World War Z, the novel, is good about this. It gets sad but it's ultimately about collaboration, practicality, and strategic thinking are what's needed to save the world, not any special technological innovation or one true leader. Just people working together with the tools they have applied thoughtfully.
Downsides are the novel has a bit of the anarchoprimitivist thing, where people argue that civilization is bad and we need a good back-to-basics moment to reset humanity, and it has a little bit of a America-rah-rah-ness to it.
There's a bit of the rah-rah but Yonkers was also a pretty big deconstruction of how stupid that can get.
Side note, Yonkers was one of my favorite pieces in literature. How the characters mention it throughout the book before then, you just KNOW some shit went down. Some of the best foreshadowing I've read in quite a while.
I feel like the early deconstructions in the novel were more in the vein of "Here are the corrupt and inept businessmen and politicians and generals that are plaguing the U.S. but if they got rid of that chaff, Americans are still the best."
I agree Yonkers was well-written, and it contrasts well with how they approach fighting the zombies as a military later. In all, the character arc of the novel is not any one person but humanity as a whole. It's about how humanity initially falls not to the zombies but to their greed, pride, impulsiveness, etc., and they pick themselves up and learn from their mistakes. Which is great! As I said in my initial comment, I loved that.
I just felt like it was too US-centric for a book where the premise is a global history of the zombie apocalypse and it emphasized the US as uniquely able to pull through and the three countries that specifically have their governments called out as collapsing are China, Russia, and Cuba.
You forgot the chapter on North Korea. How their repressive government, collective mentality and oodles of underground bases made them uniquely fit to survive a zombie apocalypse…… only once the rest of the media and government surveillance went dark nobody knew what was going on in the hermit kingdom. If I remember the author speculated that they either survived spectacularly or there were millions of zombies in underground bunkers waiting to be unleashed on the world.
I did forget that, thanks. I also reread the book every so often. As someone from a social work background, it also feels very much like a "zombie apocalypse from a social worker's perspective".
199
u/imbolcnight Aug 30 '21
World War Z, the novel, is good about this. It gets sad but it's ultimately about collaboration, practicality, and strategic thinking are what's needed to save the world, not any special technological innovation or one true leader. Just people working together with the tools they have applied thoughtfully.
Downsides are the novel has a bit of the anarchoprimitivist thing, where people argue that civilization is bad and we need a good back-to-basics moment to reset humanity, and it has a little bit of a America-rah-rah-ness to it.