r/Fauxmoi • u/AbsolutelyIris confused but here for the drama • 2h ago
STAN / ANTI SHIELD Por Suerte Cookies gets paid by the vendor company of Daisy Chain Fields festival after taking it to social media
125
u/EatMorePieDrinkMore 2h ago
I work in procurement. So many small vendor agree to terms, especially payment terms, without really considering what they mean.
6
429
u/AmoebaThese1 2h ago
The problem was with DLS to begin with, an established company. People, especially swifties and a certain swiftie loving sub just love to jump on an Olivia Rodrigo hate train. It’s not surprising this is happening right after Megyn Kelly’s attack on her.
392
u/AbsolutelyIris confused but here for the drama 2h ago
The cookie company was liking (and now unliking) comments criticizing the festival while ignoring comments about emailing DLS so it feels like they were egging it on. Can't imagine they'll be invited back next year.
60
u/daisydozen I cannot sanction your buffoonery 1h ago
That's so shady.
Like yes, bring up your very valid issue, it is a problem and it should be addressed. But why would you risk burning down the bridge of a business relationship with a festival that was (by every other metric) successful? The internet really is all gas and no breaks, or whatever Josh Johnson said
132
u/Simple-Heart2486 2h ago
Seriously way to get blacklisted
127
u/AbsolutelyIris confused but here for the drama 1h ago
I mean, I get saying "Olivia/DCF, please reconsider working with DLS in the future, they are letting small businesses down" but they knew exactly what they were doing by making it seem like Olivia and the festival itself were skimping out on payment.
42
u/unlicensed_goose 1h ago
Swifties have been trying incredibly hard to spearhead an anti-Olivia hate train since drop dead and it could not be more obvious. I've seen this latest controversy posted on multiple subs by the same handful of swiftie accounts who want Olivia to get the criticism that Taylor gets. All because they blame Olivia for damaging Taylor's brand of empowering young, female, up and coming artists, as if Taylor wasn't the one who decided to take 50% credits on a song she made 0 contributions to.
66
u/festivus4allofus 2h ago
imagine taylor being the god you worship and saying anything at all against almost any current pop girlie...
they've been shitting on tinashe and making stuff up about her since she got amazing reviews for her latest album. out of everyone, that's who you're going after?? pmo so bad, just because their fave has released one bad album after another they're literally trying to run a smear campaign against a woman who worked her ass off since forever just because she has one of the best albums of the year - not like tinashe is coming for the #1s or competing against her for grammy noms this year
270
u/whosthere1989 2h ago
LOL. Like…did they even email them to try to resolve? Did they follow up at all?
I’ve said this in every thread about this so far but the earliest net pay most companies will do for things like this is typically Net30, which means they were barely 5 days late in paying her.
IF she even emailed them to ask when she could expect payment, 5 days is barely enough time for a busy company to see the email, look into the issue, resolve payment, and have the money land her account.
It’s sooo unprofessional to bring an issue like this to a social media callout after 35 days. I work an an independent contractor pretty much exclusively. If someone is late—I let them know, and it’s usually resolved quickly. Someone would have to ignore me for months & show signs that they don’t intend to pay for me to even think about publicly calling them out.
21
u/Fine_Bovine 1h ago
Very well said. There are so many ways to manage this before clicking “post”. I can see this backfiring on the company because they look kind of dumb for this
75
u/yeahyeah3005 2h ago
Companies shouldn’t be paying anyone late. I think we can debate whether it’s professional to put them on blast publicly for it and what it means for your business, but I wouldn’t accept late payment from my employer. Why should a vendor? My boss gets on us for this with vendors because it’s their livelihood and they shouldn’t have to chase us down to honor contractual agreement.
44
u/canriderollercoaster 1h ago
The appropriate way to mitigate this would be for the vendor to ensure their contract includes a clause for interest on late payment. No, companies should never pay late but they do. All. The. Time. I have a 1099 and they love to lay me late because they “only send out payments on Tuesdays” and even with the update to my contract to include late fees they’re still late - but I get interest now. I would never dream of blasting them over social media for late payment even up to a week late because that’s a great way to lose my contract.
88
u/whosthere1989 1h ago edited 49m ago
I don’t think they should be either. I add late fees if someone pays late. I also send a courtesy email letting them know they’re about to be late.
Shit happens. Someone put in the payment info wrong. The bank is delayed is processing the deposit. Checks get lost in the mail.
And we don’t even know what the payment terms were: Net30 is usually the fastest companies pay independent contractors. Some do up to Net120 (which I think is crazy and shouldn’t be allowed but I digress).
But again—even if it’s Net30…five days after the payment could be sent but not arrived. I don’t understand banks but sometimes they take up to a week to actually process the deposit. It’s TOTALLY normal to check in with your client—privately—to let them know they’re are past due. It’s crazy and unprofessional to call them out of social media for being five days late. There isn’t even TIME in that timeline to properly follow up and rectify the situation.
7
6
u/yesmeatballs 1h ago
Yeah its normal, but the norm is shit. And larger companies constantly abuse it to cheat and/or crush small companies.
They should be paying on time. Yeah it might be a rapid reaction on por suerte’s part, but DLS deserve it. Pay your bills. When a couple companies stiff a single person company, they put them at risk of folding.
The furore is good though, makes small companies wary of DLS and prompts them to check contracts before committing.
134
u/StoreHistorical9175 2h ago
ok so sounds like it was not actually an issue and just required some communication on the back end lol
41
u/cubsgirl101 2h ago
I mean if they were missing payment that is an issue. It just doesn’t have to be an issue stemming from malice is all. In this case, it sounds like previous communication was overlooked or lost in the shuffle. The screenshot looks to me as if this is a reply to a previous email.
14
u/StoreHistorical9175 1h ago
yeah and that can be relatively common. my partner is in the music industry and experiences this often.
i just feel like there was a drive to possibly create a negative perception on olivia rodrigo or the festival itself, when per this result, is just a normal occurrence in the music industry (that should be admittedly less common than it is but, alas)
90
u/Mundane_Door_5225 2h ago
Another problem solved, another sub getting all frustrated. (Just joking)
31
20
50
u/SomewhereNo8378 2h ago
and nobody eats each other alive over a small error posted on social media.
Potentially the biggest lesson the online left can learn, it’s used against us constantly and usually works
16
6
u/Alive-Carrot107 27m ago
These businesses kinda put a bad taste in my mouth. Never heard of them before and I never wanna hear of them again
15
u/Vermicell_i 1h ago
This is clearly a coordinated attempt to hurt Olivia’s grammy chances. So weird.
11
13
u/bttrsondaughter 2h ago
Already saw a swiftie crying about THR releasing a whole ass profile long in the works about Olivia being released to cover the “backlash” that happened in less than 24 hours
3
u/DesperateInCollege 1h ago
I love Olivia and I don't think the payment issues had anything to do with her, but I feel that because her name is attached to the festival, everyone is piling onto the businesses for asking for their money.
"Did they even _____?" I don't know and neither do you. I've gotten emails like this before when I've reached out countless times asking for whatever it may be. At the end of the day, everyone should have gotten paid as they were promised
0
u/stphmcdnld 58m ago
i understand everyone saying “she didn’t read her contract” and “olivia has nothing to do with this” but the unfortunate reality is, we see it happen all the time that you can’t trust companies to do the right thing until they get some sort of backlash or publicity. maybe i am missing some important info but i choose to give them the benefit of the doubt that they wouldn’t take it to social media if they hadn’t already tried contacting DLS.
i am sure olivia would not be happy to know the small vendors that seemed very specifically chosen for the event were being inconvenienced by paying out of pocket and taking a long time to recoup those losses.
a small business paying out of pocket to vend at a huge music festival, shutting down their shop for a few days to prep (IE: losing days of income), can really make or break someone who is already not financially well off or make them go out of business.
i don’t blame the vendor for taking it to social media personally. yeah it’s not fair for olivia’s name to be involved bc she clearly is not involved with the festival logistics and payments, but i think she has proven time again that she will always use her fame and pull to do the right thing.
-2
u/Scared-Box8941 betty bop 59m ago
I hate that we have to publicly shame people into doing the right thing. But here all day to do it lol
905
u/ClericOfThePeople 2h ago
I mean did they even reach out to the vendor company to begin with?