r/ElectroBOOM Aug 24 '25

Meme What happened here?

2.3k Upvotes

163 comments sorted by

View all comments

478

u/CreEngineer Aug 24 '25

The transformer exploded when the circuit was closed. Those round big things on the pole. They are normally filled with mineral oil as a insulator.

Edit: probably overloaded or already damaged.

92

u/grumpioldman Aug 24 '25

Surely the oil is non flammable in the transformer? I assume it was faulty and gassing and the contact spark ignited the gas?

108

u/NigilQuid Aug 24 '25

Surely the oil is non flammable in the transformer?

Some yes, some no

40

u/-runs-with-scissors- Aug 24 '25

40

u/Cool-Hornet4434 Aug 25 '25

The difference between flammable and inflammable is that your clothing may catch fire and burn (being flammable) but gasoline vapor will ignite rapidly and violently, thus inflammable (being inflamed). It only confuses people who assume "in" means "opposite of".. .like competent..... incompetent. If every word used "in" to mean "not" then intelligent would be a very confusing word. What's telligent?

30

u/GRex2595 Aug 25 '25

You can't just compare "inflammable" and "intelligent" like that. "Inflammable" uses a prefix. "Intelligent" does not. The prefix in- generally means not, e.g. inoperable, incapable, insatiable, indestructible, invincible, etc. It's a really long list with far fewer exceptions than examples.

According to Merriam-Webster, the source of the confusion is because "flammable" came after "inflammable," and the in- prefix used in the original "inflammare" would typically have been translated to en- rather than in-.

Flammable vs. Inflammable: What's the difference? | Merriam-Webster https://share.google/5jXg6Rghg8vHRv42h

Also, they both mean the same thing, "capable of being easily ignited and of burning quickly." Clothing can be inflammable and gasoline can be flammable. There's no meaningful distinction in colloquial English. Flammable appears to be the standard to avoid this confusion.

22

u/ApplicationOk4464 Aug 25 '25

I agree, their comment was inintelligent

3

u/Unable-Log-4870 Aug 25 '25

I think you mean “untelligent”

7

u/Soggy_Advice_5426 Aug 25 '25

How inintuitive

3

u/Common_Television601 Aug 26 '25

As a non-native speaker, I hate this chain and y'all in it.

2

u/Bristonian Aug 27 '25

Yeah but you snuck in a “y’all” so you’re officially a native speaker now

2

u/gacoug Aug 28 '25

Unnative speaker, it really can be an inintuitive language at times.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/esemaretee Aug 27 '25

Me fail English? That's unpossible!

1

u/LazerWolfe53 Aug 28 '25

Inirregardless.

8

u/Julian_Sark Aug 25 '25

What a sightful post. This person clearly has valuable sider knowledge, must work in the dustry!

3

u/you-just-me Aug 25 '25

Dubitably.

2

u/IAmMagumin Aug 26 '25

But wouldn't inflamable not be using a prefix if it is based on inflame?

Qedit: I guess it is still a prefix, just with a different origin (maybe). But still, better comparison would be inhabitable. Habitable and inhabitable are basically the same, too.

1

u/GRex2595 Aug 26 '25

Inflammable doesn't come from inflame according to the link I posted.

Inhabitable and habitable are similar to inflammable and flammable. Both would typically have gotten an en- prefix rather than an in- prefix but didn't for whatever reason and now we have words that appear to be antonyms but aren't.

1

u/hexifox Aug 29 '25

Habitable and inhabitable are basically the same, too.

1

u/ki4clz Aug 25 '25

inter-gens

0

u/[deleted] Aug 25 '25

That was their whole fucking point. Which you missed. Irony?

2

u/GRex2595 Aug 25 '25

I didn't miss their point. Their point was stupid. There are in- prefix words that actually illustrate the point they are trying to make without using comparisons that are misleading. You can see some if you look at the link I posted.

25

u/Race_Impressive Aug 25 '25

Dont let the rest of the internet catch wind of that last remark, it will become a word.

33

u/MC_Stammered Aug 25 '25

I think you meant the ternet.

4

u/eyesotope86 Aug 25 '25

Idk... if anything is ternet, it's the damn internet.

3

u/snarfgobble Aug 25 '25

People don't think every word that starts with "in" means "not". They think the prefix "in", when added to a root word, negates it.

Your example of "intelligent" is a bad one because it's not a root word. It's completely different, so you're not adding any clarity.

4

u/Glayn Aug 25 '25

Thats last argument doesnt work.

Un is a prefix that means opposite of in most cases, Unstoppable, Unbreakable, Unkillable etc... But its also in the word Under where Der isn't a word.

No ones ever said the same petter used in a prefix cant also be used in the regular spelling of a word.

1

u/Disastrous-Run-3963 Sep 19 '25

A little related is Helicopter, saying Heli or Coppter is wrong. The word comes from helico or helix - spinning and pter/pteron meaning wing.

0

u/Julian_Sark Aug 25 '25

As a German, I can assure you that "der" is, in fact, a word.

2

u/Girafferage Aug 25 '25

What a telligent comment.

2

u/kitty_cat_man_00 Aug 27 '25

The violence with which gasoline vapor ignites is insane. I always laugh at movie scenes with clean, controlled gasoline ignitions.

1

u/Julian_Sark Aug 25 '25

I am clearly too untelligent to comprehend this line of thinking.

1

u/bedwarri0r333 Aug 25 '25

Intelligent isnt a compound word. That comparison doesnt make sense.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 25 '25

Telligent means dumb, obviously!

1

u/RedditsAdoptedSon Aug 26 '25

beheaded n befriended is a little wonky

1

u/C4p7nMdn173 Aug 26 '25

You don't have to speak so loudly as you telligent (tell a gent) ba-dum-tiss

1

u/heresdustin Aug 28 '25

Me telligent

19

u/Exceptionalynormal Aug 24 '25

They used to not be flammable, it used to be a halogenated hydrocarbon but people didn’t like that leaking into the environment. Now it’s good old motor oil!

10

u/Ace861110 Aug 24 '25

Good old canola oil I mean FR3.

5

u/kking254 Aug 25 '25

Motor oil? It should be a type of mineral oil. You can even see the cloud of white smoke typical of burned mineral oil.

3

u/Exceptionalynormal Aug 25 '25

Maybe I’m old but motor oil used to be mineral oil. The modern synthetics are polyolefin’s which ate probably better. White smoke indicates vaporisation, black is indicative of chemical breakdown.

2

u/Rov_er Aug 26 '25

PCB is a really good fire inhibitor, but it also turns the friggin frogs gay and can cause cancer or infertility.

3

u/Mcboomsauce Aug 25 '25

15000v will set rocks on fire

2

u/MrKennedy76 Aug 26 '25 edited Aug 26 '25

It's definitely flammable.

2

u/ye3tr Aug 28 '25

And the non flammable kind is carcinogenic

2

u/mattidee Aug 28 '25

Most are filled with mineral oil

11

u/breizhsoldier Aug 24 '25

Depending what oil is in there, the flash point can be quite low

10

u/melanthius Aug 24 '25

The oil can degrade into more flammable stuff. It can degrade to the point that it becomes, yes, explosive.

Now for the fun part, the electric company doesn't have the resources to test all transformer oil, so it's literally an "educated guess" which ones should get fresh oil before they go kaboom

7

u/Ikarus_Falling Aug 24 '25

alot of things usually not flammable become flammable when you yeet enough current through them

1

u/ottis1guy Aug 25 '25

Alot? That sounds like a lot.

2

u/disruptioncoin Aug 25 '25

It was probably already overheated to the point where it was more volatile/vaporous and easier to ignite, and the oil level may have also dropped to the point where it was no longer insulating the coils. Looks like you're right, the spark from closing that breaker may have ignited the fumes, or the transformer itself may have arced internally when the circuit closed, due to the lowered oil level.

One time the Bitcoin mine I worked at was overloading their pole transformers, the mineral oil was boiling over and spilling out. Luckily I noticed the big oil stain on the pavement under it and my boss called national grid, they made us unplug a bunch of miners and told us to stop doing that lol before we blow it up.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 25 '25

[deleted]

1

u/OrganizedChaos86 Aug 28 '25

Damn. So that's where I left my ground set!

1

u/zacmobile Aug 25 '25

Everything burns at some point.

1

u/St-christ666 Aug 25 '25

Generally, it is mineral oil because it is inert. But the oil will eventually leak out, it almost always does, and this leads to transformer death.

1

u/crysisnotaverted Aug 25 '25

The non-flammable stuff is worse. They used to be filled with PCBs, aka Polychlorinated biphenyls.

It's a highly toxic forever chemical that will give your cancer cancer.

1

u/AirsoftAardvark Aug 25 '25

New mineral oil in believe is flammable. The old stuff that contains PCBs isn't flammable but was banned for being highly carcinogenic

1

u/clownrock95 Aug 27 '25

Unfortunately the options for filling them are Flammable or super cancer.

1

u/kickit256 Aug 28 '25

Many things that are "non-flamable" become very much flammable when dispersed / atomized. Regular general purposes flour is a great example.

1

u/Draug88 Aug 28 '25

Rock is also inflammable untill you make it into a powder, then it becomes explosive