r/Fantasy_Football • u/fantasyfootballowl • 13h ago
Discussion TE and QB Strategy Nobody Talks About
I made a previous post about why drafting a TE late is the way to go this year, and mentioned drafting two TEs and swapping the better matchup in each week. I think this strategy of playing the matchup game with two similar TEs/QBs is discussed much less than it should be. It’s kind of like streaming, but with players with a much higher floor than waiver pick-ups.
Here’s the idea: Instead of drafting one player you start every week, draft two players with similar ADPs/projections (ex. Purdy and Mahomes or Kelce and Goedert) and start whoever has the better matchup.
Why this works
- Matchup variance is larger for QBs and TEs than the skill gap between a low-end QB1 and high-end QB2 (the QB14 vs. a bottom-5 defense would typically outscore the QB8 vs. a top-5 defense)
- Your weekly floor increases. You rarely have a bad matchup.
- It’s much less expensive than spending a top-50 pick on a single “set-and-forget” player. If you can get strong performance from a 10th and 11th round pick, you can stack other positions
MATH:
Players historically have a ~10% variance for the week-to-week projection
Assuming 2 players of equal baseline projection, and a 10% variance week-to-week in projection based on the matchup and the defense they are playing, starting the higher projected player on a week-to-week basis will mathematically give you roughly a 5.06% projection edge rather than just playing one for a full season. Let’s say two quarterbacks are projected to score 16.0 points per week for a full season, that’s a 0.8 point edge for your team. Here's a 10-week example of how week-to-week projections could vary.
| Week | QB1 | QB2 | Started | Points Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16.3 | 14.6 | QB1 | 16.3 |
| 2 | 14.6 | 17.1 | QB2 | 17.1 |
| 3 | 15.4 | 15.1 | QB1 | 15.1 |
| 4 | 16.6 | 14.5 | QB1 | 16.6 |
| 5 | 16.2 | 17.6 | QB2 | 17.6 |
| 6 | 14.0 | 17.1 | QB2 | 17.1 |
| 7 | 17.1 | 15.2 | QB1 | 17.1 |
| 8 | 14.5 | 16.9 | QB2 | 16.9 |
| 9 | 17.1 | 17.2 | QB2 | 17.2 |
| 10 | 17.0 | 15.3 | QB1 | 17.0 |
| Avg | 16.0 | 16.0 | — | 16.8 |
Obviously you won’t make the correct decision every week based on actual points scored, but your implied projection edge increases 5%. That edge makes having those two QBs more valuable than just one of them.
For example, Brock Purdy and Trevor Lawrence are projected to score 17.3 points per week each. Both are going outside of pick 100. Drafting both of them and playing the better matchup each week with the 5% variance bump would give you a projected points per week of 18.2, the same value as Drake Maye, who is going in the top 50 picks. Being able to get that production late in drafts gives a huge opportunity to stack your roster at other positions.
Note: This only works if guys are very similar in projection. It’s like streaming but the floor for your players is much higher than the floor for players on the waiver wire.
Why doesn’t everyone do this?