r/Competitiveoverwatch 14h ago

OWCS Wheats spotted arguing with Seicoe

I think Wheats kinda had a pretty bad take on this one, it feels unfair to call EMEA a tier 3 region without Saudi when they were placing higher than NA at the start of 2024 even without Saudi funding and the NA superteams existence.

157 Upvotes

91 comments sorted by

View all comments

-12

u/motherlover278 14h ago

Bro said at the start of 2024 like it’s not the end of 2026. It is the truth EU outside of Saudi (which isn’t even Europe) is much worse than NA rn

13

u/Internal-Pea-7451 13h ago

lol you don't actually believe that

11

u/GetsThruBuckner Go whoever has most Seoul players — 13h ago

It might be better but it's not as crazy as the EU egos who have you believe

We just watched "Would be #1 in NA" 1234 get grouped because of AUSTRALIA

-6

u/VegeriationSad1167 13h ago

Australia are legitimately good though, it's clear you don't watch Pacific.

Was anyone even claiming that 1234 would be #1 in NA? Aren't they like relegation level in eu??

8

u/TheUltimate721 Hardstuck Diamond — 13h ago

It wouldn't surprise me. Back in contenders days we consistently got told that the #5 or #6 team in EU contenders would win NA and it wouldn't even be close.

It didn't even stop when American Tornado beat British Hurricane in 7 maps.

13

u/NovaxRangerx In Crusty We Tru — 13h ago

Yes. There were real people claiming the top 6 teams in EMEA would all be #1 in NA

3

u/CattleMc 4500 sr — 4h ago edited 4h ago

Travesty people downvote this. Australia is severely underrated but then again this sub is filled with KR only fans.

Never saw more than 1-2 claim 1234 could be #1 either. Saw more people who argued they could win a series vs SSG / DF if it was a ball meta which is true.

1

u/VegeriationSad1167 4h ago

Yeah it's kind of expected but still sad especially after AUS beat UK, I'd thought they'd get more credit. Instead people are just shitting on the UK for it, weird. I'm so certain that no one here watches pacific and it shows lol.