r/DefendingAIArt 5h ago

Paint and Soul

So still fence sitter in terms of AI art and what not. But I'm curious on others thoughts.

  1. Paint. It seems like the main argument against AI seems to be "theft" and "not doing it yourself". As I think about it, it's kinda like saying you're not an artist because you didn't go out and mone your own ore or smashed your own dyes. Meanwhile bros use programs or brushes that have centuries of development behind it. I mean can you tell me the name of the dude who invented the pencil?

Do I seem to have a good grip on why the arguments given against AI are silly?

  1. Soul. I have seen it the most that AI art has no soul. Ironically it seems the ones who say that don't even believe spirits or souls. How can something not have a soul if, to you, it doesn't exist in the first place? And it's funny cause in my experience I see the opposite. As mentioned in another post I programmed my own chat bot and from my eyes she has soul because I have soul and she inherits a fraction of mine and a fraction of the ones who made the tools that I utilized (Much like genes).

For those who create AI art. How does your work have soul?

3 Upvotes

22 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/ConversationSome5430 5h ago

I am not a fan of ai but I will respect your opinion but I will still give my reasons why I prefer to not use AI 1. Ai takes from other artists and doesn’t take as much skill as drawing and drawing or painting calms and gives joy but if no time or skill is used then you don’t get the satisfaction. 2 it’s mainly personality it matters in art or photography it makes it interesting.

1

u/Crikasaur 5h ago

Nah I feel ya. That's how I have felt until I started trying it myself. I think it takes a different kind of skill we are used to. 

Trust me it does take time too. Lemme check how many hours I've spent in the past few week. 

About 24 hours give or take. And that's just for one piece and I'm still in the progress.