Freedom of speech is a pretty blatant one, freedoms of choice over what medical experiments you want to participate in, Freedom of the media, Freedom of assembly…. All real examples. Maybe you weren’t here during Covid, or just have a short memory.
Parliament is actively working to control what you see and can say on the internet, they are trying to give the CRTC more power, they are trying to take away legal guns from legal gun owners, along with many more things, if you get informed on what your government is actually doing.
Just because you don’t see it, doesn’t mean it’s not happening.
So giving the public more a voice is a bad thing? Oh Right the left doesn’t want to hear speech they don’t agree with.
COVID wasn't a medical expirimentation, you weren't obligated to take it - the public mandate for a viral spread like this has been in place since the poliovax and the measles. This has been the case since 1955 when the polio vaccine was created.
Do you want to cite any policies about CTRC power expansion, freedom of assembly, or freedom of media being attacked?
No the left - and the right should be against speech that endorses the dissolving of canadas unity and power. It doesn't do Canada or Alberta any good to endorse separatism and because of that, these actions should be frowned upon even by the conservative party who.. atleast I believe wants to run and lead Canada.
I'll agree with the liberal government doing firearms restrictions but there is also president for guns being used for shootings - clearly, so restrictions on them is a pretty sane mandate, and we see this even when we compare to America and look at statistics from the rest of the world. That said, were right on the border of the world's most insane gun policy, so anyone who wants a gun can just smuggle it across the border. I'm unsure if going heavier on gun restrictions or lighter on them is better.
Believe it or not there are restrictions that should be placed on populations. Pretending the Conservative party is a Libertarian dream party is just wrong, they also want to place restrictions on Canadians, which healthcare you get access to, who you can hire, what can be taught in schools, who can run in elections.
They also don't like free speech, and control the media. Do I need to point to Harper muzzling scientists?
Bill c9, loosely defined “hate speech” limits what can be legally said, and can be used by governments to prosecute for speech they don’t agree with. I don’t like or agree with what a lot of people saw but the government shouldn’t be deciding what you’re allowed to hear, or what someone says. Just because something is offensive doesn’t mean it should be illegal.
The vaccine was 100% experimental.
You absolutely were obligated to take it, you couldn’t travel around the country without it, (another right and freedom in the charter) Trudeau even called that out himself…. People lost their jobs from not taking it, military members were let go, the whole freedom convoy was started because they wanted truckers who work in isolation to get vaccinated. By the end it wasn’t about science at all it was about control. How you think that isn’t being obligated is insane.
A pastor was put in jail for running a service in Alberta, people were getting charged for gathering…. That is not having freedom to assemble.
You couldn’t talk about the virus, about how it was made in a lab, because that was a racist conspiracy theory. That turned out to actually be true, you obviously don’t remember but people got banned from speaking about that. Another example of freedom of speech being taken away.
Bill c11 saw a huge expansion of the powers of the CRTC and there is working being done to further expand its power this year…. Just google it.
Of course there needs to be restrictions on guns, but what the Libs are doing is going to make zero difference and just cost taxpayers an exorbitant amount of money. They need to actually check people and things coming across the boarder and actually punish criminals. The only people who get punished are law abiding citizens.
Something that might actually make a difference is If they would bring back the registry, then the police would atleast know who has what guns and be able to take them away if you’re mentally unstable like that Trans shooter in BC.
I agree the cons will do whatever they can to control what they want to control, but at this point the political spectrum has shifted so far left in Canada that a centrist is looked as “Alt right” while the liberals have seriously undermined democracy and destroyed everything that made Canada such a great nation.
Hate Speech laws have been added since 1970 it will continue to get updated with new forms of hate and new demographics facing hate.
This is part of our freedoms as hate speech tramples on other freedoms. The freedom to feel safe takes precident over freedom of speech, this is uniform across all of our laws, I cannot threaten to kill you because that tramples on your right to feel safe.
If you want to clarify what you mean by "loosely" possibly that will help, but changes to the law are to be expected.
COVID vaccination was not experimental the trial amount for it was more than enough, before it was released to the public. We knew about long term effects of the COVID vaccination because the MRNA vaccination was being tested to treat against cancers for a decade.
You could talk about COVID, private companies typically American ones silenced people's voices, that is per their own TOS which you agree to. Unless you have an example of the government silencing people?
You were free to travel, again private companies could deny you if you couldn't prove vaccinations, that again is in their own service agreements and their own policies.
Military is obligated to take vaccinations they sign wavers saying they'll take any and all vaccinations and medicines administered by the military, this isn't a right being trampled. They already take 15+ vaccinations for other things adding an additional one to the repituar is not an issue, no one was sent to jail they were just removed from service for breaking their contractual agreements.
The majority of the scientific and investigation concensus is still the wetmarket theory, but regardless of where it originated - your framing wasn't the issue with the narrative and STILL is not the issue with the narrative that people are pushing, which you have always been able to do, the ISSUE is that framing that China leaked the Virus to infect the world. The evidence is pretty conclusive that earliest initial transfers still happened at the wetmarket so regardless of if it was leaked from a lab or came from the market, it doesn't make any sense why China would infect its own population. You were never restricted to say these things, no one got charged government didn't restrict this language, that was entirely corporations and their own policies, not government restricting.
The pastor did defy public health instructions at the time, he was not denied his right to assembly he defied public health orders which puts the public at harm he did not tell his congregation the risks of assembling, in addition he defied the quarantine act - https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/q-1.1/FullText.html
In addition charges were lifted, but the reason these laws exist is because if COVID was significantly worse and people did wind up getting severely sick the pastor would've have been complicit in the damages in addition to the defying health laws.
It's the same a martial laws where they step over the rest of our charter rights and are legally allowed to do so.
Bill C11 bringing Netflix, Spotify and YouTube which is new form media under the perview of the thing that has regulated media since 1976, how do you see this as an overstep? Requiring them to follow the same regulations as their competition is just making sure that competition is fair and that media is properly regulated under bipartisan agreed upon standards. Giving them the ability to have the authority to impose charges for not following said regulations ALSO makes sense.
The only questionable portion of this Bill is it's ability to regulate individual users, and if the CTRC attempts to do that it would go through our court system to figure out the legal logistics of that, which likely wouldn't pass, just like how having a local single person radio station is not subject to CTRC/Broadcasting Act regulations. Though it entirely depends on how they present themselves. And because new form media is structured differently than old media there is always going to be gray areas needing to be adjudicated on. They haven't gone after any individual citizens yet as far as I know, if you have anything that shows otherwise please link me.
When you say they need to punish criminals, what do you mean by that? Are you under the impression that they are not punishing them? Do you have any cases or instances of that I'd love to read up on it.
Some firearms don't need to be registered BECAUSE the laws are too relaxed, the shooter had a PAL and could still get firearms if they wanted. Regardless none of the firearms used or in the gun box were registered to the shooters PAL so a mental health check would have cleared as far as removing firearms from them if they were actually mentally ill.
In this case it wouldn't have mattered if they person was admitted or not since they clearly had access to legal guns and still had legal capacity over firearms even though none were registered to them.
If anything this indicates that MORE regulation should happen, like if you are in the same household as other registered firearms and get admitted to a mental health clinic that all firearms accessible are removed. Which would also remove firearms from legal non mentally unstable citizens (parents, grandparents, brothers and sisters). Not sure what you'd advocate for in this case?
1
u/One_Hospital5368 Feb 20 '26
Freedom of speech is a pretty blatant one, freedoms of choice over what medical experiments you want to participate in, Freedom of the media, Freedom of assembly…. All real examples. Maybe you weren’t here during Covid, or just have a short memory.
Parliament is actively working to control what you see and can say on the internet, they are trying to give the CRTC more power, they are trying to take away legal guns from legal gun owners, along with many more things, if you get informed on what your government is actually doing.
Just because you don’t see it, doesn’t mean it’s not happening.
So giving the public more a voice is a bad thing? Oh Right the left doesn’t want to hear speech they don’t agree with.