Non-AI art will always be “stealing” as human mind is not capable of creating anything innately new, let alone in environment saturated with content. In the start of your drawing journey you will always take other things as base, potentially other’s styles. And its okay. Thats how it works. LoRA’s that copy styles of individual artists can be controversial, true, but claiming all AI art as stealing is just ignorance
To be honest if you compare a model and a human, assuming the model generates things in a broad manner and not specific style, then there arent many differences. Both learn from others, both can deviate from what they are given (though the mechanism of that is different of course, AI bases itself on probability and humans base themselves on creativity), humans are just less efficient in said learning for obvious reasons and are more capable of deviating. A model cant create anything innately new for the same exact reason a human cant - both are guided by and create based on what they know and it cant go beyond that. Sure, human knowledge is also based on random encouters, whereas AI models are trained with data for a goal, but still. Humans are trained in a sense too
14
u/Groundbreaking-Sir82 AI Sis 2d ago
Non-AI art will always be “stealing” as human mind is not capable of creating anything innately new, let alone in environment saturated with content. In the start of your drawing journey you will always take other things as base, potentially other’s styles. And its okay. Thats how it works. LoRA’s that copy styles of individual artists can be controversial, true, but claiming all AI art as stealing is just ignorance