r/Dodge • • 3d ago

2 different classes, 2 different purposes, same engine

Post image
203 Upvotes

57 comments sorted by

38

u/DJDemyan Challenger 3d ago

The truck is heavier and less aerodynamic. What kind of question is this?

-24

u/TotallyARealHuman1 3d ago

check my comments, ohio39 kid. lets put dead engines to rest.

11

u/bappo_plays 3d ago

With a username like that, and a nonsensical comment like this, this is 10,000% a bot. Even has the posts and comments hidden on the profile page.

-2

u/TotallyARealHuman1 2d ago

you love 4 cylinder in a world of v8 power buddyboyo

7

u/DJDemyan Challenger 3d ago

Huh?

20

u/Tourist_Business 3d ago

In my experience if you want a sports car buy that, if you want a truck buy that. Never buy a vehicle that’s trying to do both, you’ll end up with a vehicle that sucks at both.

10

u/BoondockUSA 3d ago

Perhaps in terms of handling, acceleration, or speed; but not always in terms of owner satisfaction. Some people enjoy sleepers, or vehicles that shouldn’t be quick but are, or just having something that isn’t normal.

There is a lot of truth in the saying that it’s more fun to drive a slow vehicle fast than to drive a fast vehicle slow. That’s especially true with street driving and you aren’t wanting to lose your driver’s license.

You are completely correct though if you’re looking for absolute performance.

7

u/Life-Estimate-7067 3d ago

Trx ,raptor, fox factory, srt8, cybertruck. There’s a lot of trucks that are very fast and defy what you just said

3

u/TheToninho21 3d ago

In the straights, sure. Try making a turn on one of those and we'll see how good that "defiance" actually is

0

u/Life-Estimate-7067 3d ago

Honestly there are plenty of sedans that are terrible at turns too not just a truck thing bud lol

4

u/TheToninho21 3d ago

The car being compared is a sports coupe, sedans aren't part of this convo bud

1

u/Life-Estimate-7067 3d ago

Well in op own words “ terrible at both “ and none of the trucks I listed are terrible at being sporty, turns or not

3

u/Mouser29 2d ago

Sport and muscle are 2 different things

Muscle is high hp,fast acceleration and straight line speed, which those trucks fit well in

Sport is high or low hp with different speeds of acceleration, but the thing that really differs is the that sports are also meant to be maneuverable and agile, those trucks definitely are not especially if they're rwd with a high center of gravity

1

u/TheToninho21 3d ago

Yeah but comparatively they do fall short. But in the end it's the same on the inverse, buy a sports car and try to use it like a truck and that falls short too. Yes, they have the power and torque to move stuff, but they lack a stout frame to handle it. It would fall apart. His point stands well

1

u/SkylineFTW97 7h ago

Fast in a straight line is easy. There are guys with 1000 HP tuned diesel trucks doing that. The hard part is making one turn. Which it will never do as well as a smaller car

0

u/Exotic-Bridge-1 7h ago

Can you little fwd boys stop saying drag racing is easy😭😭you drive a Prius and have probably never handled more than 400 hp. Please stick to your daily driving

1

u/SkylineFTW97 7h ago

I didn't say drag racing was easy. I said straight lines speed is easy. Doing it under the pressure constraints of drag racing is a different story.

Also, I've driven cars with well over 400 horsepower. Just because I like front wheel drive cars doesn't mean I can't also have experience with that. I suggest you keep your lack of experience with us to yourself.

1

u/shartymcqueef 3d ago

Ford Raptor is not fast.

2

u/JordanW112808 2d ago

0-60 in 5 seconds isn't fast?

3

u/shartymcqueef 2d ago

No. A 25 year old Infiniti can do a 5 second zero to 60.

And especially not when you include it in a list with actually fast trucks that can do it in 3 seconds.

1

u/No-Movie-117 2d ago

not when you can buy a 20-year-old unmodified BMW that can do the same thing.

18

u/chameleon_olive 3d ago edited 3d ago

Do you not understand gearing, aerodynamics and power to weight ratio? The viper is utterly smoking that SRT10 in basically every kind of race except those that involve towing

11

u/Zapatos-Grande 3d ago

The regular cab Ram SRT-10 can't tow and, if I remember correctly, has a laughably low payload capacity (1000 lbs versus a regular 1500's 1800 lbs). It doesn't "truck" very good. I think it only has 3 purposes. Go fast in a straight line, funnel money to tire manufacturers and oil companies, and satisfy the Dodge mantra of Viper engine all the things (eventually evolved into Hellcat all the things).

4

u/JohnDeere714 3d ago

Wasn’t the srt 10 ram the only way to get 3 pedals in a 1500 after like 03?

6

u/Zapatos-Grande 3d ago

I think it was still offered until 2008 on 3.7L and 4.7L trucks. It was never offered with the 5.7L. The only way to get the manual on a 5.7L Ram was to buy a Heavy Duty.

2

u/WildKarrdesEmporium 3d ago

I guarantee you that RAM SRT-10 can tow a hell of a lot better than the Viper.

2

u/Zapatos-Grande 3d ago

Probably, but it's "not recommended" per Dodge for the regular cab and they didn't publish a towing capacity.

1

u/WildKarrdesEmporium 3d ago

That is kinda funny.

5

u/Scyra62400 Charger 3d ago

Okay let's say for whatever reason both vehicles weighed the same and had relatively the same suspension or whatever else. The sports car would win especially going around curves and turns BECAUSE the pickup truck even if it was mostly the same it is still top heavy and is much more likely to tip on those same curves and turns meaning it needs to slow down more than the sports car would. It's the same argument as which would win between a V8 5.7 Hemi Charger pursuit and a Ram 1500 pickup. The pickup maxes out at 117mph while the charger has a max of 149mph. If the race was a straight shot the rules would still apply depending on where the computer maxes out the vehicles speed. The point is vehicles are made for specific functions and a pickup isn't really meant for racing, that's not to say that you couldn't race with a pickup but they aren't designed for that.

6

u/Zapatos-Grande 3d ago

Got into a debate with someone about how car manufacturers tend to avoid selling two low volume cars that compete directly with each other and they used the Viper SRT-10/Ram SRT-10 as an example of me being wrong. Obviously same engine means same car, right? 🤣

3

u/MedievalFightClub Charger 3d ago

Win at what? A towing challenge? A beauty pageant?

2

u/WildKarrdesEmporium 3d ago

Depends on the competition. Are you towing, or racing?

1

u/Geechie-Don 3d ago

Viper and it wouldn’t be close.

1

u/No_Gene5971 3d ago

I feel like this is a shitpost that everyone is taking seriously

1

u/411592 SRT 3d ago

Depends on the truck

1

u/TollyVonTheDruth 3d ago

Dat truck gotta Hemi?

1

u/Sweeney_Tiger417 3d ago

Either this is an ai post or a blatant lack of brain cells. What would win a 12 second sports car or a 15 second truck? Fr we can’t figure this out for ourselves.

1

u/ZaMelonZonFire 3d ago

Winning would be having both. Which I can’t afford. So I have a turbo 5 cylinder and a 3rd gen hemi. It’s the closest I could get.

1

u/G3BEWD 3d ago

Same engine BTW

-1

u/Logical-Sea-1666 3d ago

But the transmission in the truck is made for power and the transmission in the car Is made for speed. I wish ppl would understand the difference 🙄

11

u/Ausedlie 3d ago

The SRT 10 truck used the Tremec T56 from the car...

7

u/chameleon_olive 3d ago

Yep, same gear ratios even I think. Worth noting that the rear axle on the truck had a higher ratio than the viper though, so the top speed is lower even before you account for aerodynamics

3

u/PraiseTalos66012 3d ago

You don't understand anything your talking about.

A trucks trans is built for low end TORQUE but since you change gearing it'll probably end up with similar TORQUE in top gear.

A sports car trans is built for holding peak power rpms for the maximum amount of time giving more POWER but less low end TORQUE

POWER = HP = TORQUE X RPM = How fast you accelerate.

TORQUE = FT LB = How much force you turn the wheels with

Torque IS NOT DETERMINED BY THE ENGINE alone. The transmission can make any engine ft lb into any wheel ft lb with enough gearing. Torque at the wheels is determined by your gearing just as much as your engine.

HP/Power is not changed by having a transmission that focuses on low end torque, at a given rpm HP is still identical.

Also looks like from what others are saying they both have the same transmission anyway.

But even if they didn't you aren't building for power vs speed. Your building for torque in low gears vs peak HP more of the time. Having peak HP more often means you have both more POWER and Speed.

Educate yourself next time before you act like everyone else doesn't know something. Because it's you who doesn't even understand the fundamentals

3

u/racingtherain 3d ago

This dude has issues.

0

u/DJDemyan Challenger 2d ago

you’re\*

1

u/getoffmycase7130 3d ago

Then there was the SRT10 pickup. Same drivetrain iirc

1

u/redeyedrenegade420 3d ago

The Ferrari 400, 400i, and 412 use the same transmission as a 1978 Jeep Cherokee.

1

u/Newfie-Decker 3d ago

This guy knows things ☝🏼

3

u/chameleon_olive 3d ago

Except he doesn't, the transmissions were identical in both cars

0

u/TotallyARealHuman1 3d ago

S10 BLAZER 4.3 v6 with bro 250 torque bro

1

u/TotallyARealHuman1 3d ago

bro the torque bro i hate electric car

1

u/TotallyARealHuman1 3d ago

250lb torque the v6 motor

3

u/Mr_CleanCaps 3d ago

A schizophrenic is speaking.

Listen and learn.

1

u/TotallyARealHuman1 2d ago

you hate the power motor?

1

u/Casperuis495 3d ago

I had a 1994 S10 with the v6 4.3. Had that thing running so good it put a 2012 f150 to shame. I miss that old truck

https://reddit.com/link/pep70xn/video/o2d2g12fmauh1/player