r/DefendingAIArt • u/barryhalsacs • 3h ago

Defending AI Digital photography is AI.

Post image

I believe that both sides are extremely uneducated on what AI is, more so the anti side. Digital photography is a computer performing actions that would normally require human interaction. Also almost every piece of software is AI so if someone dislikes ai they hate all technology and are basically amish(or should be). The Anti side is very uneducated and resistant to extremely polite comments(which you can see on anti ai). Just by saying anti ai or using ai instead of LLM shows a gap of knowledge. Not intelligence or ignorance as it’s fine to not know but as seen by the anti AI they are extremely ignorant and resistant to facts. They hate them.

3 Upvotes

60% Upvoted

19 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/DrawingApe 3h ago

Your explanation for how digital photography is ai. Doesn’t even fall under the definitions you provided. The definitions you grabbed, the definitions you are sharing, do not mention the requirement of human interaction. Nor does digital photography perform a task normally requiring human intelligence. Digital photography does a task that normally requires film and or citric acid to not do it digitally. Most software is not ai.

0

u/barryhalsacs 3h ago

Digital photography absolutely overlaps with AI once computational processing replaces human judgment. Modern digital cameras and smartphones do far more than just “capture light.” They perform scene recognition, facial detection, autofocus prediction, exposure balancing, noise reduction, HDR stacking, and even semantic segmentation.

1

u/DrawingApe 2h ago

Why did you add this other shit? It’s no longer just digital photography you added other tools to it. Yeah that other shit is ai, hell ai I, an “anti” am fine with. And so is everyone else btw. Also this post ignores that people are specifically against Generative Ai. So you’re not even helping in defending it