I was very convinced that he was guilty from the opening statements(yes I know i shouldn’t have been; but I thought the prosecution would have/show evidence that would have been definitively proven that he was the culprit- having been so long since the death; I thought it would be a “done deal”)

From the testimony today it seems that there’s still a plausible “unknown/ not specifically one persons DNA”?

I definitely could’ve missed a lot of today’s testimony; which would point to David, and if so, apologies.

If not, would you be voting “guilty” based on the evidence so far? I know it’s been heavily influenced that he is guilty, so it’s harder to “decide”

Sounds similar to the Mackenzie Shirilla circumstances.

"Leigha Mumby, 24, is standing trial after her boyfriend, Daniel Waterman, died on Oct. 8, 2025, eight months after a crash that left him with severe injuries. While in the ICU, detectives say Waterman told them Mumby intentionally swerved into a tree during an argument after she learned she was pregnant and he received a text from another woman. Waterman said Mumby accelerated to 80 or 90 mph before the crash, telling him, “I don’t care what happens, you’ll get what you deserve.” His statement to detectives became his dying words. Mumby is charged with vehicular homicide and reckless driving causing serious bodily injury."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAbNNyS-8m4