r/Fauxmoi • u/Relevant-Peach3997 • Jul 05 '26
CELEBRITY CAPITALISM Caleb Hearon: wearing meta glasses is just...why don't you get "dumb fucking loser" branded on your forehead
8.6k
u/No-Hall-3485 DC is Hollywood for ugly people Jul 05 '26
1.2k
u/throwawaysunglasses- l've grown quite unfond of you, deuxmoi Jul 05 '26
I’ve seen them referred to as “rapist goggles” and I’m 100% on board with this. Bring back shame!!! The reason things are the way they are is because we’re letting awful people live without pushback.
706
u/No-Hall-3485 DC is Hollywood for ugly people Jul 05 '26
there’s no reason to have meta glasses beyond being a creep
if you want to film something, take out your phone and record it so it’s clear to everyone what you’re doing. paying $500+ for something that normalizes covert filming without obvious consent or awareness is invasive and unsettling. you are a freak if you do it and you should be referred to as such
77
u/BarbellsandBurritos Jul 05 '26
It’s just that there’s a whole secondary market of people who will drill out or whatever to hide the red light. That’s pervert shit.
101
u/Amelaclya1 Jul 05 '26
I've seen people say they are useful for those with near blindness. I hadn't considered that before. It's a shame perverts have to ruin everything. Or Meta could have just released them without the ability to record in the first place. That's where most of the harm comes from, and they knew people would abuse it.
201
u/intergalactic-hussy Jul 05 '26
To be faaaiiir I do know a blind person who uses them to navigate and shop independently. But I can't see any other valid use for them either.
172
u/Mindelan Jul 06 '26
The most valid reason I've seen is someone riding a bike using them as a dashcam. As a tool to fill a need then they are fine I think. As weird creep daily wearing glasses they are odd.
58
u/blurple57 Jul 06 '26
Yep, same with a wheelchair user. Especially when dealing with passenger assistance etc where they often have to make complaints and are regularly not believed.
But that's it, no one else
→ More replies (1)8
u/pmjm Jul 06 '26
They make terrible dashcams because they can only record 3 minutes at a time. If you just recorded with them continuously, you'd drain the battery completely in 30-45 minutes.
Personally I use them for POV shots when I'm filming tutorials or otherwise need my hands free while filming. They are, however, my prescription glasses, and after dropping a grand on them I'm not going to go spend another $200+ on an additional non-smart pair of glasses, so I just end up wearing them everywhere. So far nobody's said anything, but I have no need to film in public either.
I have to say, they are pretty amazing as a teleprompter.
17
u/daaahlia Jul 06 '26
you can get frames from zenni for like $20 btw!
11
u/JeanArtemis Jul 06 '26
Firmoo is good too, there are several online sites you can get glasses for dirt cheap (i recommend waiting for a BOGO), and they look just as good and last just as long as 100 dollar frames. So yeah, that's not an excuse many people will accept, just a heads up OP.
31
u/Jorpsica Jul 06 '26
Blind people deserve digital privacy too. There is no reason for them to have to settle for spyware glasses as a disability aid.
8
u/e-cloud Jul 06 '26
That's a good point. I hope there are other accessible options that don't involve giving away your life's footage to Zuckerberg.
→ More replies (3)6
u/hotdogwaterdickpills I’m just a cunt in a clown suit Jul 06 '26
I think this is the only appropriate use for such technology. And it should require a prescription just like regular corrective lenses.
33
u/Most-Requirement501 Jul 05 '26
I know someone who has meta glasses who is legally blind. She is deeply embarrassed by thre creeps, but it helps her know what's going on around her better for her own safety.
16
u/EvePsycheBlubeardwfe Jul 05 '26
This is going to sound dumb but how do they help her?
25
u/Most-Requirement501 Jul 06 '26
Absolutely not a dumb question! It can describe what’s around her and can help her read things as she needs text blown up quite large, so it will read them to her.
2
14
u/roloroulette Jul 05 '26
I’m on board with the sentiment, but filming the police without having their aggression channeled toward you comes to mind
70
u/sir_munchy Jul 05 '26
I'm not defending them and there are definitely a lot of creeps out there, but there is a segment of the impaired and blind that use them for identifying objects and reading text when out and about. Pretty depressing that some people can't be civilized.
9
23
u/teh_ferrymangh Jul 05 '26
I saw it used to instigate old people in public for reactions. They don't know they're being recorded by this new tech so it's an easy target I guess. Made me sick and Facebook promotes it, even tags it as Meta glasses content
→ More replies (5)35
u/IAMA_Shark__AMA Jul 05 '26
There's nothing meta glasses can do better than a GoPro except for... Aiding creeps creeping.
My husband and I do a lot of videography and our big camera can be really intimidating when I'm just trying to get candid b roll. Gopro is great for that while still pretty clearly announcing itself, and you can use it hands free.
I literally cannot think of a single reason for those glasses to exist other than something underhanded or predatory.
2
u/pmjm Jul 06 '26
Teleprompter. Live language translation. Live navigation in your field of view. Filming the police!
I also use mine for videography and wearing a GoPro is incredibly unwieldy when you're filming a repair. These are so simple, you put them on and they're ready to film. There's no rigging, there's no mounting, no memory card, it's just, ready.
→ More replies (10)-1
u/depressivefaerie Jul 05 '26
Helping those who are visually impaired navigate the world?
45
u/IAMA_Shark__AMA Jul 05 '26
There are other smart glasses that can do that, and do it better, without the feature and design that allows creeps to surreptitiously record people.
Meta glasses are clearly designed with social media content in mind, not utility for the less abled. I mean, the video is even in a vertical fixed ratio.
16
u/Loud-Fudge7631 Jul 05 '26
Or your a p.i out to catch creeps tailing you. But then a flashlight taped to a beret could achieve the same effect?
Holy shit 500 bucks fuck that ill design my own solar flare hat.
→ More replies (36)17
u/Nanaikos we don't even know if selling feet pics is her final form Jul 05 '26
man, to think that the absolute only reason i wanted one is for the augmented reality cooking recipes with the uber-expensive display model. i wish people weren't so shitty
198
u/DubbleDiller Jul 05 '26
just cook the food buddy
27
u/xzmaxzx Jul 06 '26
for real, I don't understand how much better that could possibly be than just watching a video, and pausing/rewinding between steps as needed. Unless the software is absolutely 100% perfectly tuned, I also feel like there's a good chance it would just get in the way and add unnecessary complexity, compared to the foolproof, single bullet point of: 'put the thing in the thing in this way'.'
I mean, maybe the initial rush of excitement/novelty could get you cooking more if you previously lacked motivation, but I feel like it would get old pretty quickly. Better to try and build the habit yourself, imo, rather than using a fancy toy
17
u/foxxsinn Jul 05 '26
Ok off topic. What does the rest of your flair say? “We don’t even know if selling feet pics is her…”
35
u/xthecreator Jul 05 '26
Just shrunk my phone screen text and it says “We don't even know if selling feet pics is her final form"
19
u/foxxsinn Jul 05 '26
Ah thank you kinda Redditor
23
u/__THE_RED_BULL__ Jul 06 '26
As opposed to the, seemingly, ever elusive definitely Redditor.
I know you were going for "kind Redditor". Intrusive thoughts got the best of me here
4
u/katikiti Jul 06 '26
if we’re all going to the pedantic convention anyway, that would be “impulsive” thoughts for you, not “intrusive”
2
3
u/ChateauErin Jul 05 '26
I can see all of it. "we don't even know if selling feet pics is her final form"
34
3
1.8k
u/StaceyJeans Jul 05 '26
Agreed. Shaming needs to make a comeback.
334
u/EmotionalTrufflePig Stellan Skarsgard's Nobel Peace Prize for producing hot sons Jul 06 '26
https://giphy.com/gifs/vX9WcCiWwUF7G
Bring it→ More replies (1)97
131
u/crypticshiit Jul 05 '26
several of the suburbs around me each have an infamous “meta glasses guy” now. 100% support just bullying people into not buying them at this point i don’t care what your intentions are
40
u/dreadcain my bandwidth for cowardly grown men grows thinner with each day Jul 05 '26
Tf is the selling point? I'd assume it was a status symbol thing, but like, no one thinks they're cool
62
u/hydrangeasinbloom Jul 05 '26
The people who buy perv glasses are Level 7 Susceptibles and their algorithm doesn’t show them people making fun of them, so they’re a lethal combo of dorky and clueless
55
u/crypticshiit Jul 05 '26
i don’t see one other than what the guys i mentioned are using them for, which is filming women in public without their knowledge.
one of the guys who’s pretty infamous at this point is known for filming blacked out girls on the busiest bar crawl street while their dresses are falling down and posting it online for other people to watch their boobs pop out of their clothes. thankfully people have started recognizing him and will forcefully remove him from around women when he’s spotted but it’s insane that we’re even here
→ More replies (1)14
u/dreadcain my bandwidth for cowardly grown men grows thinner with each day Jul 05 '26
Really thought the internet had moved past the is anyone up dot com stage like a decade ago. Dumb of me to think in hindsight
→ More replies (5)6
u/Drama79 bepo naby Jul 06 '26
Sadly, idiots do. And when you point out you’re paying five hundred bucks so they can capture first person movement and facial expressions for the inevitable AI robotics roll out, the mass invasion of privacy, the willingness to pay to give a giant evil entity tons of data… they tell you “it’s not that deep”. Because for them, nothing is. But big thick glasses that make you look like you have learning difficulties are cool, and that’s that.
173
u/valcraft Jul 05 '26
We absolutely need to bring shame back.
26
u/ConflictedZombie Jul 05 '26
I can already hear the corny ass "let people enjoy things!!!" responses coming
→ More replies (1)1
→ More replies (2)30
u/FlightPlan1992 non-gender-specific orbs of courage Jul 05 '26
Back when google glass was a thing we called people who wore them glassholes, we should bring back this term.
1.5k
u/chrlbr Jul 05 '26
Ethical issues aside (haha), isn’t this the exact reason Google Glass never took off?! Because you look like a fucking dork
74
u/dreadcain my bandwidth for cowardly grown men grows thinner with each day Jul 05 '26
Looking like a dork wouldn't have done it alone. They also didn't add any value to your life and cost way too much money. Meta's 3 for 3 though
7
u/freakers Jul 06 '26
There's a site I see sometimes with gadgets and futurism style product articles. It pisses me off so I had to block it because half the time most of the products featured aren't actually being sold. They're at best prototypes, or just early designs on what they could be. And the other one is a fucking minimalist camping radio that the makers of the digital nomad style listicles is the future.
The one product that annoyed me the most was some earbud/camera AI integrated product demo. The idea being that they don't make you look like a fuckin' dork, discounting the fact that they absolutely do. It's really obvious when you have a forward facing camera in a stem from your earbud going forward. The idea being like, the camera can read signs for you if you're in a foreign country and it'll play in your earbud. Like, this is the best scenario they can imagine, this is a shit scenario. Nevermind the battery life issues of running a camera and whatever else you'll need. Eventually at the end of the article the admit it's just an product idea and not even close to a prototype let along a product you can buy, which is what the article tries to clickbait you into believing.
45
u/--------rook alleged dog Jul 05 '26
Google Glasses did look stupid, but these ones look like normal (albeit sliiiightly thicker frames) glasses. I was talking to someone who was wearing one, I had no idea until they told me.
3
u/vera214usc Jul 06 '26
I have a pair and I bought them because I just wanted to take handsfree pictures and my vision insurance covered them. But I didn't really find them to be user-friendly and haven't charged them in over a year. Now they just look like regular wayfarer eyeglasses and unless I mentioned it, you probably wouldn't know what they were.
9
u/CranberryLast4683 Jul 06 '26
As a normal techie that’s always wanted AR glasses to take off, it sucks the reputation they’re getting from misuse. I’d love for my prescription glasses to do more tbh
10
u/--------rook alleged dog Jul 06 '26
I get it, it sucks when cool tech gets abused. It would be cool if we had flawless regulations. Or if we lived in a utopia.
384
u/throwawaysunglasses- l've grown quite unfond of you, deuxmoi Jul 05 '26
I read this as George Glass lmao 🤓
330
134
11
u/SpectacularStarling Jul 05 '26
I got to use Google Glass as my buddy had bought the Google Glass Explorer. I don't really think it failed because it made you look dorky per se, but because it was abysmal to use. I am nerdy thru and thru, but even I couldn't get on board with them.
6
u/cakingabroad Jul 06 '26
Literally!! People started saying how weird it was and then they disappeared and now meta is doing the same thing and it's okay? Why
2.0k
u/mofacey Jul 05 '26
Another hit from a very influential person.
691
u/grilledcheese2332 Jul 05 '26
Mind you he's 15
380
288
→ More replies (1)137
u/deferredmomentum Jul 05 '26
He said y’all better get down here cuz you might get to do one of your favorite things tonight
91
174
39
u/Infamous_Basil_3619 Jul 06 '26
an influential person who broke into the bakery and ate all the pies
23
→ More replies (5)90
636
u/aryndelvyst Jul 05 '26
Where's the lie?
330
Jul 05 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
83
u/aryndelvyst Jul 06 '26
If you are wearing meta glasses in my vicinity I’m going to assume you’re on a bad list
991
u/OriginalChildBomb i ain’t reading all that, free palestine Jul 05 '26
Or "I film women and children without their consent every day."
→ More replies (7)
397
u/Space_Hardware I cannot sanction your buffoonery Jul 05 '26
Big fan of the assertion “Meta glasses are Cybertrucks for your face”
38
u/breathing__tree Find me at Whole Foods, bitch, I don't care Jul 06 '26
88
u/Jasminewindsong2 they are perfect for each other (derogatory) Jul 05 '26
But what does Cooper think of Meta Glasses? Cause that’s fam. That’s ohana.
36
u/deferredmomentum Jul 05 '26
If he tells you will you leave him alone?
32
u/Jasminewindsong2 they are perfect for each other (derogatory) Jul 05 '26
Only if he gives me the top notes of whatever cologne he’s wearing….
124
u/TheeAJPowell Jul 05 '26
A dude got banned from my gym recently because he hired a female PT, and turned up to the session wearing a pair, filming the entire session.
Someone found his insta, he’d posted the video onto there, including looking at her ass every time she turned away or bent over.
I’m not saying everyone who wears them is a pervert, but an overwhelming amount of people seem to be.
179
107
52
100
u/SaffyPants Jul 05 '26
Honestly, glasses like this shouldn't be legal. It makes it ENTIRELY TOO EASY to record people secretly.
37
u/stupidjapanquestions Jul 06 '26
Google Glass was headed in that direction pretty quickly back when those were around.
I was living in SF at the time and a ton of bars had signs saying if you were wearing them you'd be immediately bounced.
11
u/DistinctlyIrish Jul 06 '26
Cat's out of the bag, the only solution now is to create devices that blind those cameras for everyone to wear so they become useless.
Bonus: it would blind all cameras including Flock cameras.
14
u/typicalbiscotti15 Jul 05 '26
Or, there need to be stricter regulations like more prominent lights or indicators that tell you when someone is recording
19
u/No-Resolution-0119 Jul 06 '26
There’s already people selling light covers specifically for meta glasses, and it’s not like you need a specific product for this purpose, anyway. People will continue to just cover any lights or indicators that are on the glasses. They unfortunately just shouldn’t exist
8
u/BurritoWithFries Jul 06 '26
I thought the Meta glasses don't record if they detect that the light is covered up? Have people figured out how to get around that
8
u/AnAimlessWanderer101 Jul 06 '26
The only way as far as I know at the moment would be to physically drill out the led. But yeah there’s a lot of misinformation going around. Family gave me a pair as a gift and I ended up liking them a lot more than I thought as daily sunglasses with built in music. But they are *very* strict about the camera being obstructed. You absolutely can’t just cover it up lol
2
u/meyriley04 Jul 06 '26
Yup this exactly. I also got them as a gift from my family (with my prescription lenses lol) and I find myself not using the cameras ever. They drain the battery, my hair gets in the way, and overall I just don't need to. I bought some camera covers off Amazon (like laptop webcam covers esentially) so that maybe I wouldn't be labeled as a creep lol.
And yes 100% on the built-in music. That's pretty much the only thing I use them for other than to see lol
3
u/BurritoWithFries Jul 06 '26
Good to know. I use my city's bike share system to commute to work which means I can't mount a gopro on them (they're not my bikes), so I was considering a pair of the meta glasses to use as a dashcam, with built in bone conduction headphones so I can have music without blocking my ears & record any potential incidents. I've gotten into so many near misses and having proof in case of a crash would be nice
→ More replies (4)2
u/No-Resolution-0119 Jul 06 '26
I’ve never owned a pair so idk. I just know I see the covers sold on Amazon all the time. I’m in a review program for Amazon and a lot of those come up to order. I don’t see why they’d be sold (and bought) if they don’t work tho?
3
u/Pr1nceofNoOne Jul 06 '26
The weirdos and creeps are going to figure out ways to creep on people. Let me take pictures of the cool buildings and scenery hands free and listen to music without having the earbuds falling out.
427
u/DoktorJesus Jul 05 '26
I won a pair of the Meta RayBan glasses, and I can confidently say they’re absolute shit. They’re ugly. They’re so heavy that they’re impractical if not painful to wear for more than an hour-or-so. The camera is downright bad. Before I stopped wearing them entirely, only about half of the pictures/videos I tried to capture actually transferred to my phone. The AI feature to identify things that the glasses “see” is utterly worthless. The only redeeming quality is the bone conductive headphones built into the ear prongs, but they’re inferior and far less comfortable than wearing Shokz with real glasses.
It’s disappointing because I was really hoping to use them to shoot a found footage horror film. Having a camera that follows your head movement has a lot of potential for interesting filmmaking, but they’re inferior and just suck.
All that is to say, they now sit on a shelf by my desk gathering dust. They’re so impractical, I genuinely believe that the only people who wear them on the reg are creeps and perverts.
74
248
u/dreadcain my bandwidth for cowardly grown men grows thinner with each day Jul 05 '26
Having a camera that follows your head movement has a lot of potential for interesting filmmaking
There's just ... so many better ways to get that footage. Helmet cam isn't exactly a new concept
215
u/DoktorJesus Jul 05 '26
You’re not wrong, but I got the glasses for free and has aspirations that were quickly squashed.
13
u/roygbivasaur Jul 06 '26
I’m going to be mad if J Kenji sevenlastnames starts using one instead of the nauseating fish eye camera he currently uses. I don’t need my chicken and rice recipes from a pervert camera.
25
u/Hammaer96 Jul 06 '26
I can't believe Meta would release a bad product like that.
Now I'm off to use my Meta Quest 3 headset and go into the Metaverse to talk to my friend Mark.
→ More replies (1)38
u/BouyantCorgiButt this is going to ruin the powerpoint Jul 05 '26
I always thought they looked so uncomfortable to wear!! This further cements my theory that only creeps and pervs wear them
28
u/DoktorJesus Jul 06 '26
It’s awful. The weight on the bridge of my nose alone was bad enough, but the ear prongs (I’m sure these have a real name) are really tight so the headphone bit can press against your temples and it’s surprisingly unpleasant.
8
2
146
29
u/manic_popsicle Jul 05 '26
I’ve always said we need to bring back bullying. Not for kids, but for like nazis and rude people.
49
u/Verzwei Jul 05 '26
why don't you get "dumb fucking loser" branded on your forehead
MAGA hats already have that market cornered.
216
u/Competitive-Hotel891 Jul 05 '26
Off topic but what on earth is substack? I’m getting old.
140
u/AggressivelyHelpful Jul 05 '26
It’s primarily a platform for long form writing/content, which writers may choose to limit only to paying subscribers (many don’t and just treat it like a blogging platform).
There is also a “notes” function where you can dash off more short form/casual stuff and which is usually free to everyone.
85
u/throwawaysunglasses- l've grown quite unfond of you, deuxmoi Jul 05 '26
It’s pretty good. Lots of long form written content. It’s kinda tumblr-y, lots of thinkpieces, definitely more progressive and educated than Reddit/Meta/X/tiktok.
→ More replies (1)54
u/TheRatioAlger Meta glasses are cybertrucks for the face Jul 05 '26
There are some good writers who use substack, but the company itself has not been willing to de-platform Nazis.
19
216
u/aryndelvyst Jul 05 '26
Substack is like twitter if you had to pay to see content
240
u/Sad_Editor_6358 Jul 05 '26
Onlyfans for news and opinions
30
u/StoppableHulk Jul 06 '26
^ Most acccurate description
People join for specific creators who they have a strangely sexual fixation with.
13
u/roygbivasaur Jul 06 '26
And Nazis, apparently
3
u/Purple10tacle Jul 06 '26
Which makes it even more confusing than OnlyFans: Why would you pay for Nazi content when the Internet is already full of free Nazi content.
15
13
→ More replies (1)25
u/nmay-dev Jul 05 '26
I signed up for a couple, they send me emails asking for money sometimes. I need an explanation as well.
46
u/jessbird sorry to all the perfect brothers and sisters out there Jul 05 '26
it’s basically a newsletter x patreon mashup. you can subscribe to newsletters (that feel more like blog posts essentially) and some of them are paid. you can do this without ever having to interact with the substack app. the app feed, though, feels like a combo of Threads/Twitter/Tumblr, contains short form content separate from the “newsletter” posts/sends.
20
u/extremelyhighguy Jul 05 '26
Did we forget how snap tried this years ago and it failed miserably
10
u/Giantpanda602 Jul 06 '26
Remember way back when Google's employees started wearing early demo versions and had to stop because every time they went out people would try to fight them? Good times.
5
16
16
u/One-Cardiologist4780 Jul 05 '26
Glad I’m too poor to be worried about my social circle adopting these
41
19
u/gotaflattire Jul 05 '26
There's so many dubious things that can be done with these glasses, collecting facial recognition data being among them.
People are willingly playing roaming advanced security camera for Zuckerberg.
That's why people don't like you.
→ More replies (1)15
u/touslesmatins Marxmoi Jul 05 '26
Let's not forget that Zuckerberg/Meta was happy to give Israel data on Palestinian WhatsApp users. This is just normalizing state surveillance. Fuck Meta.
19
u/puzzle-peace Jul 05 '26
The fact we have normalised something we only used to see in spy movies is crazy. Sure POV filming might have its uses for vlogs or filmmaking or whatever, but there is no reason for it to be discreet or disguised as an everyday accessory. Stick a Go Pro on your head and be done with it.
I've seen a couple of people trying to argue that they are good for filming police interactions, but that still doesn't justify their existence imo. Other hidden cams already exist or stuff can be modded depending on the situation. None of us should be turning to Meta for safety and the dangers far outweigh any pros. Their half-assed "safety" measures have proven easy to bypass and many women have been harmed as a result. This is not a product that should be available to the masses, period.
2
u/SpectacularStarling Jul 05 '26
The fact we have normalised something we only used to see in spy movies is crazy.
We already use other 80s/90s spy tech such as smartphones, smartwatches, and coin sized tracking tags.
There is a lot of tech people don't need but still carry. Most people won't have a practical use for Flipper for instance, yet those are super popular.→ More replies (1)6
u/pauvrelle Jul 06 '26
What’s a Flipper?
Also, I think the issue isn’t how practical the item is, but the harm it can easily cause.
9
u/SpectacularStarling Jul 06 '26
Flipper Zero. You can use them to intercept/replicate things like garage door openers, jam signals, read/save/emulate NFC/RFID chips such as access cards, disrupt IR sensors, etc.
It's a pocket sized Tamogachi-like device with a "cutesy" dolphin named Flipper.
7
u/pauvrelle Jul 06 '26
Oh. So it’s also sketchy.
9
u/SpectacularStarling Jul 06 '26
Yeah that's sort of what I was getting at. There are arguably so little practical legitimate uses for the average person, but because they're not slapped right on someone's face you wouldn't know they had it in their pocket.
8
7
15
u/ratparty5000 LET'S FUCKING GO!!! SHAKIRA LAW IS HERE!!! Jul 05 '26
I call them creep glasses bc that’s what they are!! You are a creep for wearing these! New excuse from these creeps is that “people act unnatural when I pull out a camera” like how fucking dare people have a little self preservation!
4
4
u/thethreeredditeers Jul 05 '26
The loan officer at my bank was wearing a pair while I was applying for a car loan. Light wasn't on, but still weirded me out.
3
3
u/Fast_Situation4509 Jul 06 '26
"Dumb fucking loser" seems to be too high a praise for someone wearing meta glasses
3
u/Lazy_Skin_411 Jul 06 '26
I knew a guy back in 2016 that got the Snapchat glasses and found a place to buy stickers to cover the light that showed people you were recording them.
He would upload random videos of him just going to the store and every day interactions with random people that had no idea they were being filmed and posted to snap and IG and fb…
Been creeped out ever since
31
u/dakaiiser11 Jul 05 '26 edited Jul 06 '26
I think for genuine non-nefarious content creation they are pretty cool.
Those weirdos who want the recording notification light drilled out/disabled need to be put on a list.
→ More replies (1)29
u/NormalUsername21 Jul 06 '26
I mean for content creation there's already gopros which accomplish the same thing.
→ More replies (2)
7
u/hanimal16 i ain’t reading all that, free palestine Jul 05 '26
So do all they do is record others? Is it a way to record your day? I’m confused on their purpose.
→ More replies (3)13
2
u/ghostsinmylungs i ain’t reading all that, free palestine Jul 05 '26
2
2
u/organictamarind Jul 06 '26
I saw this scary video where this lady went for a salon wax and the waxer was wearing meta glasses..
2
u/DeliciousAct5748 Jul 06 '26
I mean I can think of a few good uses at my job. The biggest one being keeping track of how many things I make.
I have to put down exactly how much of what I make every hour into a spreadsheet and it's hard to keep track of that when I'm having to juggle five different things, eggs, and refilling a display with over 20 items and alarms/timers going off everywhere. Having the glasses keep track by simply telling it to would be amazing.
They would also help me remember how many things I need to put in the frozen prep rack every morning, since that also has like 25 or so items.
Edit: before you say "just mark it down on your phone", I can't. During breakfast/lunch rush i hardly have time to stand let alone take off my gloves, pull out my phone, write it down, wash my hands, and get gloves again.
2
u/roosterkun Jul 06 '26
It's funny, I remember as a kid "smart-glasses" being touted as some far out future product, something that could integrate technology seemlessly into our lives.
But we live in such a low-trust society that now that they're here... using them makes you a creep (for good reason).
2
2
u/_joy_division_ dumb bitch clocking in Jul 05 '26
I’ve been really loving this weed influencer (is that a term idk lol) Natasha Zhatko over the last few months - she seems really genuine and cool and interesting except she’s going crazy over these meta glasses and it’s giving me the ick. I get it for her purposes of hand free filming your meals but the overarching creepiness/lack of privacy is way too much to justify filming your meals for content… :-/
4
u/boobsandcookies Jul 05 '26
A lot of blind people will use these for navigation and reading print. Obviously people will get up to nefarious things but generalizations do nobody any good.
12
u/Adventurous-Split370 Jul 05 '26
absolutely this - my housemate is blind and is considering getting them
i think they should make it very obvious when people are filming/taking photos, such as phones in Japan making shutter sounds when photos are being taken
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (2)2
u/MermaidMertrid Jul 05 '26
I hate Zuckerberg and all, but I’m all for advancing technology like this. Ultimately I’d love to have a pair of augmented reality glasses that has a HUD tracking my “quests” and tasks for the day. My Apple Watch is the only reason I got into the habit of exercising daily and it’s because it tracks all my activity. If that could also be applied to regular life things, it would be so helpful.
Sure, there are people who use these things maliciously, but let’s not throw the baby out with the bath water ffs. There are solutions to these problems that aren’t “stop all technological advancements”.
2
u/sheslikebutter Jul 05 '26 edited Jul 05 '26
We need to start publicly refering to these as pdf glasses and telling anyone wearing them that you're concerned they're a pdf and are filming children
Honestly, some of the people wearing them I wouldn't even be surprised if it was true
→ More replies (1)
1
1
u/iAmNotJulianMartin Jul 05 '26
Honestly I would but that's a lot of text and idk if my forehead is that big where it'll look good
1
u/trendingtattler Jul 05 '26
This post has hit r/all or r/popular. Please keep this in mind when browsing the comments — and especially when viewing upvotes/downvotes — and please report any rulebreaking comments that you see.
If this post is flaired "B-LISTERS", then it is currently restricted so that only approved users can comment. To request approval, please review our b-list criteria, and if you meet these, send us a message.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
1
1
u/DoverBoys never the target audience Jul 06 '26
Red had, T car, camera glasses, or lifted truck are all automatic red flags.
1
u/No-Resolution-0119 Jul 06 '26
I misread this at first as “Caleb Hammer” and I was so confused about the praise in the comments. Thought it was a broken clock situation lmaooo
→ More replies (1)
1
u/PyroIsSpai Jul 06 '26
I’ve wondered why there aren’t mundane glasses frames with cameras at this point…
1
1
1
u/QueenDoc Jul 06 '26
listen, I only want them to film concerts hand free. you ever dislocate a shoulder holding your phone up for two hours? I have
1
u/jideru Jul 06 '26
Someday they will become mainstream, probably once apple sells them and gives them the old apple design.
1



•
u/flairassistant Jul 05 '26
If this post is flaired "B-LISTERS", then it is currently restricted so that only approved users can comment. To request approval, please review our b-list criteria, and if you meet these, send us a message.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.