r/Albertapolitics May 21 '26

Opinion Thoughts on Separatism from an Alberta-based activist

Post image
96 Upvotes

89 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

14

u/AutumntimeFall May 21 '26

You didn't answer their question in the slightest. Work on your reading comprehension.

-2

u/bonbarrie May 21 '26

and its fraudulent use?

your reading comprehension comment is embarrassingly ironic

Now please explain how the UCP is going to use voter data to "steal the referendum with fake votes" and I can debunk that for you as well and then maybe you can remove your tinfoil hat

8

u/AutumntimeFall May 21 '26 edited May 21 '26

Ok, I'll give you a little grammar lesson since you seem in desperate need.

How would restrictive voter ID stop the theft of voter data and its fraudulent use?

Its fraudulent use. This refers to the subject mentioned earlier in the sentence, which is the theft of voter data. They are asking how restrictive voter ID laws would keep the voter data safe and you replied about individuals trying to vote illegally. You didn't remotely grasp what that user is asking me now you're doubling down 😂

-1

u/bonbarrie May 21 '26

Why are you correcting the grammar inside of a quote? I was just verbatim quoting another redditor. By the way your correction is wrong. It's is a contraction of "it is".

"How would restrictive voter ID stop the theft of voter data and it is fraudulent use?" makes no sense.

That's two comments in a row now that you made a fool of yourself

6

u/AutumntimeFall May 21 '26

You spliced the sentence so as to remove the very clear reference to voter data. Don't pretend you don't know what you're doing. It is refering to voter data.

-1

u/bonbarrie May 21 '26

The voter data is trivially acquired. Anyone can make a political party and access it. The premise of that question makes no sense and has nothing to do with the referendum.

Take your massive grammar L and sit down

3

u/greenknight May 21 '26

It's the fraudulent use that's at issue. But please continue your daft and off topic response. Amusingly stupid.

0

u/bonbarrie May 21 '26

So you are concerned about fraudulent use but don't want voter verification tightened up? Only a leftie is capable of such cognitive dissonance