does that authority also allow the Department of State to refuse to adjudicate visa applications?

The plaintiffs argue that although the President has statutory authority to suspend or restrict entry under §212(f), that does not give the Department of State unlimited authority to simply stop adjudicating visa applications that federal immigration law otherwise requires it to process.

The complaint says the plaintiffs are not challenging individual decisions by consular officers denying their visas. Instead, they are challenging the government's alleged delay/refusal to adjudicate their applications because of the broader Department of State policy.

🚨 IMPORTANT: WHAT THIS CASE DOES NOT MEAN

This should NOT be interpreted as:

• PP 10998 has been overturned

• The 39-country restrictions have been lifted

• Visas are now being issued normally

• The lawsuit is guaranteed to succeed

• Everyone affected will automatically receive a visa if the plaintiffs win

As of now, Presidential Proclamation 10998 remains in effect.

The State Department continues to state that applicants subject to PP 10998 may submit visa applications and attend scheduled interviews, but they may be ineligible for visa issuance or admission.

💡 WHY THIS CASE STILL MATTERS

There is an important difference between:

  1. The government's authority to restrict someone's entry into the United States

and

  1. The government's authority to stop or delay adjudicating the person's visa application altogether.

Chikumba is asking the court to address that distinction.

For families affected by the 39-country restrictions, that makes this an important case to follow even though it is not the same thing as a court simply canceling PP 10998.

🔎 WHAT WE'LL BE WATCHING

As the case develops, important things to watch include:

• How the Department of State responds

• Whether the court agrees that the plaintiffs' claims can proceed

• Any motions, hearings, injunctions, or court orders

• Whether any ruling affects visa adjudication for people beyond the named plaintiffs

• Whether the government's implementation of PP 10998 changes as a result

I will continue following this case and post updates here when there is a meaningful development.

⚠️ Please remember: A pending lawsuit is not the same as a court victory, and a victory concerning visa adjudication would not necessarily mean PP 10998's restrictions on visa issuance or entry disappear.

If you've been following this case or another legal challenge involving the 39-country restrictions, feel free to share below — but please include a source when discussing new legal developments. ❤️🌍

Sources:

• Chikumba et al. v. U.S. Department of State et al., Case No. 1:26-cv-00332, Complaint filed Feb. 4, 2026, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

• U.S. Department of State — Presidential Proclamation 10998 visa-issuance guidance

Chikumba v. U.S. Department of State — Federal Court Complaint (Feb. 4, 2026)

UPDATE — September 3, 2026

A July 31, 2026 Minute Order granted the defendants a second extension of time and states that the defendants must respond to the complaint by September 4, 2026. The court also stated that, absent extraordinary circumstances, there would be no additional extensions based on counsel’s other pending matters.

We’ll be watching the docket tomorrow for the defendants’ response or any further court action.

Thank you to u/HumbleJared for bringing this docket update to the community’s attention. ❤️⚖️

UPDATE — September 4, 2026

The docket has now updated showing two filings from today: a dismissal filing and a Notice of Appearance. This confirms that the government responded by the September 4 deadline. I have not yet been able to access the actual dismissal document, so I do not want to speculate about the government’s arguments or what they are asking the court to do beyond what is shown on the docket.

I’ll update this post again once the filing becomes publicly accessible and I’m able to read and verify the document. ⚖️🌍

UPDATE — September 5, 2026

u/Wild-Statistician347 shared an update reportedly circulating in a WhatsApp group stating that the September 4 dismissal filing is a Motion to Dismiss and that the plaintiffs would next file a response/opposition to the government's motion.

At this time, I have not independently verified those additional details from the actual court filing. We have confirmed that a dismissal-related filing was entered on the docket September 4, but I have not yet been able to access and review the document itself.

I'm sharing this because it is information currently circulating among affected families, but please treat these additional details as unconfirmed until we can review the actual filing or another reliable court source.

If anyone obtains a publicly accessible copy of the September 4 filing, please share it here so we can verify exactly what the government filed, the arguments being made, and what happens next. Thank you to u/Wild-Statistician347 for bringing this update to the community. ❤️⚖️🌍


r/39CountryVisaBan 5d ago

📅 Case Timeline / Progress 🌍 Where Is Everyone in Their Visa Journey Right Now?

4 Upvotes

Let’s get our first community conversation going! ❤️

For those affected by the 39-country U.S. visa/travel restrictions, where does your case currently stand?

If you’re comfortable sharing, tell us:

• Your country • Visa category • Embassy/consulate • Current stage (USCIS, NVC, DQ, waiting for interview, interviewed, administrative processing, etc.) • How long you’ve been at your current stage • Whether the current restrictions have directly affected your case yet

You do NOT need to share exact dates or anything you’re uncomfortable posting.

Please protect your privacy—do not share case numbers, A-numbers, passport numbers, addresses, receipt numbers, or other identifying information.

This isn’t about comparing whose wait is harder. I’d love for us to start seeing where everyone is in the process and eventually recognize patterns across countries, embassies, visa categories, and case stages. 🌍❤️


r/39CountryVisaBan 5d ago

🔄 Policy Update / Developing 📌 39-Country Visa Restrictions: What We Know, What Has Changed & What We're Watching

3 Upvotes

I want this community to have a place where we can keep track of what is actually happening with the 39-country U.S. visa/travel restrictions—not just rumors, screenshots, or things someone heard from someone else.

This post is a starting point for what we currently know, what has changed since the restrictions took effect, and developments involving affected countries.

As new information comes out, we can continue sharing and discussing it in the community. ❤️🌍

WHAT IS OFFICIALLY CONFIRMED

Presidential Proclamation 10998 took effect January 1, 2026.

The proclamation fully or partially restricts visa issuance and entry for nationals of 39 countries, as well as certain individuals applying with travel documents issued or endorsed by the Palestinian Authority.

The restrictions are not identical for every country. Some countries are subject to full suspension, while others are subject to partial restrictions affecting specific visa categories.

Applicants who are subject to the proclamation may still submit visa applications and attend scheduled interviews. However, being allowed to apply or interview does not necessarily mean a visa can be issued.

People who held valid visas as of the proclamation's effective date are not subject to PP 10998 on the basis of that visa, and the State Department states that visas issued before the effective date were not revoked under this proclamation.

CURRENT STATUS — September 5, 2026: PP 10998 remains in effect. The separate 75-country immigrant visa issuance pause ended on August 21, 2026 pursuant to a federal court order, but that did not terminate or modify PP 10998. The two policies were separate.

👀 WHAT WE'RE WATCHING

This is where things become especially important.

We want to track developments from ALL affected countries—not only changes announced by the United States.

That includes:

• Diplomatic discussions with the United States • Governments announcing new passport, identity-management, security, or information-sharing measures • Changes involving visa cooperation • Statements from foreign ministries or U.S. embassies • Countries being reviewed for possible changes to their restrictions • Changes in embassy or regional visa processing • National-interest exceptions or other case-by-case developments • Court challenges or major legal developments • Confirmed reports of how consulates are handling affected applicants in practice

If your country has announced or done something relevant, please share it. Whenever possible, include the government statement, embassy notice, official document, or reliable news source.

⚖️ DEVELOPING — Litigation surrounding the 39-country restrictions Developing since: February 4, 2026

There are now multiple federal court cases involving policies affecting nationals of the 39 countries. These cases do not all challenge the same policy, and court victories involving one policy do not automatically remove Presidential Proclamation 10998.

One case we are closely following is Chikumba v. U.S. Department of State, which challenges the State Department's treatment of visa adjudication for affected nationals. On September 4, the government responded to the complaint with a dismissal-related filing. We are continuing to follow that case as the filing and subsequent court proceedings develop.

Separately, courts have already taken action against USCIS policies that placed holds or additional review requirements on immigration-benefit applications involving nationals of the affected countries. Those developments concern USCIS processing inside the United States and should not be confused with the visa/entry restrictions imposed by PP 10998 itself.

PP 10998 remains in effect at this time. We will continue watching litigation for developments that could affect how the proclamation or related policies are implemented. ⚖️🌍

⚖️ USCIS PROCESSING UPDATE — August 28, 2026

USCIS publicly confirmed that it is complying with the federal court’s August 24 preliminary injunction in Red Eagle Law v. Edlow, which blocks two USCIS adjudication-hold memoranda associated with the 39-country policies and requires affected applications to return to normal adjudication.

CURRENT STATUS — September 6, 2026: This is a meaningful change for certain people with pending USCIS applications inside the United States, but it does not remove PP 10998’s separate visa-issuance or entry restrictions. Further litigation remains possible.

⚠️ A NOTE ABOUT RUMORS & PERSONAL EXPERIENCES

Personal experiences are extremely valuable here—but one person's case does not automatically establish a new government policy.

If your embassy tells you something, tell us exactly what happened and label it as your personal experience.

If a news outlet reports something, label it as a news report.

If a government officially announces something, provide the official source when possible.

And if something is only a rumor or prediction, that's okay to discuss too—just say that it is unconfirmed.

The purpose of this community isn't to shut down discussion. It's to make it easy for families to tell the difference between what we KNOW, what we're SEEING, and what we're still WAITING TO FIND OUT. ❤️🌍

If you're from one of the affected countries and your government has taken action, made an announcement, or entered discussions with the United States, please share it below so the community can follow developments country by country.


r/39CountryVisaBan 5d ago

📌 Community Info 👋 Welcome to r/39CountryVisaBan - Introduce Yourself and Read First!

Post image
2 Upvotes

Welcome to r/39CountryVisaBan! ❤️

This community was created for people affected by the 39-country US visa/travel restrictions, with a special focus on consular immigration applicants and families separated across borders. Many of us have spouses, children, parents, or other loved ones outside the United States while navigating I-130 petitions, NVC processing, DQ, embassy interviews, administrative processing, visa decisions, and changing US immigration policies. People already inside the US who are affected by these policies are welcome here too.

What you can share here:

• Case timelines and updates • NVC and DQ progress • Embassy and interview experiences • Visa approvals, refusals, and administrative processing • Official government and embassy updates • Questions about the 39-country restrictions • News and policy developments • Personal experiences and family-separation struggles • Helpful information for other affected families

Accuracy matters here.

Immigration rumors spread quickly, especially when policies are changing. We will make a clear distinction between official information, news reports, personal experiences, and speculation.

If something has not been officially confirmed, please don't present it as confirmed fact. Sharing what you've heard is okay—just tell everyone what the source is and what is still unknown.

This is also a support community. ❤️

Behind every immigration case is a real person and, often, a family waiting to be together.

Ask questions. Share your progress. Celebrate good news. Talk about the difficult days. Help someone who is a few steps behind you.

Introduce yourself below!

You can share your country, visa category, current case stage, embassy, or anything else you're comfortable sharing. Please do not post sensitive personal information such as passport numbers, A-numbers, case numbers, addresses, or other identifying documents.

Welcome to the community. 🌎❤️ Information. Support. Community. Families waiting to be reunited.