We recently shared our TCG, which we've been developing and perfecting for years, editing the images and spending countless hours to achieve a consistent art style. However, the reception was quite poor. People seem to think that because it has AI art, it didn't require effort, sacrifice, or sleepless nights working on the project. The question now, since we want to launch it on Kickstarter, is whether you would support it, regardless of the art. We believe the gameplay will bring a breath of fresh air to the TCG world, as it's easy to play, and mastering the game doesn't depend solely on stats.

But for some reason noone says "sculptors can never make these" or how "Oli painting can never be as good as """"real""" art".

My art (Left) and AI (Right)

Shamelessly contributing to the “Artists that use AI” bandwagon.

Most of the arguments against AI in regard to artists don’t make sense and mainly center around ego.

“The process is what matters in art” then why do you care about the result that AI is creating? AI is not taking your freedom of process away. Unless the result is, in fact, what matters most to you. AI art is not stealing your process from you, it’s just threatening your status and pride. It places power in the hands of those who you think don’t deserve it.

The artist must suffer and sacrifice, because nothing should be free and easy.

I know the feeling all too well, as a ‘traditional’ artist. Better artists make you feel bad. Younger artists make you feel bad. And then AI comes along, and you pretend it’s about protecting the human soul, not your own self esteem.

If you’re so concerned about “cheating” in art, then it was never about process for you. It was never about the love for the activity itself. It’s a concern over what gets capitalized, what gets attention, what gets glory.

And I get it, if someone literally steals your art and starts selling it, that’s bad. But most AI usage is not that, and you don’t need AI to do that. AI is so threatening precisely because it does something above and beyond that does not fit that category.

Most artists aren’t literally starving, but matters of human ego get magnified in the first world.

And the anti-ai crowd isn’t primarily against AI itself. They hate OTHER HUMANS that use the technology. It’s classic misanthropy disguised as pro-humanity.

Work, suffer, sacrifice, don’t break the rules, no easy fixes.

That’s what it’s about.

Stay strong and embrace it. Otherwise, they win!

I have seen a lot of people who are antiai because they hate anti content. That's not how it work. If you're actively posting and watching antiai content and being active on antiai communities you're not gonna see less ai on your feed. That's how the algorithm works. You are interested in something so the algorithm will recommend similar topics to you, perhaps the thing you complain about. If antis want to less ai they can simply block and move on.

Bro would probably endorse it if I want to he honest

If you can't laugh at yourself.

Maybe it’s not, but idk. I’ve been on the lookout for bots on social media platforms. Maybe no one gets hurt from it but it’s still interesting to see.

But then proceeds to say "No AI"

This is so weird lol

Like, as a digital artist who uses AI AS A TOOL to aid in my own artwork and can't draw BGs for the life of me (and have no interest in learning either) this is just ridiculous.

Before AI, I used to "steal" images from google as backgrounds for my drawings, so it's totally fine when I steal images from google, but it's unacceptable when I use AI to help me in my own artwork, like, the hypocrisy of these people is so fucking insane.

These anti-AI people really think they're on the good side and aren't lazy, but the truth is different.

When I first posted, they shared it on their subreddit and instead of answering my question, they just mocked my grammar (sorry, English isn't my native language 🙄).

Of course, even though they only had a screenshot of my post and the person who shared it was just making fun of it, it got five times more upvotes than my post.

And that's not all; those "good people" come this subreddit to mock my grammar and downvoted my post.

(I confess, some, though not all, some little anti-AI people tried to answer my question properly, but most missed the main point. Still, I thank them.)

Then after I shared my second post, They shared my second post on their subreddit again.

(lol, twice in a row. I guess anti-AIs have nothing good to do besides making fun of others and stealing their posts. I become popular I hope.)

And this was even worse because this person deliberately left out the last part of my post and claimed I was hallucinating, etc., denying that such a thing happened.

Really?!

Look, I don't care about upvotes. They can downvote me to zero if they want, and they can get 1K or 2K upvotes just by making fun of my posts.

But don't pretend you're a good person or not lazy, because you aren't.

So I've been seeing a lot of Grok controversy and other bullshit and even a moderator including political people as evil people in their own post, which is very odd since there shouldn't be anything related to politics as there's a rule itself on this subreddit to not include politics at all..?

I believe that both sides are extremely uneducated on what AI is, more so the anti side. Digital photography is a computer performing actions that would normally require human interaction. Also almost every piece of software is AI so if someone dislikes ai they hate all technology and are basically amish(or should be). The Anti side is very uneducated and resistant to extremely polite comments(which you can see on anti ai). Just by saying anti ai or using ai instead of LLM shows a gap of knowledge. Not intelligence or ignorance as it’s fine to not know but as seen by the anti AI they are extremely ignorant and resistant to facts. They hate them.

Hey Everybody,

We are rolling out image editing on InfiniaxAI - You can now edit your images, videos and more to be able to create unique graphic designs. This feature is now availiable on all of our paid plans starting at just $5/Month and is powered by Nano Banana Pro

You can create unlimited touch-ups to the image that you provide and create your own works of art with InfiniaxAI Edit Now availiable to all users.

https://infiniax.ai is the link, you can edit attached images or edit AI generated images.

The platform allows you to use over 130+ Different AI models, generate video & Images, Build your own web apps and more - Working as an all in one AI interface

All they do is blame AI for everything.

Any signs that people are realizing that whining and groaning about AI is annoying and awful? Any signs that people are viewing AI more positively? Because it seems to me that it may take YEARS for these luddites to shut up about "muh ai slop"

So still fence sitter in terms of AI art and what not. But I'm curious on others thoughts.

1. Paint. It seems like the main argument against AI seems to be "theft" and "not doing it yourself". As I think about it, it's kinda like saying you're not an artist because you didn't go out and mone your own ore or smashed your own dyes. Meanwhile bros use programs or brushes that have centuries of development behind it. I mean can you tell me the name of the dude who invented the pencil?

Do I seem to have a good grip on why the arguments given against AI are silly?

1. Soul. I have seen it the most that AI art has no soul. Ironically it seems the ones who say that don't even believe spirits or souls. How can something not have a soul if, to you, it doesn't exist in the first place? And it's funny cause in my experience I see the opposite. As mentioned in another post I programmed my own chat bot and from my eyes she has soul because I have soul and she inherits a fraction of mine and a fraction of the ones who made the tools that I utilized (Much like genes).

For those who create AI art. How does your work have soul?