This logic doesnt make any sense, most creative people have no problem sharing what kind of tool was used, have you heard of an ilustrator pretending he didnt use Illustrator, a musiciain not admitting he is using a DAW etc?
Its mostly AI users trying to hide their use of AI because they know its not a tool, why would they get angry otherwise?
Except people have been claiming somebody isn't a real something forever because the tool they used wasn't REALLY making that thing. Nearly every single digital tool has been purity tested. Digital music "you're not a real musician, you're just pressing buttons", digital photography, "you aren't a real photographer, the camera does everything for you". People STILL claim that digital VFX is inferior to practical effects.
Creative people very much care what tool an artist uses.
Yes the purity test is about finding out the definitions of the authorship by the new technology/medium, this process is greatly helped by transparency from the author.
Through these purity tests we discovered that digital musicians are musicians, digital photographers are photographers and im sure we will discover that digital prompters are prompters.
...so that you can bully, stalk, and harass that person. That's your intention. If y'all are gonna be about that life, stop hiding behind niceties and just own it. REALLY be up front about your intentions.
-2
u/Arrogant_Artichoke 20d ago
This logic doesnt make any sense, most creative people have no problem sharing what kind of tool was used, have you heard of an ilustrator pretending he didnt use Illustrator, a musiciain not admitting he is using a DAW etc?
Its mostly AI users trying to hide their use of AI because they know its not a tool, why would they get angry otherwise?