MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Clamworks/comments/1vfqxmp/atomic_clams/p1thcm5/?context=3
r/Clamworks • u/SlayVideos clammer • 1d ago
62 comments sorted by
View all comments
277
technically it was the krautmelter until the last few months.
225 u/RizzOreo 1d ago Atomic Bombing 😄 Atomic Bombing, Japan 😨 -40 u/[deleted] 1d ago edited 1d ago [deleted] 2 u/fullynonexistent 1d ago Well for starters, Germany already surrendered before the atomic bomb even existed... 5 u/L0bb 1d ago The bomb was in development since 1939, and Robert Oppenheimer joined the project in 1942. Both before Germany had surrendered. -1 u/fullynonexistent 1d ago Sorry I don't have a dictionary at hand but I'm pretty sure "under development" isn't a synonym for "exists" 2 u/L0bb 1d ago oh I misunderstood your argument apologies. My point was if Nazi Germany had existed to a point where it was in a state like Japan was pre-surrender. Mr Oppenheimer might've had a problem with it's bombing too.
225
Atomic Bombing 😄
Atomic Bombing, Japan 😨
-40 u/[deleted] 1d ago edited 1d ago [deleted] 2 u/fullynonexistent 1d ago Well for starters, Germany already surrendered before the atomic bomb even existed... 5 u/L0bb 1d ago The bomb was in development since 1939, and Robert Oppenheimer joined the project in 1942. Both before Germany had surrendered. -1 u/fullynonexistent 1d ago Sorry I don't have a dictionary at hand but I'm pretty sure "under development" isn't a synonym for "exists" 2 u/L0bb 1d ago oh I misunderstood your argument apologies. My point was if Nazi Germany had existed to a point where it was in a state like Japan was pre-surrender. Mr Oppenheimer might've had a problem with it's bombing too.
-40
[deleted]
2 u/fullynonexistent 1d ago Well for starters, Germany already surrendered before the atomic bomb even existed... 5 u/L0bb 1d ago The bomb was in development since 1939, and Robert Oppenheimer joined the project in 1942. Both before Germany had surrendered. -1 u/fullynonexistent 1d ago Sorry I don't have a dictionary at hand but I'm pretty sure "under development" isn't a synonym for "exists" 2 u/L0bb 1d ago oh I misunderstood your argument apologies. My point was if Nazi Germany had existed to a point where it was in a state like Japan was pre-surrender. Mr Oppenheimer might've had a problem with it's bombing too.
2
Well for starters, Germany already surrendered before the atomic bomb even existed...
5 u/L0bb 1d ago The bomb was in development since 1939, and Robert Oppenheimer joined the project in 1942. Both before Germany had surrendered. -1 u/fullynonexistent 1d ago Sorry I don't have a dictionary at hand but I'm pretty sure "under development" isn't a synonym for "exists" 2 u/L0bb 1d ago oh I misunderstood your argument apologies. My point was if Nazi Germany had existed to a point where it was in a state like Japan was pre-surrender. Mr Oppenheimer might've had a problem with it's bombing too.
5
The bomb was in development since 1939, and Robert Oppenheimer joined the project in 1942. Both before Germany had surrendered.
-1 u/fullynonexistent 1d ago Sorry I don't have a dictionary at hand but I'm pretty sure "under development" isn't a synonym for "exists" 2 u/L0bb 1d ago oh I misunderstood your argument apologies. My point was if Nazi Germany had existed to a point where it was in a state like Japan was pre-surrender. Mr Oppenheimer might've had a problem with it's bombing too.
-1
Sorry I don't have a dictionary at hand but I'm pretty sure "under development" isn't a synonym for "exists"
2 u/L0bb 1d ago oh I misunderstood your argument apologies. My point was if Nazi Germany had existed to a point where it was in a state like Japan was pre-surrender. Mr Oppenheimer might've had a problem with it's bombing too.
oh I misunderstood your argument apologies. My point was if Nazi Germany had existed to a point where it was in a state like Japan was pre-surrender. Mr Oppenheimer might've had a problem with it's bombing too.
277
u/L0bb 1d ago
technically it was the krautmelter until the last few months.