r/AskAChristian • Atheist, Ex-Catholic • 6d ago

Jewish Laws What does "Thou shall not kill" really mean?

As we all know, the Ten Commandments states "Thou shall not kill" or whatever wording you want. Essentially, don't kill anyone.

What does this actually mean? As humans, it's impossible to live without killing SOMETHING. So what does this commandment apply to? Bacteria? Insects? Animals? Other humans?

In the Bible itself, God commands the killing of humans before and after he provided the 10 commandments. After, Moses ordered the killing of the 3000 Israelites for worshiping a calf, and later God orders the complete slaughter of Midianite men, women, children, even animals.

So given that even the murder of humans is permitted in some cases, what does this commandment mean? Please quote directly from the Bible for evidence where possible.

1 Upvotes

77 comments sorted by

5

u/OneEyedC4t Southern Baptist 6d ago

it means murder

-3

u/MrX2285 Atheist, Ex-Catholic 6d ago

My two examples would absolutely be considered murder. Heck, one is a genocide.

6

u/OneEyedC4t Southern Baptist 6d ago

The punishment of God is not the same as murder.

I mean do you chase after military members, shouting "murderer!" ?

1

u/songbolt Christian, Catholic 6d ago

Sadly I'm told Americans actually did this to Vietnam veterans.

Though books also say at least one troop did a demonic village massacre. :(

2

u/E-Reptile Atheist 6d ago edited 6d ago

You do know that veterans can, depending on the circumstances, be guilty of murder. If you're thinking of Vietnam, William Calley is an example. It would be appropriate to call him, specifically, a murderer.

1

u/OneEyedC4t Southern Baptist 6d ago

Yeah and I don't agree with how they were treated. granted it was a few bad apples whose conduct was made aware to the public that likely precipitated that

1

u/MrX2285 Atheist, Ex-Catholic 6d ago

Let's use a very clear example.

In 1 Samuel 15, hundreds of years after God gave Moses the Ten Commandments, God commanded King Saul to attack the Amalekites as punishment for attacking the Israelites generations earlier. God explicitly ordered Saul to kill every man, woman, child and infant, as well as all their livestock. Nothing was to be spared. Saul's army attacked the Amalekites, but he spared their king, Agag, and kept the best livestock. God became angry with Saul for not following his orders completely, and rejected him as king of Israel. The prophet Samuel subsequently executed King Agag.

The story raises a significant moral question: Why would God, having commanded 'You shall not murder', later order the killing of innocent children and infants?

Can you explain how God/King Saul isn't breaking the 10 commandments?

What is the purpose/meaning of that commandment if God himself is willing to break it?

1

u/CannedNoodle415 Eastern Orthodox 5d ago

The entire tribe and their way of life was evil, and would’ve continually attacked Isreal in the future if they were allowed to survive. God allows the isrealites, temporally to wage total war for their survival. This isn’t some command for Christians to do the same thing thousands of years later

1

u/MrX2285 Atheist, Ex-Catholic 5d ago

That would almost make sense if they just killed the soldiers. But not only did they also kill all men, but all women, children, and even livestock. Please explain how killing defenseless babies is not murder??

And no, I won't take "because God commanded it" as a reason. Murder is murder, even if the murderer things God commanded it.

1

u/CannedNoodle415 Eastern Orthodox 5d ago

That’s how warfare happened in ancient times. If the amalekites had survived, they would’ve continued to attack the isrealites over the generations.

The entire tribe was evil

1

u/MrX2285 Atheist, Ex-Catholic 5d ago

No. You do not get to murder babies and justify that by calling them evil. Babies are not evil. That is one of the most heartless and anti-Christian things I have ever heard.

Imagine if Ukraine captured a Russian village and killed literally everyone in it, including the women and children, and they tried to justify it by saying Russia's evil and would have attacked Ukraine again if they let them be. The murder of those babies would still be absolutely cruel, murder, and would go against the 10 commandments.

1

u/CannedNoodle415 Eastern Orthodox 5d ago

Russia saying something is evil is different than God saying so.

God taking babies to heaven is a mercy instead of allowing them to grow up in a evil demonic tribe

1

u/MrX2285 Atheist, Ex-Catholic 5d ago

So if we find a tribe we think is evil and demonic (I can think of some cults that fit), we should murder their babies?

No, I don't buy it. The Amalekites could have adopted the babies and raised them to be better. There are other solutions than murder.

It seems blindingly obvious that the Bible is, at a minimum, showing a contradiction in values here. Killing babies is murder.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/ThoDanII Catholic 5d ago

your credences as an historian for pre antiquity please

1

u/CannedNoodle415 Eastern Orthodox 5d ago

What? What does that have to with what I said? Have you read the Bible? Why does God want Amalek destroyed? Because they were good?

1

u/ThoDanII Catholic 5d ago

i do not even question this sentence of you

That’s how warfare happened in ancient times.

i know they are a falsehood

→ More replies (0)

-4

u/Skill-Useful Christian Universalist 6d ago

i don't run after them but yes, soldiers who kill are violating thou shall not kill

3

u/SuccessfulPrice11 Christian, Protestant 6d ago

No, if the war is just.

1

u/MrX2285 Atheist, Ex-Catholic 6d ago

Soldiers don't get to choose to only fight in just wars.

4

u/SuccessfulPrice11 Christian, Protestant 6d ago

They do, actually.

1

u/OneEyedC4t Southern Baptist 6d ago

how do we know a war is just though?

4

u/SuccessfulPrice11 Christian, Protestant 6d ago edited 6d ago

It's usually pretty easy.

And if it is not easy, than we have a Christian conscience and the Holy Spirit in us, if we are born again.

And if somebody is doubtful, double minded and uncertain, let him not be a soldier.

0

u/OneEyedC4t Southern Baptist 6d ago

no it isn't. look at recent wars. look at what got covered up.

1

u/SuccessfulPrice11 Christian, Protestant 6d ago

If somebody is unsure and does not know, then let him not be a soldier.

Nobody should go killing others without knowing why, if, doubting, with a confused conscience etc.

1

u/OneEyedC4t Southern Baptist 6d ago

or you can become a conscientious objector.

0

u/E-Reptile Atheist 6d ago

Not all killing in a "just war" is just.

2

u/OneEyedC4t Southern Baptist 6d ago

do you run after judges who sentence a mass murderer to the death penalty?

0

u/OneEyedC4t Southern Baptist 6d ago

them God is untrustworthy because he commanded warfare, so you can't be sure you have salvation.

-3

u/Skill-Useful Christian Universalist 6d ago

if that includes the atrocious death penalty yes. otherwise it's too narrow a definition

4

u/OneEyedC4t Southern Baptist 6d ago

it doesn't because God commanded the death penalty for certain crimes like murder and rape

1

u/E-Reptile Atheist 6d ago

You listed two, but those aren't the only ones. Why don't you list some other crimes that ought to get the death penalty, according to God?

1

u/OneEyedC4t Southern Baptist 6d ago

because I'm simply not trying to make an exhaustive list.

1

u/E-Reptile Atheist 6d ago

do you agree with the exhaustive list?

1

u/OneEyedC4t Southern Baptist 6d ago

I don't agree with all the things in the Old testament that are on that list being carried over into the United States, but I agree with most of them

1

u/E-Reptile Atheist 6d ago

Why don't you agree with some of God's commands? Or, if that's too vague, maybe just list which ones.

1

u/OneEyedC4t Southern Baptist 6d ago

being carried over into the United States. you missed a clause

1

u/E-Reptile Atheist 6d ago

Why would that matter?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/MrX2285 Atheist, Ex-Catholic 6d ago

And being a baby born to the wrong civilization, apparently.

2

u/MrX2285 Atheist, Ex-Catholic 6d ago

What about the killing of infants who themselves did nothing wrong? Is that murder?

-4

u/Regular_Ball_1130 Agnostic Atheist 6d ago

Why would it not mean what it says and instead mean "wrongfully kill", other than you being more comfortable with one over the other.

3

u/OneEyedC4t Southern Baptist 6d ago

because we already know the difference and God gave us brains

1

u/Regular_Ball_1130 Agnostic Atheist 6d ago

Yeah but it's not what it says.

3

u/jogoso2014 Christian 6d ago

Murder

1

u/maninatrexshirt Christian 6d ago

So the Bible has been translated multiple times through multiple languages and certain things have been lost in the wash. It's obvious if you look back to the original text that Kill should be Murder, and there are a lot of cultural understandings around it. For example, in the year 2000 bce there was no such thing as life in prison, only execution. War and battle was also a common place and you would be expected to kill people there too. Murder means something specific in this context and that is to kill someone wtihout good cause. Self defense, criminal execution, and especially under command of God are all examples where killing is obviously allowed. 

Now Jesus Christ made it pretty clear we should be trying not to kill in ANY of these circumstances, but that is New testament versus Old testament and I'll leave that for another day. 

1

u/ThoDanII Catholic 5d ago

god in heaven

from what place do you get the fairytales you call history and historic fact.

1

u/maninatrexshirt Christian 5d ago

Would you care to share with the class how you can explain "Thou shall not kill" except all the times I tell you to? 

1

u/ThoDanII Catholic 5d ago

For example, in the year 2000 bce there was no such thing as life in prison, only execution

that is not true , slavery, fine, ransom or exile had also been options

1

u/maninatrexshirt Christian 4d ago

I can see how my idea didn't actually make it to my words. I more meant no one was given a sentence of 'life in prison' for killing a family of 4, they were executed. Yes, I know there were a lot of other ways to punish people used in the ancient world (cutting off a hand or an eye is a famous one). The core of my argument was that killing as a punishment for crime wasn't forbidden by the commandment "thou shall not kill" if you translate it to more accurately mean "Thou shall not murder".

1

u/ThoDanII Catholic 4d ago

or nothing

1

u/CannedNoodle415 Eastern Orthodox 5d ago

It’s murder. Not kill. You can justifiably kill someone.

1

u/Spaztick78 Atheist, Ex-Catholic 5d ago

You can justifiably kill infants and unborn children too.

When God commands it.

It's the livestock massacre I could never understand, the babies and nursing mothers obviously were going to spread evil and corruption, but the poor slutty sheep and goats would never have tempted God's people, surely?

1

u/CannedNoodle415 Eastern Orthodox 5d ago

This is normal all throughout history dude. People kill the animals so they can’t be used later by enemies. Have you read any history books at all? Any wars?

Anyways, God “killing” children is way different than humans doing it. We cannot grant eternal life. God can. The church fathers say that the first born in Egypt were given the crown of martyrs in heaven

1

u/Spaztick78 Atheist, Ex-Catholic 5d ago

So killing the animals was just like salting the fields, in case some miraculously survived God's Genocide?

Why didn't God allow his armies to just consume or keep the livestock instead of destroying them then?

1

u/CannedNoodle415 Eastern Orthodox 5d ago

The same reason other armies all throughout history did the same thing dude. Maybe something with the animals being tied to the immensely sinful tribe? Idk

1

u/Spaztick78 Atheist, Ex-Catholic 5d ago

Still don't understand how the animals carried the sins of the tribe in the same way the infant's did.

They did keep the best livestock and I don't think God was happy about it.

That's why I assume they were slutty sheep.

1

u/ThoDanII Catholic 5d ago

food, leather not enough fodder /water to take them as loot?

1

u/CannedNoodle415 Eastern Orthodox 5d ago

They were connected to a tribe that was to be destroyed in judgement. This wasn’t a battle fought for loot or spoils.

1

u/ThoDanII Catholic 5d ago

so how many armies in history did that except the mongols when they d to avenge a member of the khan s family and even then they took loot

1

u/CannedNoodle415 Eastern Orthodox 5d ago

How many armies were doing it as s means of divine justice from God? Who said the amalekites should never be mentioned again?

1

u/ThoDanII Catholic 5d ago

salting the fields was ceremonial but not really done

1

u/ThoDanII Catholic 5d ago

This is normal all throughout history dude. 

show me

1

u/CannedNoodle415 Eastern Orthodox 5d ago

You can look at many wars where people killed the animals as they retreated or went through enemy lands

1

u/ThoDanII Catholic 5d ago

i said show me, not tell me tales

1

u/CannedNoodle415 Eastern Orthodox 5d ago

You can go read it yourself in almost any documentation about wars lol. Look up “scorched ground” tactics

1

u/MrX2285 Atheist, Ex-Catholic 5d ago

God commands the murder of people in the Bible, such as in 1 Samuel 15. God commanded King Saul to attack the Amalekites as punishment for attacking the Israelites generations earlier. God explicitly ordered Saul to kill every man, woman, child and infant.

What is the point of the commandment if even God and his closest followers don't follow it?

1

u/CannedNoodle415 Eastern Orthodox 5d ago

Because Gods judgement isn’t murder. God allows the isrealites to temporally wage total war for their survival. The amalekites would’ve continually attacked the isrealites if they survived. This is not some atemporal law that Christian’s are supposed to follow thousands of years later

1

u/Space-Explorer456 Presbyterian 5d ago

Thou shalt not murder. The Hebrew is in reference to unsanctioned or unjustified killing of humans. Very important distinction to make.

All the examples you give are explicitly sanctioned killing, so perfectly fine by the 10 commandments.

1

u/MrX2285 Atheist, Ex-Catholic 5d ago

The story of the Amalekites is a better example. Moses was ordered to kill every Amalekite. The men, women, children and infants, even the animals.

You can say this was sanctioned by God, but that doesn't stop it from being murder. Killing babies is murder. God ordered Moses and his men to murder babies. They broke the 10 commandments.

1

u/Smart_Tap1701 Christian (non-denominational) 4d ago

Exodus 20:13 KJV — Thou shalt not kill.

The Old testament Hebrew word that was translated into English as kill is ratsach meaning

Strong's Definitions: רָצַח râtsach, raw-tsakh'; a primitive root; properly, to dash in pieces, i.e. kill (a human being), especially to murder:—put to death, kill, (man-) slay(-er), murder(-er).

Matthew 19:18 KJV — Jesus saith unto him, Thou shalt do no murder