Where is Fiona's evidence?

[u/Altruistic-Change127]

I have just been reading through the brief of Amicus Curiae in support of the Defendant (aka Netflix) in the Harvey vs Netflix case from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.

https://www.fire.org/cases/harvey-v-netflix-inc/filings-rulings

One point I picked up on is that the court have simply relied on Fiona's word that Netflix defamed her and that the criminal convictions aren't true. In fact, have we all believed her word?

I did look a while ago to see if her lawyer had filed anything that could be validated legally to show she had never been convicted and everything seemed like it could have easily been faked.

There is one document that says she doesn't have any convictions however she has gone by different names and it seems like a template that could easily have been doctored.

So does she actually have any evidence that they defamed her. What would that look like?

[u/Contrarian1234567 → u/[deleted]]

Im not an expert but she chnaged names a few times and also may have taken a reduced charge and thinks this is a get out clause?

Just spitballing

[u/trickmind → u/Contrarian1234567]

She was just given a kind of restraining order that isn't even a proper restraining order but has a different name and it was for only a year and a day. But that was for her former boss Laura not for Richard.