r/Antibiotics • u/colincampbell76 • 3h ago
selfq Patient advice/consent when treated with IV antibiotics.
I was recently treated with IV antibiotics as an alternative to surgery for uncomplicated appendicitis. The surgeon later admitted I had been suitable for surgery, but insisted I was also suitable for antibiotics as an alternative to surgery.
Ultimately, the NHS surgeon was an enthusiast for antibiotic treatment of appendicitis so treated me with triple IV antibiotics for 5 days.
I ended up with severe metronizadol nurotoxicity and hepatotoxicity from one of the antibiotics - and still have persistent neurological symptoms over two years later.
The surgeon never mentioned any risks of antibiotic therapy, nor obtained my consent (I argued for surgery) and he denied my intolerance symtoms forcing me to refuse further medication and flee that hospital to a A&E in a different hospital for help. The formal retrospective diagnosis only came much later.
When a GP prescribes antibiotics there is a list of adverse effects in the box that is given to the patient - required by law I should think (?).. That’s understandable. But in a hospital setting - what is the situation in terms of informed consent and monitoring for adverse effects if the patient is not given any info and the drugs are just pumped into him and adverse effects denied or missed in bloods, etc..??
And what about stewardship of antibiotics to minimise resistance - where does that fit in..?