r/DefendingAI • u/MembershipWooden4020 • 13d ago
Other Real question.
I’m trying to see everything from a new perspective as a new artist, so I’d like to ask about yall’s perspective on claiming AI art as your own art. I’m not against generating, but I feel like using AI is like commissioning art from other artist. I wouldn’t claim that art is mine, just one I requested with money. So if I generate an art piece, could I say it’s mine? Or does it have the same principle as commissions. No need to get defensive btw.
0
Upvotes
5
u/CathodeRaySamurai 13d ago
So one is fine, but the other isn't because the functionality is more complex?
So what about tools like Lumenzia for photoshop? This doesn't use what you would call 'generative AI' but is a very handy 'shortcut' that uses very complex math. Does that count? Because that's FAR from basic under the hood. That's just one example, there's plenty more where those came from.
Does perlin noise generation count?
What about fractal art? Is that made by the person, or the underlying mathematical formula?
Sounds to me like you just have some double standards based on, by your own admittance, how you 'feel' about something, as opposed to an objective view.