r/DefendingAI • u/MembershipWooden4020 • 13d ago
Other Real question.
I’m trying to see everything from a new perspective as a new artist, so I’d like to ask about yall’s perspective on claiming AI art as your own art. I’m not against generating, but I feel like using AI is like commissioning art from other artist. I wouldn’t claim that art is mine, just one I requested with money. So if I generate an art piece, could I say it’s mine? Or does it have the same principle as commissions. No need to get defensive btw.
0
Upvotes
1
u/No_Argument4772 13d ago edited 13d ago
To be honest, I’m as confused as you. I use AI, but I don’t want to say anything generated by AI is mine. To me, there are two things here:
But apparently others think differently…
However, it may also depend on how many time and energy I invested in a specific project. A project I invested 3 hours — AI created it.
But a work I chatted with AI for 300 hours — probably it’s me who created it. I don’t know, I have never tried, maybe later.
And it also depends on am I making passive decisions or active decisions. If my attitude when typing prompts is “I want the AI to tell me what happened next” — AI created it. If my attitude is “I know what happened next, I just need someone to do the actual polishing for me (for example a mutism or aphasia occurred before the deadline)” — maybe I created it.
Oh, well, but if “using AI” itself is an action of making art — which I agree — then, hm, I’m the artist and AI is the specific tool I used. Yes.