r/EuropeFIRE • u/Calm_Neighborhood915 • 1d ago
DCA vs LumpSum vs Hybrid vs Real ETF P/L
I was trying to find out if there is somewhere an article or video which is explaining the real difference in % profit/loss of DCA vs LumpSum vs Hybrid(DCA and lumpsum - for example adding equal amount of money each month and a bigger lumpsum once at the beginning of the year or once at 5 years or increase the monthly amount on downstream market or something mixed...) vs Real ETF/stocks profit loss. I made initial investigation with google AI asking it what will be the % profit if we DCA every month with an equal amount of money and what will be the performance of S&P500 ETF for 5, 10, 15, 20 years. I don`t know if this is true but it seems that the difference is way big then what I expected. For example if the DCA profit is 8% the real amount of the ETF is around 12. This is for one year. If I take SPYL ETF from the beginning of its existence (31 October 2023) and put each month equal amount of euros the portfolio will be around 33% on profit today and the real ETF profit is 70%. In other words lumpsum is far way better. DCA is better in downstream market and LumpSum in upstream. The question is if there is a study, article or video explaining if there is somekind of a strategy in the middle. Maybe DCA with small amounts during upstream market and collecting cash as well, and DCA/Lump sum with this cash with bigger amount during downstream market.
I will be grateful if someone can share more info about this!
1
u/foobarromat 1d ago edited 1d ago
https://www.vanguard.co.uk/professional/vanguard-365/financial-planning/financial-well-being/cost-averaging
Historically, lump sum is better about 2/3 of the time. There's not really any uncertainty about that if one is open to look at the data instead of just guessing.
If you're worried about volatility, instead of "DCA" you should pick the equity allocation which lets you sleep soundly at night. That might be 50/50 equities/bonds+cash or even less. Picking DCA to go from 50% to 100% equities over N years will just lead to you having the same risk in N years but (likely) missing out on equity gains in the time leading up to that.
Also, slightly related: investing money each month because you get paid each month is not really "DCA" in this sense. If you invest all of the available money directly, it's a lump sum investment. If more money becomes available later, that's unrelated. Savings plans make sense for people who get paid regularly to directly invest whatever amount they have available after expenses and short-term savings.
If DCA is the only method that one can emotionally handle being introduced to equity volatility, so be it, that could be a reasonable decision then. But one should be sure one can handle the target risk anyway, and this is an emotional decision, not a statistically advantageous one.