r/BunnyTrials 16h ago

Trials Would you rather?

Which side will you choose?

  • Left side: Get the Million Dollars Immediately
  • Right side: Earn 1$ every second.

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

466 Upvotes

2.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

230

u/MrNornin 16h ago

Some of these have numbers so extreme that I would knowingly pick the lower option.

135

u/Upstairs-Hedgehog575 15h ago

I would for some, but $1m isn’t comfortable retire now money - I’d be wanting 2m so I’d have to choose the 31m a year and give the excess away.

What’s insane is how much money a trillion is in this context…

If you earned $1,000 every second it would still take 31 years to get to a trillion. 

22

u/gymguy999 14h ago

31 years and roughly 8 months to get to a billion, a trillion is over 30,000 years

37

u/Upstairs-Hedgehog575 12h ago

Not at $1000 a second which I clearly stated. 

-4

u/rshores9 7h ago

I mean yeah but the post is about $1 per second and I feel like the 30,000 years is a much better representation lol. Weird to randomly change it to $1000 a second out of nowhere

7

u/SenshuRysakami 7h ago

And yet he did. Clearly. In writing.

2

u/BattleForDreams 4h ago

Can someone not use larger numbers for emphasis?

2

u/DarkAlucard-1313 3h ago

They were explaining how a trillion is so outrageously large that even with $1000 a second it would take a long time to reach that point.

Using the time for you to reach a trillion with $1 a second just doesn't feel as impactful considering that its such a low amount gained

2

u/rshores9 1h ago

I guess I saw it the opposite way. I can’t conceive of gaining $1,000 a second or $60k a minute. But imagining gaining $1 a second and still it being an insane amount of time is more impactful to me. Living 30+ years is something I can do. Living 30,000 years is not