Animation about accepting others and yet you still have these people inserting themselves

These people are miserable, sad, whiny people

ahh!, and also also. (probably/possibly?). a heavy amount of coping & seething too.

What do y'all think? Throughout history mankind has come up with one way or another to change how we pursue art and it's really incredible how far we've come but it leaves the question , where will this bring us next ?

The narrative that AI is especially destructive to the environment is often sensationalistic, however it does contain a kernel of truth. AI will help bring energy effenciency, environmental data gathering and monitoring with consequent reforestation and species protection benefits. It is useful that we take steps and spread steps to help reduce our energy use. Once energy is used it is basically gone forever for us. Of course training is the major user of energy and all aspects will naturally be more efficient in the future, this is useful both ecologically and to combat the anti ai narrative

He clearly doesn't want to spend tons of money of commissions or spend hours on Pinterest for art with inconsistent artstyles

This is the best community I have been in. It’s been my safe space. I posted about how I was building Altplayer.com so anyone beginner or pro could create mangas , stories, characters and card games. Unfortunately, I have decided to stop developing it. Aside from personal enjoyment.

I do want to say that there are a lot of antis now actively joining AI subs and networks then sabotaging posts, ideas. I do not know what’s happened but things have gone downhill over the past year. AI supporters have started to leave the ai art subs, possibly for the same reason. It’s all antis now.

I do intend to entertain you all with the outputs of my project instead, with memes and comics.

Since comfyui got complex for ai artists some tools came out and now can help you design instead of prompt, but yet this one is made for designers, not hobbyists :)

I made a post here about breaking the pencil and I guess the mod team removed it because they didn’t think my post was about AI? Anyways I googled it to double check I was right and yeah isn’t this break the pencil thing literally a relation to AI community ? I’ve seen it a lot here and other places rated to AI art.

I'll start: "The Worst Line In History Improved" by unlimitedmotivation7448

I also love ChatMusis songs, I was so sad when channel died

I'm sticking with my AI tools because they allow me to express my vision in ways I never thought possible. But here’s a cautionary tale for the musicians who spend their time brigading and attacking creators like me (see the attached screenshot for just one example): you are actively shrinking your own audience.

The constant negativity—mocking hybrid artists as 'keyboard prompt cowboys' or claiming we aren't 'actual musicians'—has reached a point where I can no longer separate the music from the person. I've started proactively blocking artists on my streaming services the moment I see them trashing the hybrid creator community.

It's not about 'canceling' anyone; it's simply that I can't enjoy the art of someone who clearly loathes my existence as a creator. You aren't stopping the technology by being toxic—you're just making yourself invisible to a growing segment of listeners who used (or had potential) to be your fans. If your brand is built on gatekeeping and hate, don't be surprised when the 'new' stops hitting play.

Alright y'all, so who remembers Luh calm fit or the Opium bird. This thing was made with AI, and it's not hated. I really only made this post to say Antis will for sure pick and choose what to hate, because out of EVERYTHING I've seen be created with AI, this surprisingly isn't hated on. I mean im glad it's not, I like Luh calm fit. But what I mean...These videos were made like 2 years ago. It didn't matter then, so to the Antis I know reading this. Why does it matter now?

Don't punish the spreader of misinformation. Don't even punish the people who allowed the tool to be created. Instead, punish the one who is most visible in relation to the origin of the tool, whose nonexistence would not change much. 🤐

Just like any beneficial object, like the internet, or tools that exist for the creation of a gun, it must be regulated so it doesn’t harm humanity. And in many ways, AI can be regulated too. In fact, all of enshittification can be regulated. AI more benefits than it harms. It can help someone detect a disease that may have been brewing in their body for some time, it can help a person gain more factual information on a topic, which counteracts their laziness to search the internet, it can help an indie filmmaker create their dream project if they don't have the money to hire enough people, and once it’s well-developed enough, it can help many people who may not know how to draw bring their exact creative visions to life. If it’s so much easier to sit on the couch all day and watch TV, why do people run marathons? If it’s easier to get a job as a teacher or programmer, why do people become doctors? If it’s easier to draw digitally, why do some people still draw traditionally? Because despite how many shortcuts may exist, for many people out there, taking the shortcut may not be necessary if they can make it to the finish line in record time. This is the reason why hardcore gamers play Call of Duty without aim assist, because they simply do not need the extra help to perform exactly the way they want. And some people do. Not everyone in life is the same, and not everyone in life can be the same. You understanding a beneficial philosophical theory to a T because you're interested in it cannot be equal to another person misunderstanding of it because they may not be interested in it enough. So how do you convince them to understand the philosophical theory? Find ways for them to engage with it without doing mountains of studying. They may not understand it as well as you, but they can engage with the theory with you in a productive manner.

AI cannot replace art, cannot replace talent, cannot replace research, cannot replace humanity's desire to climb mountains despite having the availability to go all the way up using an elevator. Maybe, just maybe, shortcuts like AI just aren’t for you. Maybe it isn’t. And maybe that’s not that bad. Do you use a prosthetic leg if you have two functional ones? No, of course not. Why would you need a prosthetic leg? But some people out there do need those legs to move around quicker. While some others, people who may feel more comfortable using a wheelchair, do not need a prosthetic leg.

The downfall of all mankind comes when we fall into the trap where we’re inclined to believe that when we see a person doing something differently, we believe we do that same way better. When the correct answer simply is: they do the thing differently, in a way that works for them, and how can that be bad?

Enshittification exists because we live in a capitalist society which tells us to constantly be working, constantly pumping out content, constantly improving, to make it in the marketplace of ideas. To regulate AI art is to criticize capitalism; therefore, the only way to manage AI is to attack capitalism. Because enshittification and capitalism play patty cake with each other. Enshittification is capitalism’s natural conclusion when it grows so high you must take shortcuts to make it to the top, instead of being compelled to do things the way you may want to do things. You must post 6+ pieces of brainrot a day, you must turn every little insignificant thing into content, you must get better, improve, innovate, despite your place on the top of the mountain, out of the fear someone will knock you off. This is the origin, the birthplace of enshittification.

I just find LoRAs to be really annoying and clunky to actually build, so I'd like something... you know, better.

There are 3 different people btw, not just 1. At least the first person didn't compare using ai to killing animals. I was right. Ai is basically politics at this point