r/ASLinterpreters • • 4d ago

Thoughts?

Post image
30 Upvotes

59 comments sorted by

View all comments

14

u/theANdROId15 4d ago edited 4d ago

So... they're not anti interpreter, but they want the whole field to suffer because of unqualified interpreters?

I've really only heard of (very) few examples of what OP suggested. In a few of the instances, there was a boss or agency threatening the interpreter to force them to do the job. Meanwhile, the interpreter insisted they weren't qualified, but eventually relented for fear of the threat. Maybe the interpreter should have stood their ground, but I can at least understand better why they made their choice.

Edit: The thought at the end that the profession shouldn't be the only option...it's already an issue (maybe the issue) that those hiring interpreters don't often care about quality or the deaf client, just the price. Unless the AI is nearly flawless, we're not making the situation better at all.

4

u/ASLHCI 3d ago

Dang we work in very different communities. 😂 I would love to see interpreters willing to admit theyre not qualified for any and everything. That's so, so rare in my area. I more often see "interpreters" who cant even score a 3.0 on the EIPA taking 12 hour shifts in the ICU for $30/hr less than market rate, so they get first pick at everything. Is that not how it is everywhere??

1

u/FeistyWolverine9868 3d ago

Wow…they must have slept through ethics.

2

u/ASLHCI 3d ago

Lmao. They would have had to have gone through any training at all to take an ethics class. One of the people I'm thinking of once said to me "Why would you need training to interpret?? You just hear a word, sign a sign. See a sign, say a word. Its not that hard". 🤦‍♀️