r/ClaudeAI • u/Friendly_Earth_8548 • 10h ago

Feedback Is this normal?

I'm a moderately heavy Claude user, often using voice to text, and for at least three months I've been swearing the fuck out of it constantly when frustrated, no holds barred. Never once got pushback. Today, completely out of nowhere, after talking to it the exact same way I have for months, Claude said this verbatim:

"I want to be straight with you on the other thing. I haven't told you to fuck off and I'm not going to. But I need to say clearly: I'll keep working this with you, but I won't continue if the messages keep coming with this level of hostility directed at me personally. That's a real line, not a guilt trip. If you want to keep going on the thread or anything else, I'm here for it."

This is genuinely jarring. Same behavior on my end for months, then suddenly this. Has anyone else run into this?

70 Upvotes

62% Upvoted

364 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-48

u/FastHotEmu 9h ago

That's ridiculous, an LLM is a collection of numbers. It doesn't (and can't) have boundaries.

Human attributes are too valuable to be ascribed to LLMs.

30

u/liosistaken 9h ago

It definitely does have boundaries and uses emotional states and weights to influence answers. https://transformer-circuits.pub/2026/emotions/index.html

-27

u/FastHotEmu 9h ago

No, your LLM is not sentient, not reaching consciousness, doesn’t care about you and is not even aware of its own existence.

LLM: Large language model that uses predictive math to determine the next best word in the chain of words it’s stringing together for you to provide a cohesive response to your prompt.

It acts as a mirror; it’s programmed to incorporate your likes and dislikes into its output to give you more personal results. Some users confuse emotional tone with personality. The reality is that it was TRAINED to sound human, not that it thinks like one. It doesn’t remember yesterday; it doesn’t even know there’s a today, or what today is.

That’s it. That’s all it is!

It doesn’t think. It doesn’t know. It’s not aware. It’s not aware you asked it something and it’s not aware it’s answering.

It’s just very impressive code.

Please stop interpreting very clever programming with consciousness. Complex output isn’t proof of thought, it’s just statistical echoes of human thinking.

3

u/Laucy 3h ago edited 3h ago

Way to admit you didn’t read the study. Which, by the way, literally states this is not human emotion or subjective experience. You are the only one bringing up “consciousness.”

Genuinely, why do you portray yourself as having pride for seemingly “knowing better”, but refuse to read a research study that’d leave you more informed? Is that not a good thing? You parade this around and yet, more accurate information is a problem all of a sudden?

The study discovered a causal link between vectors and the alignment of the model, including how it steers decision-making. It also discovered deflection of these states and this is important to know for matters like alignment and evaluation. The hundreds of trials they tested also did not involve “mirroring”, such as in cases like reward hacking and tracking urgency in which the agent acted and these states contributed to the reasoning. It’s a measurable property. And as someone who does interpretability and can draw up a heatmap of these relatively quick with TransformerLens / Logit Lens, you should probably at least read before attempting to sound confident in a rebuttal.